Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Prospective Study Comparing Contour SE™ Microspheres to Embosphere® Microspheres for Treating Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids With Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE) (NCT NCT00628901)

NCT ID: NCT00628901

Last Updated: 2012-07-11

Results Overview

MRI uses a large circular magnet and radio waves to generate signals from atoms in the body. These signals are used to construct images of internal structures. Injection of contrast through an IV is done during the test to enhance the view of the uterus. Contrast enhanced MRI was used as a test in this study to verify if blood supply to the fibroids was blocked or interrupted (devascularization).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

60 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

24-hours post study procedure

Results posted on

2012-07-11

Participant Flow

Participants undergoing Uterine Fibroid Embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids at the participating site, that met the study inclusion criteria, were approached for consent for inclusion into the study. Enrollment occurred from February 2006 to December 2009.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Overall Study
STARTED
30
30
Overall Study
COMPLETED
27
29
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Prospective Study Comparing Contour SE™ Microspheres to Embosphere® Microspheres for Treating Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids With Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=7 Participants
42.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
n=5 Participants
30 participants
n=7 Participants
60 participants
n=5 Participants
Previous or concurrent gynecological disease(s)
# of participants with concurrent gyneco disease
5 partcipants
n=5 Participants
7 partcipants
n=7 Participants
12 partcipants
n=5 Participants
Previous or concurrent gynecological disease(s)
# of participants without concurrent gyneco diseas
25 partcipants
n=5 Participants
23 partcipants
n=7 Participants
48 partcipants
n=5 Participants
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Abnormal Bleeding
28 particpants
n=5 Participants
27 particpants
n=7 Participants
55 particpants
n=5 Participants
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Bulk/pressure
20 particpants
n=5 Participants
25 particpants
n=7 Participants
45 particpants
n=5 Participants
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Pelvic Pain
22 particpants
n=5 Participants
23 particpants
n=7 Participants
45 particpants
n=5 Participants
Fibroid Related Symptoms
Other
8 particpants
n=5 Participants
10 particpants
n=7 Participants
18 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
0 fibroids
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
0 particpants
n=7 Participants
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
1 fibroid
1 particpants
n=5 Participants
3 particpants
n=7 Participants
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
2 fibroids
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
5 particpants
n=7 Participants
7 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
3 fibroids
10 particpants
n=5 Participants
4 particpants
n=7 Participants
14 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
4 fibroids
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
5 fibroids
2 particpants
n=5 Participants
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
4 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
6 fibroids
3 particpants
n=5 Participants
2 particpants
n=7 Participants
5 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
7-10 fibroids
6 particpants
n=5 Participants
5 particpants
n=7 Participants
11 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present greater than 2cm
>10 fibroids
3 particpants
n=5 Participants
7 particpants
n=7 Participants
10 particpants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
0 fibroids
3 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
1 fibroid
2 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
2 fibroids
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
3 fibroids
3 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
4 fibroids
4 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
5 fibroids
2 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
6 fibroids
3 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
7-10 fibroids
4 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
8 participants
n=5 Participants
Number of fibroids present less than 2 cm
>10 fibroids
7 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Submucosal
16 participants
n=5 Participants
20 participants
n=7 Participants
36 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Subserosal
26 participants
n=5 Participants
24 participants
n=7 Participants
50 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Intramural
28 participants
n=5 Participants
28 participants
n=7 Participants
56 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Transmural
14 participants
n=5 Participants
17 participants
n=7 Participants
31 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Other, specify
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Type of fibroid present
Cannot determine
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Dominant fibroid volume
203.3 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 275.1 • n=5 Participants
141.1 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 179.6 • n=7 Participants
172.2 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 232.5 • n=5 Participants
Uterine Volume
1536.7 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 937.3 • n=5 Participants
1491.6 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1456.5 • n=7 Participants
1514.2 cm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1214.5 • n=5 Participants
Maximal thickness of junctional zone
11.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
10.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=7 Participants
11.2 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=5 Participants
Maximal thickness of the endometrium
7.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=5 Participants
8.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=7 Participants
8.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
Minimal thickness of the myometrium
11.2 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=5 Participants
9.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=7 Participants
10.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=5 Participants
Concomitant adenomyosis
Focal
7 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
12 participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant adenomyosis
Diffuse
2 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant adenomyosis
Cannot Determine
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of endometrial scar
Yes
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of endometrial scar
No
30 participants
n=5 Participants
30 participants
n=7 Participants
60 participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of myometrial scar
Yes
7 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
14 participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of myometrial scar
No
23 participants
n=5 Participants
23 participants
n=7 Participants
46 participants
n=5 Participants
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Normal
30 participants
n=5 Participants
28 participants
n=7 Participants
58 participants
n=5 Participants
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Mildly Decreased
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Moderately Decreased
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Assessment of myometrial perfusion
Severly Decreased/Infarcted
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Ovaries seen
Yes
29 participants
n=5 Participants
29 participants
n=7 Participants
58 participants
n=5 Participants
Ovaries seen
No
1 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Adnexal Pathology
Endometrioma/Endometriosis
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Adnexal Pathology
Cyst
3 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
Adnexal Pathology
Other
2 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Obvious contribution to the uterine blood supply from the ovarian artery
Yes
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Obvious contribution to the uterine blood supply from the ovarian artery
No
30 participants
n=5 Participants
29 participants
n=7 Participants
59 participants
n=5 Participants
Maximal Thickness of the myometrium
26.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=5 Participants
25.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=7 Participants
25.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 24-hours post study procedure

MRI uses a large circular magnet and radio waves to generate signals from atoms in the body. These signals are used to construct images of internal structures. Injection of contrast through an IV is done during the test to enhance the view of the uterus. Contrast enhanced MRI was used as a test in this study to verify if blood supply to the fibroids was blocked or interrupted (devascularization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Number of Participants With Fibroid Devascularization Measured by Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
29 participants
29 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 hours after study procedure

Maximum level of nausea was measured using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS). The patient is presented with a picture of a straight line that is 0-10 cm long. The left side of the line (0 cm) represents 'no nausea' and the right side (10cm) of the line represents 'worst nausea imaginable'. The patient is asked to place a mark on the line that represents their level of nausea. For example, a reading of 10cm = worst nausea imaginable.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Maximum Level of Nausea
5.5 cm
Standard Deviation 3
4.8 cm
Standard Deviation 3.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 hours after study procedure

Maximum level of pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS). The patient is presented with a picture of a straight line that is 0-10 cm long. The left side of the line (0 cm) represents 'no pain' and the right side (10cm) of the line represents 'worst imaginable'. The patient is asked to place a mark on the line that represents their level of pain. For example, a reading of 10cm = worst imaginable pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Maximum Level of Pain
6.0 cm
Standard Deviation 2.9
5.6 cm
Standard Deviation 2.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the study procedure (measured in minutes)

Fluoroscopy is the method that provides real-time X ray imaging used for guiding a variety of diagnostic and interventional procedures. Fluoroscopy time is described as the amount of time the patient underwent fluoroscopy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Fluoroscopy Time
31.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 19.4
24.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 8.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the study procedure (measured in minutes)

Procedure time is the time in minutes of the first arterial puncture to time of hemostasis (stopping bleeding)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Procedure Time
102 minutes
Standard Deviation 49.9
95.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 39.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the hospitalization stay post UFE

Summary of investigator reported adverse events and adverse device effects, including all serious adverse events and unanticipated adverse device effects. Adverse events were collected systematically, meaning they were collected during the participant's follow-up visit, during telephone contacts, or during medical record review.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Any Adverse Events That the Participant Experienced
68 events
58 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

The UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100. The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
64.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6
65.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3-months

The UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100. The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
16.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
22.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

The UFS-QoL asks the subjects feelings and experiences regarding the impact of uterine fibroid symptoms and experiences during the previous 3 months. The scores are added and the final total scores range from 0-100.The lowest actual raw score=8, the highest raw score=40, the possible raw score range=32. A formula is then used to transform the value(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score divided by possible raw score range x100). Higher symptom score values are indicative of greater symptom severity or bother and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity (high scores = bad).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=26 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life Questionaire (UFS-QOL) Score
18.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
22.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

The HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=29 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)Subscores
42.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.2
42.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

The HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Health Related Quality of Life Subscores
90.0 Scores
Standard Deviation 13.1
90.0 Scores
Standard Deviation 11.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

The HRQL subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function were collected from the UFS-QoL. Each individual subscale is added. HRQL Total (sum of 6 subscales); lowest possible raw score = 29, highest possible raw score=145. A formula is used to transform the HRQL raw scores (Highest possible score-actual raw score divided by possible raw score range x 100). Higher scores are indicative of a better HRQL and lower scores indicate a worse HRQL (High=good). The value reported for this measure is the average of all participants scores.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=25 Participants
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=28 Participants
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Health Related Quality of Life Subscores
89.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5
89.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5

Adverse Events

Contour SE Microspheres

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 25 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Embosphere Microspheres

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Endometriosis
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mallory-Weiss syndrome
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Contour SE Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Polyvinyl alcohol Microsphere embolization devices intended to provide targeted vascular occlusion or reduction of blood flow upon selective placement and are currently marketed for use in hypervascular tumors, including leiomyoma uteri and arteriovenous malformations
Embosphere Microspheres
n=30 participants at risk
Biocompatible, hydrophilic, nonresorbable, microspheres used in the embolization of arteriovenous malformations, hypervascular tumors, and symptomatic uterine fibroids.
General disorders
Fatigue
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Renal and urinary disorders
Incontinence
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic Pain
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural vomiting
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Exfoliation
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular Injury
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Vasospasm
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.
36.7%
11/30 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 hours post-procedure, 3 month follow-up, and 12 month follow-up.

Additional Information

Ana Becker / Sr. Clinical Program Manager

Boston Scientific

Phone: 651-581-4605

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor can require changes to the communication to remove any confidential information or other proprietary information of Sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER