The Role of Intra-Operative Intracapsular Blocks in Post-Operative Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT00620828

Last Updated: 2015-06-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to use a new combination of anesthesia techniques in an attempt to minimize early pain after surgery and improve the patient's ability to participate more fully with physical therapy. Total knee replacement patients who participate will receive the standard anesthesia. This includes a spinal nerve block as well as a femoral nerve block. The study is looking at the added benefits of including an injection of numbing medication (Bupivicaine) to the back of the knee. This injection occurs during surgery. In order to compare the outcomes we will also have a group of patients who will receive a saline injection as opposed to the numbing medication. Patients are randomly assigned to a group. Outcomes are measured up until twenty-four hours following the surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research Summary

Purpose of Study This prospective, randomized, blinded controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate post-operative pain control and physical therapy outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the use of spinal analgesia and intra-operative posterior capsular injections of ropivicaine 0.5% in conjunction with a continuous femoral nerve catheter.

We believe the results of this study will show an improvement in pain control and physical therapy outcomes compared to traditional methods of analgesia in post-op total knee arthroplasty. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature using this combination of femoral nerve analgesia and posterior capsular injection.

Certainly regional anesthesia methods such as femoral nerve blocks used alone or in conjunction with sciatic nerve blocks have improved patient pain outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty. Several studies have shown a beneficial effect of intra-articular analgesia after capsular closure. We believe our study design will combine the beneficial effects of the aforementioned methods, and ultimately improve patient pain, therapy effort, and safety through less narcotic use.

Our goal is to share these results in a peer-reviewed journal, and at national orthopaedic or anesthesia meetings. The data collected will ideally improve care and safety in the post-operative total knee arthroplasty patient.

Background and Significance Post-operative pain control in total knee arthroplasty is an area of great study in the orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia literature. The use of spinal/epidural alone or in combination with regional anesthesia is well studied in the recent literature. These techniques have significantly improved patient pain management, physical/occupational therapy outcomes, and shortened time to discharge.

Additionally, intra-articular injection of local anesthetic after capsular closure has been studied recently. Several studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of intra-articular local anesthetic on pain outcome measures (6, 8, 9, 10, 15). Although other studies have reported more equivocal results. The impact of capsular analgesia has on post-operative pain is intriguing. Decreased afferent pain perception by the capsular nerves from local anesthetic may improve outcomes, especially in sensory distributions where regional anesthesia is inadequate or not performed.

Much study has centered on regional anesthesia, specifically the use of single shot or continuous femoral nerve blockade (4, 5, 11, 14, 16). Such studies have demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in total narcotic use, sedation scores, and visual analog pain scores. Femoral nerve blockade is now an accepted method of post-op pain control in the total knee arthroplasty patient.

Further investigation has centered on the addition of sciatic nerve blockade to femoral nerve block (1-3, 7, 12, 13). Several studies demonstrate a further improvement in pain outcomes compared to isolated femoral nerve anesthesia. Sciatic nerve blocks can slow physical therapy efforts secondary to a dense motor blockade. Equivocal results have been reported in other studies due to this motor block, however, the sensory component appears to provide improved pain outcome measures.

Femoral nerve blockade is a well-accepted modality for analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. However, femoral nerve block alone does not provide adequate anesthesia to the posterior aspect of the knee. We believe that intra-operative injection of ropivicaine 0.5% into the posterior capsule will provide analgesia analogous to the sensory component of a sciatic nerve block, while eliminating the limiting effects of the motor blockade. The combination of femoral nerve block and intra-operative posterior capsular injection will ideally yield improved pain management and physical therapy efforts above a baseline femoral nerve block.

Design and procedures This is a prospective double-blinded, randomized trial consisting of two study groups: posterior capsular saline injection (control), and the experimental posterior capsular ropivicaine 0.5% injection group. All patients will receive spinal anesthesia and a continuous femoral nerve block. Each group will include 45 patients (n = 90 patients).

All patients will have an elective primary total knee arthroplasty performed. No revision or bilateral cases will be included. Exclusion criteria will include patients with a known allergy to ropivicaine or fentanyl, a known history of narcotic abuse or chronic pain, a known diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy or complex regional pain syndrome, or a significant impediment to physical therapy participation.

Following the informed consent process, patients will receive a continuous femoral nerve block via catheter placed by experienced regional anesthesiologists at our institution. Each patient will also receive spinal anesthesia for intra-operative pain control. A standard midline skin incision with medial para-patellar arthrotomy will be performed followed by implantation of either a Next Gen (Zimmer/Warsaw, IN), or Natural Knee II (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), or Posterior Femoral Component (PFC) Sigma (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) system. Prior to surgery, patients will be randomized to the saline or ropivicaine groups. Both groups will receive their respective injection prior to implantation of the components.

The posterior capsule of the knee will be divided in to four quadrants, each receiving a saline or ropivicaine injection per randomization. Safety measures will include standard pre-injection aspiration to check for vascular blush and intra-operative Doppler ultrasound to identify vascular structures in the posterior knee. Additionally, the anesthesiologist will not be blinded, as he/she will be responsible for assuring the appropriate medication is used, and will be closely monitoring for cardiac arrhythmias in the unlikely event that an intravascular injection occurs. Post-operatively, a standard bulky dressing will be applied. All patients will be weight bearing as tolerated post-operative day 1. A fentanyl PCA will be initiated in the PACU, and will be continued until post-operative day 2. Dosing will be calculated based on lean body mass. Continuous femoral nerve blockade will continue until post-operative day 2 as well.

Outcomes will include total PCA narcotic use, visual analog pain scale with a diagram to localize pain, and Ramsey sedation scores. This data will be collected at the following intervals: in the PACU, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively. We will also measure post-operative day 1 knee range of motion, total ambulation distance, and time to straight leg raise. A standard, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, data collection sheet will be utilized.

We hypothesize that total post-operative narcotic use, visual analog pain scores, and Ramsey sedation scores will be significantly lower in the study group (posterior capsular ropivicaine 0.5% injection). Additionally, we anticipate the knee range of motion, total ambulation distance, and time to straight leg raise to be significantly improved as well.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Block Negative

Subjects receive intra-op saline injection per protocol

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo saline injection

Intervention Type OTHER

20 cc of sterile, injectable saline

Block Positive

Subjects receive intra-op Ropivicaine 0.5% injection per protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivicaine 0.5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivicaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo saline injection

20 cc of sterile, injectable saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Ropivicaine 0.5%

Ropivicaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hospiria

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subject is scheduled to undergo elective total knee replacement at Duke University Hospital.
* The subject has signed the written consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known allergy to ropivacaine or hydromorphone.
* Known history of narcotic abuse or alcohol abuse.
* Known history of chronic pain.
* Known diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy or complex regional pain syndrome.
* Significant impediment to physical therapy participation.
* The surgery is a revision case.
* Patient is undergoing bilateral Total Knee Replacement.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael P Bolognesi, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Adult Reconstructive Surgery

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ben-David B, Schmalenberger K, Chelly JE. Analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: is continuous sciatic blockade needed in addition to continuous femoral blockade? Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):747-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000096186.89230.56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14980931 (View on PubMed)

Cook P, Stevens J, Gaudron C. Comparing the effects of femoral nerve block versus femoral and sciatic nerve block on pain and opiate consumption after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Aug;18(5):583-6. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00198-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12934209 (View on PubMed)

Davies AF, Segar EP, Murdoch J, Wright DE, Wilson IH. Epidural infusion or combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Sep;93(3):368-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh224. Epub 2004 Jul 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15247111 (View on PubMed)

Edwards ND, Wright EM. Continuous low-dose 3-in-1 nerve blockade for postoperative pain relief after total knee replacement. Anesth Analg. 1992 Aug;75(2):265-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199208000-00020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1632541 (View on PubMed)

Hirst GC, Lang SA, Dust WN, Cassidy JD, Yip RW. Femoral nerve block. Single injection versus continuous infusion for total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth. 1996 Jul-Aug;21(4):292-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8837185 (View on PubMed)

Klasen JA, Opitz SA, Melzer C, Thiel A, Hempelmann G. Intraarticular, epidural, and intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Nov;43(10):1021-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.431009.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10593465 (View on PubMed)

Lau HP, Yip KM, Jiang CC. Regional nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. J Formos Med Assoc. 1998 Jun;97(6):428-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9650474 (View on PubMed)

Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Soft tissue and intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine has a beneficial effect after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):125-30. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000147701.24029.cc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15534532 (View on PubMed)

Mauerhan DR, Campbell M, Miller JS, Mokris JG, Gregory A, Kiebzak GM. Intra-articular morphine and/or bupivacaine in the management of pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997 Aug;12(5):546-52. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90178-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9268795 (View on PubMed)

Nechleba J, Rogers V, Cortina G, Cooney T. Continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul;18(3):197-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248181.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16152868 (View on PubMed)

Niskanen RO, Strandberg N. Bedside femoral block performed on the first postoperative day after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study of 49 patients. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul;18(3):192-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248180.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16152867 (View on PubMed)

Pham Dang C, Gautheron E, Guilley J, Fernandez M, Waast D, Volteau C, Nguyen JM, Pinaud M. The value of adding sciatic block to continuous femoral block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.11.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15765454 (View on PubMed)

Szczukowski MJ Jr, Hines JA, Snell JA, Sisca TS. Femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty patients: a method to control postoperative pain. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Sep;19(6):720-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.043.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15343531 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Hirose K, Ishii S. The efficacy of intra-articular analgesia after total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Apr;16(3):306-11. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.21496.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11307127 (View on PubMed)

Wang H, Boctor B, Verner J. The effect of single-injection femoral nerve block on rehabilitation and length of hospital stay after total knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):139-44. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29253.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11915059 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPS# 139715

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00000233

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESPB vs iPACK+ACB in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06302218 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4
Two-level ESPB in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06470542 COMPLETED PHASE4