A Study of Leuprolide to Treat Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00626431

Last Updated: 2011-07-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

310 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the efficacy and safety of 2 new formulations of leuprolide acetate 45 mg 6-month depot, Formulation A or Formulation B, for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. A formulation will be deemed successful if the percentage of subjects with suppression of testosterone to \<= 50 ng/dL from Week 4 to Week 48 is not less than 87%, (the lower bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval), a protocol-specified criterion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 300 male subjects were planned to be enrolled. Subjects were to receive a total of 2 intramuscular (IM) injections of the same formulation, either Formulation A or Formulation B, administered 24 weeks apart. The first 150 subjects were to receive Formulation A for both injections and the next 150 subjects were to receive Formulation B for both injections. The sponsor was to conduct an ongoing review of the primary endpoint data (suppression of testosterone \<= 50 ng/dL) and planned to stop enrollment of Formulation A or Formulation B, or not to administer the second injection of Formulation A or Formulation B, if 15 or more subjects did not achieve testosterone suppression by Week 4 or failed to maintain testosterone suppression during the treatment period.

All analyses and summaries were to be conducted separately for subjects who received Formulation A or Formulation B.

This study was to be conducted at approximately 60-80 investigative sites. Subjects participated in the trial for approximately 14 months.

This trial was to include a Screening Period (up to 4 weeks), a 12-month Treatment Period (two 6-month treatment cycles), and a Follow-Up Period (30 days).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation A

Leuprolide acetate 45 mg, 6-month depot

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation A

Intervention Type DRUG

Leuprolide acetate was administered as 2 intramuscular (IM) injections of Formulation A, 45 mg 6 month depot, 24 weeks apart.

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation B

Leuprolide acetate, 45 mg, 6-month depot

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation B

Intervention Type DRUG

Leuprolide acetate was administered as 2 intramuscular (IM) injections of Formulation B, 45 mg 6 month depot, 24 weeks apart.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation A

Leuprolide acetate was administered as 2 intramuscular (IM) injections of Formulation A, 45 mg 6 month depot, 24 weeks apart.

Intervention Type DRUG

Leuprolide acetate - Formulation B

Leuprolide acetate was administered as 2 intramuscular (IM) injections of Formulation B, 45 mg 6 month depot, 24 weeks apart.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lupron leuprorelin gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) Lupron leuprorelin gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Voluntarily sign an IRB-approved informed consent form and any required privacy statement/authorization form.
* Pre-trial serum testosterone level \>150 ng/dL.
* Histologically-confirmed prostatic adenocarcinoma in Jewett Clinical Stage A2, B, C or D and TNM\* classification cT1b-4, N: any, M: any.

\*Tumor/Nodes/Metastases
* Subjects with a rising PSA following radical prostatectomy defined as an increase of 0.2 ng/mL from the previous test on two consecutive testings or rising PSA following prostate irradiation using Phoenix Definition of a rise of greater than or equal to 2.0 ng/mL above the nadir.
* Prostate cancer and general clinical status is sufficient to warrant at least 48 weeks of continuous androgen deprivation treatment, without concomitant antiandrogen treatment.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status grades 0,1,or 2 at the time of pre-trial screening.
* Life expectancy of at least 18 months.
* Subjects with serum creatinine ≤1.9 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dL (unless Gilbert's syndrome with normal AST, ALT); AST and ALT ≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal.

Exclusion Criteria

* Requires additional treatment including radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or cryotherapy of local disease.
* Historical, clinical, or radiographic evidence of central nervous system metastases, including spinal cord metastasis.
* Clinical evidence of urinary tract obstruction.
* History of bilateral orchiectomy, adrenalectomy, or hypophysectomy.
* History of clinical hypogonadism.
* Current malignancy or history of malignancy except for prostate cancer or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Clinical or laboratory evidence of any severe underlying disease state (excluding prostate cancer) that would place subjects in additional jeopardy by participating in this trial.
* Hypersensitivity to leuprolide, polylactic acid, or any excipient of the drug.
* Incomplete recovery from the effects of any major surgery.
* History of receiving of the following prostate cancer therapies within 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit: chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antiandrogen, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, strontium, or biological response modifiers.
* History of prostatic surgery within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Received hormonal therapy, including GnRH analogs (less than or equal to 6 month depot administration), estrogen, Megace and phytotherapy, within 32 weeks prior to the Screening Visit and during the trial.
* Alternative medical therapies which have an estrogenic, androgenic, or antiandrogenic effect (including phyto-estrogens and phyto-androgens) within 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit and during the trial.
* Requires the chronic use of systemic corticosteroids and anticonvulsants that may affect bone loss such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, valproic acid or primidone.
* May require antiandrogen, immuno-, or surgical therapy for prostate cancer during the trial.
* History of alcoholism or consumes \>14 alcoholic beverages per week or illicit drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening.
* Received therapy with a GnRH analog (1 year implant) within 60 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Received therapy with finasteride or ketoconazole within 1 week prior to the Screening Visit; dutasteride within 25 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abbott

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristof Chwalisz, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Abbott

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8696

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8681

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8569

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9709

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8662

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8656

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9705

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8691

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8566

Atherton, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8686

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8698

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9703

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8674

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8650

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8699

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8668

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8646

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8652

Middlebury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8697

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8655

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8648

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8660

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8658

Orange City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8664

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8651

Saint Augustine, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8661

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8568

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8679

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8562

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8670

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9708

Thomasville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8693

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8690

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8565

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8676

Greenbelt, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8653

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8667

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8665

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8657

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9702

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8680

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8673

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8666

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8570

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8644

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8663

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8567

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8678

Bethany, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8563

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8692

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8689

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8643

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8695

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8685

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8564

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8645

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8641

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8675

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8684

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8649

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8683

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8672

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8669

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Spitz A, Young JM, Larsen L, Mattia-Goldberg C, Donnelly J, Chwalisz K. Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 6-month depot for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar;15(1):93-9. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.50. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22025196 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

L-PC07-169

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.