Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1234 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-03-26
2029-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that modifiable variables exist at the time of revision ACL reconstruction (e.g., cause of failure, current graft source and type, surgical exposure, and femoral and tibial tunnel position) which will be predictors of patient-reported outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multicenter Orthopaedics Outcomes Network for ACL Reconstructions
NCT00463099
Predictors of Anterior Patellofemoral Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT06185803
Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACL Reconstruction (ACLR): Onsite Follow-up
NCT00478894
M-ARS ACL Post-marketing Surveillance Study
NCT04462458
ACL Reconstruction with a New Generation of LARS Artificial Ligament
NCT06571955
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With this in mind, the Multi-Center ACL Revision Study (MARS) group was established as a multi-center surgeon group to perform a prospective longitudinal cohort analysis of revision ACL reconstruction. This is a mixed group of academic and private practice physicians and has been supported and endorsed by the American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM).
This study focuses on the predictors for ACL revision outcome at 2, 6,10 and 20 years following a patient's revision ACL reconstruction. This will be accomplished by three Specific Aims. Specific Aim 1 will determine the independent predictors of patient-reported quality of life, utilizing a general (SF-36) and knee-specific (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - KOOS) validated outcome instrument. Specific Aim 2 will determine the independent predictors of sports function utilizing three validated outcome instruments (the Marx activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective form - IKDC, and the KOOS sports and recreation subscale). Specific Aim 3 will identify those independent modifiable predictors measured at the time of the revision ACL reconstruction associated with symptoms of knee osteoarthritis at up to 20 years post-surgery. Symptoms will be quantified using the validated survey instrument the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Once the predictors for these worse outcomes are identified, surgeons can be educated in potential modifiable variables to improve the outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All participants must have undergone a primary ACL reconstruction in the past and are currently identified as having experienced failure of their primary ACL reconstruction, as defined by either MRI, knee laxity (KT \> 5mm), a positive pivot shift or Lachman's, functional instability, and/or by arthroscopic confirmation.
* All ACL-deficient patients seeking a revision ACL reconstruction that have either partial (Grade I or II) and/or complete (Grade III) simultaneous ligamentous injuries to the collateral ligaments (MCL or LCL) and/or the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) will also be included.
* Non-operative treatment of patients with ACLR failure are also eligible to participate.
* The following graft types will be the only ones accepted for inclusion:
* any autograft
* Fresh-frozen allografts from a single donor source (Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (MTF); Edison, NJ). These grafts should consist of either:
* bone-patellar tendon-bone
* tibialis anterior/posterior
* achilles tendon
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects will be excluded if their allograft source does not come from MTF.
* Patients unwilling or unable to complete their repeat questionnaire two years after their initial visit.
12 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
NIH
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kurt P. Spindler
Adjoint Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rick W. Wright, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Kurt P. Spindler, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scripps Memorial Hospital (OrthoCal Healthcare)
La Jolla, California, United States
University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA)
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Orthopaedic Associates of Aspen and Glenwood
Aspen, Colorado, United States
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
University of Connecticut Health Center
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
UHZ Sports Medicine Institute
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Intermountain Orthopaedics
Boise, Idaho, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Methodist Sports Medicine Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Cheaspeake Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Regions Hospital (Health Partners Research Foundation)
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Washington University at St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Bridger Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine
Bozeman, Montana, United States
New Hamphsire Knee Center
Holderness, New Hampshire, United States
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Princeton Orthopaedic Associates
Princeton, New Jersey, United States
University of Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
NYU School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States
Manhattan Orthopaedics, P.C.
New York, New York, United States
Keller Army Community Hospital - USMA
West Point, New York, United States
University of North Carolina Medical Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Perry Orthopaedics and Sports Med (Carolinas Healthcare System)
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Slocum Research and Education Foundation
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic
Portland, Oregon, United States
The Rothman Institute / Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Booth, Bartolozzi, Balderston Orthopaedics
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Orthopaedic Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Southeastern Orthopaedics / Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
W.B. Carroll Memorial Clinic
Dallas, Texas, United States
San Antonio Orthopaedic Group
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Vermont College of Medicine
Burlington, Vermont, United States
National Sports Medicine Institute
Lansdowne, Virginia, United States
Town Center Orthopaedic Associates
Reston, Virginia, United States
Commonwealth Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
Vienna, Virginia, United States
Inland Orthopaedics/Washington State University
Pullman, Washington, United States
Royal Columbian Hospital (FraserHealth)
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Clinic/Univ. of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
MARS Group; Vasavada K, Vasavada V, Moran J, Devana S, Lee C, Hame SL, Jazrawi LM, Sherman OH, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Ned Amendola A, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR Jr, Baker CL 3rd, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler V JB, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, David TS, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Gatt CJ Jr, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hannafin JA, Lindsay Harris N Jr, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP 2nd, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda SJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS Jr, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW, York JJ. A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 14;12(11):23259671241291920. doi: 10.1177/23259671241291920. eCollection 2024 Nov.
MARS Group; Cooper DE, Dunn WR, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Spindler KP, Allen CR, Anderson AF, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR Jr, Baker CL 3rd, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler V JB, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ Jr, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL Jr, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP 2nd, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda SJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS Jr, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ, Wright RW. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2836-2841. doi: 10.1177/0363546518777732. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
MARS Group. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1671-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546516644218. Epub 2016 May 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
070110
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.