Ziprasidone Augmentation of SSRIs for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) That do Not Sufficiently Respond to Treatment With SSRIs
NCT ID: NCT00633399
Last Updated: 2014-07-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
458 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2014-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis A: There will be a difference in the percentage of responders in the two treatment conditions during phase 2; response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ziprasidone vs. Sertraline/Haloperidol in Psychotic Depression
NCT00340379
Ziprasidone and Sertraline in PTSD
NCT00248261
The Effectiveness of Sertraline in Patients Who Have Had Inadequate Response to Escitalopram
NCT00179257
A Research Study to Compare the Treatments of a Combination of Elzasonan With Zoloft, to Zoloft Alone, or Placebo in People With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
NCT00275197
Aripiprazole Augmentation of SSRI Therapy in Treatment Refractory Depression
NCT00608543
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis B1: During phase 2, there will be a difference between the two groups in the percentage of responders (50% or greater reduction in symptom severity) with regards to anxious symptoms of MDD as measured by the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group.
Hypothesis B2: During phase 2, there will be a difference between the two groups in the percentage of responders (50% or greater reduction in symptom severity) with regards to painful symptoms of MDD, as measured by the overall visual analogue pain (VAS-pain) scale scores; response rates will be higher for the ziprasidone group.
Hypothesis C: The time to relapse during phase 3 will be shorter among adjunctive placebo- than ziprasidone-remitters.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Patients in group 1 will receive Ziprasidone for the full 8 weeks of Phase 2. If they are in remission following phase two, and decide to enter phase three, they will continue on Ziprasidone for 12 months.
Ziprasidone
20mg-80mg a day. Dose increases of 20mg per day may occur at three study visits as directed by clinician. Maximum; 80mg per day per patient.
2
Patients in group 2 will receive Placebo for the full 8 weeks of Phase 2. If they are in remission following phase two, and decide to enter phase three, they will continue on Placebo for 12 months.
Placebo
0mg Placebo per day (1-4 tablets per day). "Dose increases" and "dose decreases" may occur, but patient will remain at 0mg placebo.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ziprasidone
20mg-80mg a day. Dose increases of 20mg per day may occur at three study visits as directed by clinician. Maximum; 80mg per day per patient.
Placebo
0mg Placebo per day (1-4 tablets per day). "Dose increases" and "dose decreases" may occur, but patient will remain at 0mg placebo.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Men or women, 18-65 years of age.
* MDD, current, according to DSM-IV criteria and as diagnosed by the SCID- I/P during the screen and baseline visit of phase 1.
* A HAM-D-17 score \> 14 during the screen and baseline visit of phase 1.
Exclusion Criteria
* Device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy).
* Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician.
* Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease or uncontrolled seizure disorder.
* History of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to the study drug.
* The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past).
* Patients requiring excluded medications (see appendix 1 for details).
* Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features.
* Prior course of ziprasidone, or intolerance to ziprasidone at any dose.
* Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months.
* Have failed more than 3 adequate antidepressant trials during the current MDE. Some examples of adequate dosage of an antidepressant trial include either \> 150 mg of imipramine (or its tricyclic equivalent), \> 60 mg of phenelzine (or its monoamine oxidase inhibitor equivalent), \> 20 mg of fluoxetine (or its SSRI-equivalent), \> 150mg of bupropion, \> 300mg of trazodone (or nefazodone), \>75 mg of venlafaxine, \>60mg of duloxetine, or \> 15mg of mirtazapine. A trial of adequate duration was defined as one during which the patient was on any given antidepressant at an adequate dose for a minimum of 6 weeks.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
George I. Papakostas
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George I Papakostas, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital- Depression Clinical and Research Program
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mischoulon D, Shelton RC, Baer L, Bobo WV, Curren L, Fava M, Papakostas GI. Ziprasidone Augmentation of Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Cardiac, Endocrine, Metabolic, and Motoric Effects in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;78(4):449-455. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10426.
Ionescu DF, Shelton RC, Baer L, Meade KH, Swee MB, Fava M, Papakostas GI. Ziprasidone augmentation for anxious depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Nov;31(6):341-6. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000133.
Papakostas GI, Fava M, Baer L, Swee MB, Jaeger A, Bobo WV, Shelton RC. Ziprasidone Augmentation of Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Efficacy Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;172(12):1251-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101251. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-P-002361
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.