Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Prospective Study Comparing Contour SE™ Microspheres to Embosphere® Microspheres for Treating Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids With Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE) (NCT NCT00628901)
NCT ID: NCT00628901
Last Updated: 2012-07-11
Results Overview
MRI uses a large circular magnet and radio waves to generate signals from atoms in the body. These signals are used to construct images of internal structures. Injection of contrast through an IV is done during the test to enhance the view of the uterus. Contrast enhanced MRI was used as a test in this study to verify if blood supply to the fibroids was blocked or interrupted (devascularization).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
24-hours post study procedure
2012-07-11
Participant Flow
Participants undergoing Uterine Fibroid Embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids at the participating site, that met the study inclusion criteria, were approached for consent for inclusion into the study. Enrollment occurred from February 2006 to December 2009.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
27
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Prospective Study Comparing Contour SE™ Microspheres to Embosphere® Microspheres for Treating Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids With Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=7 Participants
|
42.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous or concurrent gynecological disease(s)
# of participants with concurrent gyneco disease
|
5 partcipants
n=5 Participants
|
7 partcipants
n=7 Participants
|
12 partcipants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous or concurrent gynecological disease(s)
# of participants without concurrent gyneco diseas
|
25 partcipants
n=5 Participants
|
23 partcipants
n=7 Participants
|
48 partcipants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Abnormal Bleeding
|
28 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
27 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
55 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Bulk/pressure
|
20 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
25 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
45 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Pelvic Pain
|
22 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
23 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
45 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Other
|
8 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
10 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
18 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
0 fibroids
|
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
0 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
1 fibroid
|
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
3 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
2 fibroids
|
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
5 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
7 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
3 fibroids
|
10 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
4 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
14 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
4 fibroids
|
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
5 fibroids
|
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
6 fibroids
|
3 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
5 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
7-10 fibroids
|
6 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
5 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
11 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
>10 fibroids
|
3 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
7 particpants
n=7 Participants
|
10 particpants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
0 fibroids
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
1 fibroid
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
2 fibroids
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
3 fibroids
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
4 fibroids
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
5 fibroids
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
6 fibroids
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
7-10 fibroids
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
>10 fibroids
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Submucosal
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Subserosal
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Intramural
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Transmural
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Other, specify
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of fibroid present
Cannot determine
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Dominant fibroid volume
|
203.3 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 275.1 • n=5 Participants
|
141.1 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 179.6 • n=7 Participants
|
172.2 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 232.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Uterine Volume
|
1536.7 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 937.3 • n=5 Participants
|
1491.6 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1456.5 • n=7 Participants
|
1514.2 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1214.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Maximal thickness of junctional zone
|
11.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
|
10.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=7 Participants
|
11.2 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Maximal thickness of the endometrium
|
7.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=5 Participants
|
8.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=7 Participants
|
8.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Minimal thickness of the myometrium
|
11.2 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=5 Participants
|
9.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=7 Participants
|
10.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant adenomyosis
Focal
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant adenomyosis
Diffuse
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Concomitant adenomyosis
Cannot Determine
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of endometrial scar
Yes
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of endometrial scar
No
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of myometrial scar
Yes
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of myometrial scar
No
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Normal
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Mildly Decreased
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Moderately Decreased
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Severly Decreased/Infarcted
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ovaries seen
Yes
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ovaries seen
No
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Adnexal Pathology
Endometrioma/Endometriosis
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Adnexal Pathology
Cyst
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Adnexal Pathology
Other
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Obvious contribution to the uterine blood supply from the ovarian artery
Yes
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Obvious contribution to the uterine blood supply from the ovarian artery
No
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Maximal Thickness of the myometrium
|
26.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=5 Participants
|
25.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=7 Participants
|
25.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24-hours post study procedureMRI uses a large circular magnet and radio waves to generate signals from atoms in the body. These signals are used to construct images of internal structures. Injection of contrast through an IV is done during the test to enhance the view of the uterus. Contrast enhanced MRI was used as a test in this study to verify if blood supply to the fibroids was blocked or interrupted (devascularization).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Fibroid Devascularization Measured by Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
|
29 participants
|
29 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after study procedureMaximum level of nausea was measured using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS). The patient is presented with a picture of a straight line that is 0-10 cm long. The left side of the line (0 cm) represents 'no nausea' and the right side (10cm) of the line represents 'worst nausea imaginable'. The patient is asked to place a mark on the line that represents their level of nausea. For example, a reading of 10cm = worst nausea imaginable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Maximum Level of Nausea
|
5.5 cm
Standard Deviation 3
|
4.8 cm
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after study procedureMaximum level of pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS). The patient is presented with a picture of a straight line that is 0-10 cm long. The left side of the line (0 cm) represents 'no pain' and the right side (10cm) of the line represents 'worst imaginable'. The patient is asked to place a mark on the line that represents their level of pain. For example, a reading of 10cm = worst imaginable pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Maximum Level of Pain
|
6.0 cm
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
5.6 cm
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the study procedure (measured in minutes)Fluoroscopy is the method that provides real-time X ray imaging used for guiding a variety of diagnostic and interventional procedures. Fluoroscopy time is described as the amount of time the patient underwent fluoroscopy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fluoroscopy Time
|
31.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
24.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the study procedure (measured in minutes)Procedure time is the time in minutes of the first arterial puncture to time of hemostasis (stopping bleeding)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure Time
|
102 minutes
Standard Deviation 49.9
|
95.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 39.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the hospitalization stay post UFESummary of investigator reported adverse events and adverse device effects, including all serious adverse events and unanticipated adverse device effects. Adverse events were collected systematically, meaning they were collected during the participant's follow-up visit, during telephone contacts, or during medical record review.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Any Adverse Events That the Participant Experienced
|
68 events
|
58 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineThe UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100. The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
|
64.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6
|
65.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3-monthsThe UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100. The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
|
16.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
22.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsThe UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100.The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=26 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
|
18.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
22.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineThe HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)Subscores
|
42.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.2
|
42.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsThe HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Related Quality of Life Subscores
|
90.0 Scores
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
90.0 Scores
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsThe HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=25 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Related Quality of Life Subscores
|
89.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
89.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
Adverse Events
Contour SE Microspheres
Embosphere Microspheres
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Endometriosis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mallory-Weiss syndrome
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
|
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Incontinence
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic Pain
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural vomiting
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Exfoliation
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular Injury
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vasospasm
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
36.7%
11/30 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
|
Additional Information
Ana Becker / Sr. Clinical Program Manager
Boston Scientific
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor can require changes to the communication to remove any confidential information or other proprietary information of Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER