Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigating Clinical Efficacy of Ofatumumab in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Had an Inadequate Response to MTX Therapy (NCT NCT00611455)
NCT ID: NCT00611455
Last Updated: 2017-11-06
Results Overview
The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced \>=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
265 participants
Baseline and Week 24
2017-11-06
Participant Flow
Study OFA110635 was comprised of a 24-week Double-blind (DB) Period, followed by a 120-week Open-label (OL) Period. Participants who completed the OL Period, or who were withdrawn, entered a Follow-up (FU) period (approximately 2 years).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5-25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period.
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
STARTED
|
134
|
131
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
121
|
117
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
231
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
52
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
179
|
0
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
260
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
211
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5-25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period.
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
2
|
8
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Randomized in Error; Not Treated
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks)
Randomized, but Not Treated
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Study Closed/Terminated
|
0
|
110
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
|
OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
18
|
0
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met
|
0
|
0
|
23
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Study Closed/Terminated
|
0
|
0
|
80
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
|
Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
Baseline Characteristics
Investigating Clinical Efficacy of Ofatumumab in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Had an Inadequate Response to MTX Therapy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Total
n=260 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.50 • n=93 Participants
|
51.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24 • n=4 Participants
|
52.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
108 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
214 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
|
52 participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 participants
n=4 Participants
|
103 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic/Latino
|
79 participants
n=93 Participants
|
78 participants
n=4 Participants
|
157 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced \>=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24
|
35 participants
|
64 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Population: ITT Population
The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced \>=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Week 4
|
42 participants
|
52 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Week 8
|
43 participants
|
66 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Week 12
|
44 participants
|
71 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Week 16
|
38 participants
|
67 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Week 20
|
40 participants
|
62 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population
The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced \>=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 4
|
13 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 8
|
12 participants
|
23 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 12
|
14 participants
|
36 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 16
|
13 participants
|
37 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 20
|
19 participants
|
31 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 24
|
14 participants
|
35 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population
The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced \>=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 4
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 8
|
3 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 12
|
6 participants
|
19 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 16
|
5 participants
|
18 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 20
|
6 participants
|
18 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 24
|
3 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percent (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of \>=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of \>=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient \[pt\] pain assessment, pt global assessment \[GA\], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = minimum(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 4, n=129, 124
|
6.0 percent change
Interval -77.0 to 85.0
|
13.0 percent change
Interval -98.0 to 92.0
|
—
|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 8, n=130, 126
|
5.5 percent change
Interval -250.0 to 86.0
|
22.0 percent change
Interval -264.0 to 84.0
|
—
|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 12, n=130, 126
|
0.5 percent change
Interval -200.0 to 85.0
|
25.0 percent change
Interval -73.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 16, n=130, 126
|
0.0 percent change
Interval -210.0 to 85.0
|
26.0 percent change
Interval -138.0 to 93.0
|
—
|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 20, n=130, 126
|
4.0 percent change
Interval -185.0 to 90.0
|
21.0 percent change
Interval -74.0 to 92.0
|
—
|
|
Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Week 24, n=130, 126
|
-2.5 percent change
Interval -272.0 to 90.0
|
21.0 percent change
Interval -87.0 to 95.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 4, n=129, 124
|
4.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.241
|
4.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.099
|
—
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 8, n=130, 126
|
4.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.205
|
4.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.285
|
—
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 12, n=130, 126
|
4.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.333
|
4.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.367
|
—
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 16, n=130, 126
|
4.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.327
|
4.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.296
|
—
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 20, n=130, 126
|
4.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.387
|
4.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.395
|
—
|
|
Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)
Week 24, n=130, 126
|
4.98 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.437
|
4.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.270
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, n=129, 124
|
-0.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.053
|
-1.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.886
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, n=130, 126
|
-0.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.992
|
-1.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.112
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, n=130, 126
|
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.221
|
-1.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.255
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, n=130, 126
|
-0.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.194
|
-1.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.166
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, n=130, 126
|
-0.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
|
-1.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.262
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, n=130, 126
|
-0.65 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.218
|
-1.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.201
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, n=129, 124
|
5.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.332
|
5.51 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.127
|
—
|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, n=130, 126
|
5.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.289
|
5.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.276
|
—
|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, n=130, 126
|
5.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.349
|
4.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.358
|
—
|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, n=130, 126
|
5.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.329
|
4.81 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.310
|
—
|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, n=130, 126
|
5.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.414
|
4.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.427
|
—
|
|
Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, n=130, 126
|
5.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.439
|
4.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.360
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, n=129, 124
|
-0.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
|
-1.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.891
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, n=130, 126
|
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.048
|
-1.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, n=130, 126
|
-1.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.211
|
-1.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.257
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, n=130, 126
|
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.183
|
-1.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.189
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, n=130, 126
|
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.175
|
-1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.304
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, n=130, 126
|
-0.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.203
|
-1.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.264
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2 to \>5.1 or change from baseline \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2 to \<=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline \<=0.6 or change from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, Good; n=129, 124
|
15 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, Moderate; n=129, 124
|
41 participants
|
63 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, None; n=129, 124
|
73 participants
|
49 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, Good; n=130, 126
|
16 participants
|
22 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
49 participants
|
62 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, None; n=130, 126
|
65 participants
|
42 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, Good; n=130, 126
|
17 participants
|
32 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
51 participants
|
56 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, None; n=130, 126
|
62 participants
|
38 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, Good; n=130, 126
|
16 participants
|
32 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
51 participants
|
58 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, None; n=130, 126
|
63 participants
|
36 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, Good; n=130, 126
|
17 participants
|
34 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
41 participants
|
52 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, None; n=130, 126
|
72 participants
|
40 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, Good; n=130, 126
|
18 participants
|
32 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
37 participants
|
60 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, None; n=130, 126
|
75 participants
|
34 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2 to \>5.1 or change from baseline \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2 to \<=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline \<=0.6 or change from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, Good; n=129, 124
|
6 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, Moderate; n=129, 124
|
49 participants
|
50 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 4, None; n=129, 124
|
74 participants
|
69 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, Good; n=130, 126
|
7 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
53 participants
|
67 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 8, None; n=130, 126
|
70 participants
|
51 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, Good; n=130, 126
|
7 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
57 participants
|
63 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 12, None; n=130, 126
|
66 participants
|
46 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, Good; n=130, 126
|
4 participants
|
15 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
58 participants
|
70 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 16, None; n=130, 126
|
68 participants
|
41 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, Good; n=130, 126
|
8 participants
|
22 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
45 participants
|
63 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 20, None; n=130, 126
|
77 participants
|
41 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, Good; n=130, 126
|
4 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, Moderate; n=130, 126
|
44 participants
|
67 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant
Week 24, None; n=130, 126
|
82 participants
|
45 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of \>=0.22.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=117 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=112 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 24 According to the Self-Assessed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
|
59 participants
|
74 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population
Participants achieving clinical remission were defined as those with a low disease activity, i.e., DAS28 score (using CRP) \<2.6 at Week 24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=129 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24
|
7 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24
|
-5 number of tender joints
Interval -38.0 to 36.0
|
-12 number of tender joints
Interval -52.0 to 20.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24
|
-4.50 number of swollen joints
Interval -24.0 to 16.0
|
-8.00 number of swollen joints
Interval -43.0 to 12.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=119 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score at Week 24
|
-5 scores on a scale
Interval -93.0 to 54.0
|
-22 scores on a scale
Interval -95.0 to 35.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24
|
-6.0 scores on a scale
Interval -76.0 to 57.0
|
-16.5 scores on a scale
Interval -83.0 to 28.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=124 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24
|
-9.50 scores on a scale
Interval -70.0 to 37.0
|
-20.50 scores on a scale
Interval -77.0 to 17.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The self-assessed HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=122 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 24
|
-0.25 scores on a scale
Interval -2.4 to 1.3
|
-0.38 scores on a scale
Interval -2.4 to 1.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from Baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24
|
-0.10 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -55.1 to 96.2
|
-4.85 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -96.2 to 30.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=126 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24
|
-5 millimeters per hour (mm/hr)
Interval -57.0 to 89.0
|
-15 millimeters per hour (mm/hr)
Interval -85.0 to 34.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 \[poorer health\] to 100 \[better health\]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=117 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=116 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24
Physical Component Summary
|
4.21 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.048
|
6.69 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.031
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24
Physical Functioning
|
3.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.125
|
5.70 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.100
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24
Role Physical
|
5.43 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.259
|
6.64 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.231
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24
Bodily Pain
|
3.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.197
|
8.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.170
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24
General Health
|
2.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.033
|
4.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.011
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 \[poorer health\] to 100 \[better health\]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=117 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=116 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24
Mental Component Summary
|
1.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.308
|
4.60 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.272
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24
Vitality
|
2.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.169
|
7.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.154
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24
Social Functioning
|
3.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.361
|
4.98 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.331
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24
Role Emotional
|
2.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.612
|
4.93 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.563
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24
Mental Health
|
2.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.278
|
5.40 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.249
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued."
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=111 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=114 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24
|
2 scores on a scale
Interval -37.0 to 27.0
|
6 scores on a scale
Interval -19.0 to 42.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=115 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24
Anti-CCP, n=120, 115
|
0.0 Units/Liter
Interval -1613.0 to 4042.0
|
-138.0 Units/Liter
Interval -13000.0 to 762.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24
RF-IgA, n=119, 110
|
0.0 Units/Liter
Interval -79.0 to 72.0
|
-3 Units/Liter
Interval -93.0 to 3.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24
RF-IgG, n=119, 110
|
0.0 Units/Liter
Interval -71.0 to 58.0
|
-4.8 Units/Liter
Interval -87.0 to 9.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24
RF-IgM, n=119, 110
|
0.0 Units/Liter
Interval -68.0 to 98.0
|
-6.3 Units/Liter
Interval -93.0 to 98.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
The following biomarkers were assessed: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Serum Amyloid A. These biomarkers were used to further characterize disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=115 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of IL-6 and Serum Amyloid A at Week 24
IL-6, n=119, 115
|
-0.410 nanogram per liter (ng/l)
Interval -131.26 to 2632.66
|
-4.040 nanogram per liter (ng/l)
Interval -106.98 to 63.44
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Levels of IL-6 and Serum Amyloid A at Week 24
Serum Amyloid A, n=120, 114
|
-10850.5 nanogram per liter (ng/l)
Interval -1680680.0 to 3374580.0
|
-53513.5 nanogram per liter (ng/l)
Interval -3724434.0 to 931790.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: As Treated (AT) Population: all participants who received at least one infusion of ofatumumab in the DB and/or OL Period. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
4.01 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.396
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
3.59 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.227
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
3.36 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.225
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
3.50 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.175
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
3.34 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.326
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
3.82 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.588
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
5.34 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.038
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
3.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.321
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
3.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.142
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
2.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.156
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
2.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.161
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
2.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.362
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
3.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.401
|
—
|
|
Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
4.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.003
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 \<=3.2, moderate if 3.2\< DAS28 \<=5.1, or high if DAS28 \> 5.1. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=238 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, n=0, 238, 0
|
—
|
-2.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.192
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, n=0, 194, 0
|
—
|
-1.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.072
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, n=0, 129, 0
|
—
|
-1.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.203
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
-1.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.065
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
-1.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
-1.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.845
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.696
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 \<=3.2, moderate if 3.2\< DAS28 \<=5.1, or high if DAS28 \> 5.1. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=237 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
-1.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.081
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
-1.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.036
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
-1.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.710
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, n=0, 237, 0
|
—
|
-2.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.166
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, n=0, 193, 0
|
—
|
-1.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.020
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, n=0, 125, 0
|
—
|
-1.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.144
|
—
|
|
Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.200
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: AT Population
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \<2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score \>=2.6 and \<3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Remission, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
38 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
33 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Remission, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
47 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
33 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Remission, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
40 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
31 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Remission, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
15 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
20 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Remission, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
13 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
4 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Remission, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
3 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Remission, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)Population: AT Population
The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28\<=3.2), moderate (3.2\<DAS28\<=5.1), or high (DAS28\>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 \<2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \<2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score \>=2.6 and \<3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Remission, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
30 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
44 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Remission, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
71 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Remission, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
71 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
36 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Remission, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
63 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
21 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
11 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Remission,n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Low Disease Activity,n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
4 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Remission,n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
4 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Low Disease Activity,n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Remission, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Low Disease Activity, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants who were retreated from Week 24 were analyzed.
Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=198 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
34.26 Weeks
Standard Deviation 15.828
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
34.50 Weeks
Standard Deviation 15.151
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
28.83 Weeks
Standard Deviation 10.713
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
20.82 Weeks
Standard Deviation 6.952
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
19.94 Weeks
Standard Deviation 5.411
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
17.86 Weeks
Standard Deviation 0.404
|
—
|
|
Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
NA Weeks
Standard Deviation NA
Data are not available because there was no subsequent treatment course after Treatment Course 7.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144Population: AT Population
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold \>=2%) and SAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 1, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
212 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 2, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
151 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 3, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
91 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 4, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any AE, TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 1, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 2, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 3, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 4, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 5, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 6, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Any SAE, TC 7, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga \[10\^9\] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=237 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 8, n=0, 237, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 16, n=0, 182, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 24, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 32, n=0, 96, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 40, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 48, n=0, 46, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 56, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 64, n=0, 23, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 72, n=0, 19, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 80, n=0, 15, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 88, n=0, 13, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 96, n=0, 12, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 104, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 112, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 120, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 128, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 136, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 144, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 8, n=0, 194, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 16, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 24, n=0, 150, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 32, n=0, 97, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 40, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 48, n=0, 58, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 56, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 64, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 72, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 80, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 88, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 96, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 104, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 112, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 120, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 128, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 8, n=0, 132, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 16, n=0, 119, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 24, n=0, 92, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 32, n=0, 63, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 40, n=0, 35, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 48, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 56, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 64, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 72, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 80, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 88, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 96, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 104, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 8, n=0, 70, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 16, n=0, 53, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 24, n=0, 37, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 32, n=0, 25, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 40, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 48, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 8, n=0, 30, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 16, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 24, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 32, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 40, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 8, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 16, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 24, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 32, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 8, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 16, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga \[10\^9\] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=237 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 8, n=0, 237, 0
|
—
|
197 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 16, n=0, 182, 0
|
—
|
156 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 24, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
152 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 32, n=0, 96, 0
|
—
|
88 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 40, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 48, n=0, 46, 0
|
—
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 56, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 64, n=0, 23, 0
|
—
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 72, n=0, 19, 0
|
—
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 80, n=0, 15, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 88, n=0, 13, 0
|
—
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 96, n=0, 12, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 104, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 112, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 120, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 128, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 136, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 144, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 8, n=0, 194, 0
|
—
|
170 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 16, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
155 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 24, n=0, 150, 0
|
—
|
128 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 32, n=0, 97, 0
|
—
|
82 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 40, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 48, n=0, 58, 0
|
—
|
48 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 56, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 64, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 72, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 80, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 88, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 96, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 104, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 112, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 120, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 128, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 8, n=0, 132, 0
|
—
|
118 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 16, n=0, 119, 0
|
—
|
105 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 24, n=0, 92, 0
|
—
|
81 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 32, n=0, 63, 0
|
—
|
57 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 40, n=0, 35, 0
|
—
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 48, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 56, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 64, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 72, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 80, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 88, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 96, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 104, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 8, n=0, 70, 0
|
—
|
66 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 16, n=0, 53, 0
|
—
|
49 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 24, n=0, 37, 0
|
—
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 32, n=0, 25, 0
|
—
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 40, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 48, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 8, n=0, 30, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 16, n=0, 27, 0
|
—
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 24, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 32, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 40, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 8, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 16, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 24, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 32, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 8, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 16, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga \[10\^9\] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=237 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 48, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 8, n=0, 237, 0
|
—
|
209 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 16, n=0, 182, 0
|
—
|
163 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 24, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
150 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 32, n=0, 96, 0
|
—
|
89 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 40, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
50 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 48, n=0, 46, 0
|
—
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 56, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 64, n=0, 23, 0
|
—
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 72, n=0, 19, 0
|
—
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 80, n=0, 15, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 88, n=0, 13, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 96, n=0, 12, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 104, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 112, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 120, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 128, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 136, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 144, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 8, n=0, 194, 0
|
—
|
174 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 16, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
162 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 24, n=0, 150, 0
|
—
|
136 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 32, n=0, 97, 0
|
—
|
85 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 40, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
63 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 48, n=0, 58, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 56, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 64, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 72, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 80, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 88, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 96, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 104, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 112, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 120, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 128, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 8, n=0, 132, 0
|
—
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 16, n=0, 119, 0
|
—
|
108 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 24, n=0, 92, 0
|
—
|
81 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 32, n=0, 63, 0
|
—
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 40, n=0, 35, 0
|
—
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 48, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 56, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 64, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 72, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 80, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 88, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 96, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 104, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 8, n=0, 70, 0
|
—
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 16, n=0, 53, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 24, n=0, 37, 0
|
—
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 32, n=0, 25, 0
|
—
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 40, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 8, n=0, 30, 0
|
—
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 16, n=0, 27, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 24, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 32, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 40, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 8, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 16, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 24, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 32, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 8, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 16, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga \[10\^9\] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=237 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 48, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 56, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 8, n=0, 237, 0
|
—
|
216 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 16, n=0, 182, 0
|
—
|
166 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 24, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
160 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 32, n=0, 96, 0
|
—
|
90 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 40, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 48, n=0, 46, 0
|
—
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 56, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 64, n=0, 23, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 72, n=0, 19, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 80, n=0, 15, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 88, n=0, 13, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 96, n=0, 12, 0
|
—
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 104, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 112, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 120, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 128, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 136, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 1, Week 144, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 8, n=0, 194, 0
|
—
|
181 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 16, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
164 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 24, n=0, 150, 0
|
—
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 32, n=0, 97, 0
|
—
|
91 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 40, n=0, 69, 0
|
—
|
65 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 48, n=0, 58, 0
|
—
|
54 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 56, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 64, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 72, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 80, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 88, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 96, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 104, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 112, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 120, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 2, Week 128, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 8, n=0, 132, 0
|
—
|
128 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 16, n=0, 119, 0
|
—
|
113 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 24, n=0, 92, 0
|
—
|
88 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 32, n=0, 63, 0
|
—
|
61 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 40, n=0, 35, 0
|
—
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 64, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 72, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 80, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 88, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 96, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 3, Week 104, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 8, n=0, 70, 0
|
—
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 16, n=0, 53, 0
|
—
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 24, n=0, 37, 0
|
—
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 32, n=0, 25, 0
|
—
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 40, n=0, 8, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 4, Week 48, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 8, n=0, 30, 0
|
—
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 16, n=0, 27, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 24, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 32, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 5, Week 40, n=0, 3, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 8, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 16, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 24, n=0, 7, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 6, Week 32, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 8, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TC 7, Week 16, n=0, 1, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=243 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 4, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 5, BL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 4, BL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 1, BL, <LLN, n=0, 242, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 1, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 242, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 1, BL, <LLN, n=0, 242, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 1, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 242, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 1, BL, <LLN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 1, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 243, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 2, BL, <LLN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 2, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 2, BL, <LLN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 2, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 2, BL, <LLN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 2, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 4, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 198, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 3, BL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 3, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 3, BL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 3, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 3, BL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 3, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 136, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 4, BL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 4, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 4, BL, <LLN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 5, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 5, BL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 5, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 5, BL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 5, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 6, BL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 6, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 6, BL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 6, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 6, BL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 6, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 7, BL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 7, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
DBP, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 7, BL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 7, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
SBP, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 7, BL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 7, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HR, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=225 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 48, normal, n=0, 225, 0
|
—
|
150 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 48, abnormal CS, n=0, 225, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 48, abnormal NCS, n=0, 225, 0
|
—
|
71 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 48, NR, n=0, 225, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 72, normal, n=0, 202, 0
|
—
|
133 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 72, abnormal CS, n=0, 202, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 72, abnormal NCS, n=0, 202, 0
|
—
|
67 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 72, NR, n=0, 202, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 96, normal, n=0, 180, 0
|
—
|
119 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 96, abnormal CS, n=0, 180, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 96, abnormal NCS, n=0, 180, 0
|
—
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 96, NR, n=0, 180, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 120, normal, n=0, 167, 0
|
—
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 120, abnormal CS, n=0, 167, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 120, abnormal NCS, n=0, 167, 0
|
—
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 120, NR, n=0, 167, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 144, normal, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 144, abnormal CS, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 144, abnormal NCS, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period
Week 144, NR, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential CC (CC Low \[relative to the lower limit of normal\], CC High \[relative to the upper limit of normal\]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3, ; Chloride: 0.9, 1.1; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Sodium: 0.93, 1.07; Total protein: 0.8, 1.15; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=239 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 1,PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 234, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 2,PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 117, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 176, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 135, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 116, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Chloride, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 10, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Albumin, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALT, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
ALP, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
AST, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TBIL, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Calcium, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CO2/BCO, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
CK, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Creatinine, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
GGT, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
LDH, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Potassium, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Sodium, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Total Protein, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Urea/BUN, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Uric acid, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low \[relative to lower limit of normal\], CC High \[relative to upper limit of normal\]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Lymphocytes: 0.4, 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.75, 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=239 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 4,PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 5,PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 5, BL, CC low, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 5, PBL, CC low, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 5, BL, CC high, n=0, 29, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 5, PBL, CC high, n=0, 31, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 6,PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 6, BL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 6, BL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 6, PBL, CC high, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 221, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 1,PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 171, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 173, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 172, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 177, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 196, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 170, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 172, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 171, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 171, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 2,PBL, CC high, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 2, BL, CC low, n=0, 171, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 2, PBL, CC low, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 2, BL, CC high, n=0, 171, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 2, PBL, CC high, n=0, 195, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 114, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 115, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 115, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 117, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 115, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 115, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 114, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 114, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 3,PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 3, BL, CC low, n=0, 114, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 3, PBL, CC low, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 3, BL, CC high, n=0, 114, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 3, PBL, CC high, n=0, 134, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 67, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 4, PBL, CC low, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 4, BL, CC high, n=0, 65, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 4, PBL, CC high, n=0, 72, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 4, BL, CC low, n=0, 66, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 6, PBL, CC low, n=0, 11, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
PC, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
RBC count, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 7, BL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
TNUE, TC 7,PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 7, BL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 7, PBL, CC low, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
WBC count, TC 7, PBL, CC high, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 1, BL, CC high, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Eosinophils, TC 1, PBL, CC high, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
HCT, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 224, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Hb, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 1, BL, CC low, n=0, 232, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course
Lymphocytes, TC 1, PBL, CC low, n=0, 239, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline up to Week 144Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Only those parameters for a particular flag (\<LLN or \>ULN) are summarized if at least one value was outside the specified reference range. The Baseline (BL) value for a TC was defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. However to be evaluable as a baseline value, assessments must have been conducted within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A. The post-baseline (PBL) was any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. The pre-defined LLN for biomarkers are: B-lymphocyte stimulator (B-ls):\<486.5 nanograms per Liter (ng/L); Interleukin-6 (IL-6):\<0.31ng/L and Serum amyloid A: \<1951 ng/mL. LLN was not defined for Rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgA, RF-IgG, RF-IgM or anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody and RF. The pre- defined ULN range for biomarkers (RF)-IgA: \>6 units; RF-IgG:\>6 units; RF-IgM:\>6 units; Anti-CCP:\>19.9999 units; B-ls:\>1343.3 ng/L; IL-6: \>5 ng/L; RF:\>11.9999 kilounits (KU)/L; Serum amyloid A:\>82432 ng/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
n=205 Participants
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 169, 0
|
—
|
93 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 205, 0
|
—
|
173 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 169, 0
|
—
|
129 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 207, 0
|
—
|
185 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 1, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 206, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 203, 0
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 205, 0
|
—
|
144 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 52, 0
|
—
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 45, 0
|
—
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 4, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 205, 0
|
—
|
137 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 205, 0
|
—
|
114 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 169, 0
|
—
|
67 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 168, 0
|
—
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 1, BL, <LLN, n=0, 203, 0
|
—
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 206, 0
|
—
|
167 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 138, 0
|
—
|
79 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 1, BL, >ULN, n=0, 204, 0
|
—
|
129 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 1, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 138, 0
|
—
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 111, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 111, 0
|
—
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 59, 0
|
—
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 111, 0
|
—
|
80 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 60, 0
|
—
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 111, 0
|
—
|
93 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 2, BL, <LLN, n=0, 81, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 2, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 88, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 81, 0
|
—
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 88, 0
|
—
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 2, BL, >ULN, n=0, 52, 0
|
—
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 23, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 2, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 95, 0
|
—
|
61 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 20, 0
|
—
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 94, 0
|
—
|
78 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 3, BL, <LLN, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 3, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 16, 0
|
—
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 4, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 3, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 3, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 21, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 43, 0
|
—
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 14, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 4, BL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 18, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 4, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 4, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 17, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 24, 0
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 5, BL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 5, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 5, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 5, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 5, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 6, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 6, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 6, 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 6, 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 9, 0
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 6, BL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 6, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 6, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 6, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgA, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgG, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
RF IgM, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 2, 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Anti-CCP, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 7, BL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 7, PBL, <LLN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
B-ls, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Il-6, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
IL-6, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 7, BL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)
Serum amyloid A, TC 7, PBL, >ULN, n=0, 0, 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV])Population: Safety Follow-up Population: all participants who withdrew from the Double-blind Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the Double-blind Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the Open-label Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of Open-label date.
A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=224 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period
|
—
|
—
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=220 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgA <LLN
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgA >ULN
|
—
|
—
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgG <LLN
|
—
|
—
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgG >ULN
|
—
|
—
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgM <LLN
|
—
|
—
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period
IgM >ULN
|
—
|
—
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=133 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab
Relative to first dose, n=0, 0, 133
|
—
|
—
|
22.998 Months
Interval 0.43 to 56.64
|
|
Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab
Relative to last dose, n=0, 0, 128
|
—
|
—
|
13.832 Months
Interval 3.06 to 54.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV)Population: AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicated the presence of JC Virus.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=243 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period
|
—
|
—
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years)Population: AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed.
Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low \[relative to the lower limit of normal\], CC High \[relative to the upper limit of normal\]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; Creatinine: N/A, 1.2; CO2/BCO: 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=224 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
ALT
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
ALP
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
CK
|
—
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
CO2/BCO
|
—
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
GGT
|
—
|
—
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
Creatinine
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
Urea/BUN
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years)Population: AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed.
Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low \[relative to lower limit of normal\], CC High \[relative to upper limit of normal\]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks).
|
Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period
n=224 Participants
Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
Eosinophils
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
Total neutrophils
|
—
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period
Platelet count
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo: DB Period
Ofatumumab 700 mg: DB and OL Periods
Placebo or Ofatumumab 700 mg: Follow-up Period
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo: DB Period
n=130 participants at risk
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving placebo in the DB Period. Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period.
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg: DB and OL Periods
n=243 participants at risk
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving ofatumumab 700 mg in either the DB or OL Period. Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course).
|
Placebo or Ofatumumab 700 mg: Follow-up Period
n=224 participants at risk
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving either placebo or ofatumumab 700 mg in the Follow-up Period. Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis bacterial
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.82%
2/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.82%
2/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot deformity
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.82%
2/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia supraventricular
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Axillary vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
B-cell lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharospasm
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bunion
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac aneurysm
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic stenosis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave inversion
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endometritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gingival cancer
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis B
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incisional hernia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Metrorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myasthenia gravis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pertusis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Polyneuropathy
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Post cholecystectomy syndrome
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Troponin T increased
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.41%
1/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Empyema
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic necrosis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subcutaneous haematoma
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.45%
1/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo: DB Period
n=130 participants at risk
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving placebo in the DB Period. Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams \[mg\]/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period.
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg: DB and OL Periods
n=243 participants at risk
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving ofatumumab 700 mg in either the DB or OL Period. Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week \[oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous\] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course).
|
Placebo or Ofatumumab 700 mg: Follow-up Period
n=224 participants at risk
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving either placebo or ofatumumab 700 mg in the Follow-up Period. Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
36.6%
89/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
18.5%
45/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.9%
9/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
11.1%
27/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.2%
8/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
8.2%
20/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.3%
3/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
14.0%
34/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
1.5%
2/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
10.7%
26/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
17.7%
43/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.8%
5/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
8.2%
20/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.3%
3/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
6.2%
15/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
4.5%
11/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.3%
3/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
8.2%
20/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.1%
4/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.8%
5/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
8.2%
20/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.1%
4/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
5.3%
13/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
|
1.5%
2/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.1%
4/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.3%
8/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
|
1.5%
2/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
5.3%
13/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
3.1%
4/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
7.4%
18/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
9.9%
24/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
4.1%
10/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
3.1%
4/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
4.9%
12/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.77%
1/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.9%
7/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
2.3%
3/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
5.3%
13/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
2.3%
3/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.9%
7/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.9%
7/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.7%
9/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.3%
8/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.3%
8/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.3%
8/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
3.3%
8/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.9%
7/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctiviitis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.5%
6/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
General disorders
Drug intolerance
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash generalised
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/130 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
2.1%
5/243 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
0.00%
0/224 • Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER