Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Aripiprazole to Treat Children and Adolescents With Autism (NCT NCT00619190)
NCT ID: NCT00619190
Last Updated: 2014-03-26
Results Overview
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a caregiver rated questionnaire for assessing problem behaviors of children over the past week relative to typically developing children of the same age. Problem behaviors are rated on a categorical scale between 0 not at all a problem and 3 problem is severe in degree. Raters are instructed to consider both the severity and the frequency of the behavior in determining how severe a problem the behavior is. Thus, if a given behavior occurs more often than in other children of the same age and sex, scores greater than or equal to 1 are warranted. The total score can range from a minimum of 0 (no problem behaviors) to a maximum of 174, higher the number the worse the symptoms.The irritability subscale consists of 15 items with a minimal score of 0 - no irritability problems to 45 - all irritability items rated as severe. A rating of 18 or more on the irritability subscale is considered clinically significant.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
30 participants
Baseline to 12 weeks
2014-03-26
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Aripiprazole to Treat Children and Adolescents With Autism
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
n=21 Participants
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
n=9 Participants
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial. They may receive behavioral interventions
|
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.269 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.75 • n=93 Participants
|
11.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=4 Participants
|
9.542 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.272 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeksPopulation: Only 20 out of 21 total participants were analyzed in the aripriprazole group because one participant dropped out before 12 weeks and so the data was not available.
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a caregiver rated questionnaire for assessing problem behaviors of children over the past week relative to typically developing children of the same age. Problem behaviors are rated on a categorical scale between 0 not at all a problem and 3 problem is severe in degree. Raters are instructed to consider both the severity and the frequency of the behavior in determining how severe a problem the behavior is. Thus, if a given behavior occurs more often than in other children of the same age and sex, scores greater than or equal to 1 are warranted. The total score can range from a minimum of 0 (no problem behaviors) to a maximum of 174, higher the number the worse the symptoms.The irritability subscale consists of 15 items with a minimal score of 0 - no irritability problems to 45 - all irritability items rated as severe. A rating of 18 or more on the irritability subscale is considered clinically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
n=20 Participants
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
n=9 Participants
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial. They may receive behavioral interventions
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability at 12 Weeks
|
7.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeksPopulation: Only 20 out of 21 total participants was analyzed in the aripriprazole group because one participant dropped out before 12 weeks and so the data was not available.
One of the most widely used of clinician assessment tools in psychiatry, the CGI is an observer-rated scale that measures illness severity (CGI-S). The CGI is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (among the most severely ill patients).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
n=20 Participants
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
n=9 Participants
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial. They may receive behavioral interventions
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Severity Score (CGI-S)
|
5.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeksPopulation: Only 20 out of 21 total participants was analyzed in the aripriprazole group because one participant dropped out before 12 weeks and so the data was not available.
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist lethargy/social withdrawal subscale (ABC-SW) is the sum of ratings from 0 - not a problem at all to 3 - problem is severe in degree on 16 items within the Aberrant Behavior checklist (also described in the primary outcome measure section above). Scores can range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe problems. The period for the rating is one week and the reference group is typically developing children of the same age and gender as the participant. Both frequency of the behaviors and severity of the problems related to them are considered. High ratings on these items reflect lack of response and interaction with other people in the child's environment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
n=20 Participants
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
n=9 Participants
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial. They may receive behavioral interventions
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Aberrant Behavior Checklist -Lethargy/Social Withdrawal Subscale at 12 Weeks
|
-4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
Adverse Events
Open Aripipraprazole
no Medication Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Open Aripipraprazole
n=21 participants at risk
Openly provided, flexibly dosed aripiprazole in doses from 1mg to 30mg
|
no Medication Control
n=9 participants at risk
group of children whose parents do not want them to take medications for autism over the year following enrollment in the trial. They may receive behavioral interventions
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 21 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 21 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Appetite Increased
|
19.0%
4/21 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Appetite Decreased
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
General disorders
Insomnia
|
23.8%
5/21 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Encopresis
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
33.3%
7/21 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fever
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
General disorders
Nightmares
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
General disorders
Headache/Migraine
|
23.8%
5/21 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
14.3%
3/21 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergies
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Mouth Sores
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
acne
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline to 12 weeks treatment. It was a systematic assessment of adverse effects.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place