Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Larazotide Acetate in Subjects With Active Celiac Disease

NCT ID: NCT00620451

Last Updated: 2017-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was an outpatient, randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter, 8-week study with three treatment arms: larazotide acetate 4 mg TID, larazotide acetate 8 mg TID and placebo TID in subjects with celiac disease. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease, as defined by an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio, obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy. Secondary objectives included assessment of the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate, to prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of celiac disease activity (celiac disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole, to To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12 v2) health survey and to assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Celiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
double-blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Larazotide acetate 4 mg

larazotide acetate capsules 4 mg TID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

larazotide acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Larazotide acetate 8 mg

Larazotide acetate capsules 8 mg TID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

larazotide acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Placebo

Placebo capsules

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

larazotide acetate

gelatin capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

gelatin capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AT-1001 INN-202

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female adults with celiac disease (as demonstrated by duodenal/jejunal biopsy or by capsule endoscopy plus positive anti-tTG)
* Marsh score ≥ II at screening
* Positive serum anti-tTG antibodies as determined by screening serology
* Willing to comply with a gluten-free diet for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Has refractory Celiac Disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL-, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.)
* Has chronic active GI disease other than Celiac Disease
* Has diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study
* Has hemoglobin value below 8.5 g/dL
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francisco Leon, MD, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alba Therapeutics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Study Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Torrington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Paoli, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Study Site

Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Study Site

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Study Site

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Study Site

Palma, Mallorca, Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Huesca, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

León, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Study site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Reus, , Spain

Site Status

Study Site

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AT1001-011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id