Trial Outcomes & Findings for Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Acute Chest Pain Evaluation (NCT NCT00615719)

Results Overview

The presence of ACS was determined by either cardiac angiography, nuclear perfusion imaging or a clinical course deemed consistent with ACS by final chart review. The number of participants with ACS was determined.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Target enrollment

35 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

During the presenting illness, usually within two to three days.

Results posted on

2011-12-08

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure	ED Patients Undergoing Coronary CTA Usefulness of Computed Tomographic (CT) Coronary Angiography (CTCA) to Evaluate Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain (EDCCTA). Patients were to undergo Coronary CT angiography in addition to the nuclear perfusion imaging performed as the standard of care.
Overall Study STARTED	35
Overall Study COMPLETED	30
Overall Study NOT COMPLETED	5

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure	ED Patients Undergoing Coronary CTA Usefulness of Computed Tomographic (CT) Coronary Angiography (CTCA) to Evaluate Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain (EDCCTA). Patients were to undergo Coronary CT angiography in addition to the nuclear perfusion imaging performed as the standard of care.
Overall Study Physician Decision	5

Baseline Characteristics

Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Acute Chest Pain Evaluation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure	ED Patients Undergoing Coronary CTA n=35 Participants Usefulness of Computed Tomographic (CT) Coronary Angiography (CTCA) to Evaluate Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain (EDCCTA). Patients were to undergo Coronary CT angiography in addition to the nuclear perfusion imaging performed as the standard of care.
Age, Categorical <=18 years	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years	35 Participants n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical >=65 years	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Female	17 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Male	18 Participants n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the presenting illness, usually within two to three days.

Population: Only 30 evaluable patients in study powered for 80 patients.

The presence of ACS was determined by either cardiac angiography, nuclear perfusion imaging or a clinical course deemed consistent with ACS by final chart review. The number of participants with ACS was determined.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Chest Pain Evalu n=30 Participants Usefulness of Computed Tomographic (CT) Coronary Angiography (CTCA) to Evaluate Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain (EDCCTA)
The Presence of Acute Coronary Syndromes(ACS).	1 participants

Adverse Events

ED Patients Undergoing Coronary CTA

Serious events: 0 serious events

Other events: 0 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

John D. Grizzard

VCU

Phone: 804-828-8569

Email: [email protected]

Results disclosure agreements

Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
Publication restrictions are in place