Administration of High Dose Thiotepa and Melphalan With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Children and Adolescents With Solid Tumors
NCT ID: NCT00607984
Last Updated: 2008-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intra-arterial Chemotherapy for Children With Retinoblastoma
NCT00906113
TEAM (Thiotepa, Etoposide, Cytosar, Melphalan ) for AutoSCT in Lymphoma
NCT03346096
Pharmacogenetically Based Dosing of Thiopurines in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT01678508
CH14.18 1021 Antibody and IL2 After Haplo SCT in Children With Relapsed Neuroblastoma
NCT02258815
Adjuvant High-Dose Thiotepa and Stem Cell Rescue Associated With Conventional Chemotherapy in Relapsed Osteosarcoma
NCT00978471
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The paradigm for successfully utilization of autologous stem cell transplantation is childhood neuroblastoma. A large, well performed, randomized study in children with high risk neuroblastoma showed that application of autologous stem cell transplant can lead to improved disease free and overall survival, effects that were further augmented by the administration of biological agents with specific activity against this tumor. Smaller non-controlled studies and case series have shown that ASCT is feasible in children with solid tumors or with tumors of the central nervous system. Despite the many reports in the literature, there is little agreement among investigators as to the ideal combination of chemotherapeutic agents that should be included in the high dose chemotherapy regimen administered prior to ASCT for these patients. The choice of agents in these protocols is dictated by the use of drugs whose dose limiting toxicity is hematopoietic, a concern that is obviated by the subsequent infusion of autologous stem cells. As such, the majority of HDC protocols exploit the steep dose response curve of alkylating agents, where administration of high doses had usually been limited by fear of inducing permanent myeloablation.
A major limitation of many HDC protocols is that many of the alkylating agents that are used have already been utilized in front line protocols. A further problem in the design of HDC protocols that is unique to patients suffering from CNS tumors, is that the administered agents must traverse the blood brain barrier (BBB) in order to reach the site of the tumor.
A major breakthrough in the the application of HDC in children nwith CNS tumors occurred with the use of Thiotepa, a highly myeloablative bifunctional alkylating agent that partitions equally across the BBB. Thiotepa is now a mainstay of all HDC protocols for children with CNS tumors.
Hara et al. pioneered a novel combination of Thiotepa with Melpahlan, also an alkylating agent, in the treatment of children with a variety of solid tumors. They catalogued the toxicity of this protocol, and suggested a dose level of each drug in the combination that led to toxicity levels of grade ≤3. Of note, in the Hara series, some patients also received high dose Busulfan.
We piloted the Hara protocol in our center on 14 patients and found that the dose levels suggested in their study were not tolerated well by children in our center. We decided to modify the Hara protocol by reducing the doses of both Thiotepa and Melphalan to reduce the incidence of severe gastrointestinal toxicity that our patients experienced. In addition, after two patients succumbed to fulminant gram positive infections on the original protocol, we instituted the empiric administration of Vancomycin for primary treatment of febrile neutropenia in these patients, pending the results of blood cultures. We also decided to restrict admission to the protocol to patients with minimal amounts of residual disease as measured by MRI / CT scan or biochemical markers prior to transplant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
single
thiotepa melphalan
thiotepa 900 mg per meter squared total, on days -11,-10,-4,-3 melphalan 140 mg per meter squared total on days -11,-10,-4,-3 autologous stem cell transplant in day 0
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
thiotepa melphalan
thiotepa 900 mg per meter squared total, on days -11,-10,-4,-3 melphalan 140 mg per meter squared total on days -11,-10,-4,-3 autologous stem cell transplant in day 0
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CNS tumors, hepatic tumors and other solid tumors that are chemosensitive
* Minimal disease as determined by either radiological studies or biochemical markers (as determined by treating physician).
* Consent of patient or surrogate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No known HIV or AIDS infection
* No active bacterial, fungal, or viral infection
* No medical condition that would preclude study treatment
* Positive pregnancy test or failure to use contraceptives.
* Creatinine \>1.5 times limit of normal for age
* SGOT or SGPT more than 3 times normal.
1 Year
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rabin Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jerry Stein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Schneider Children's Medical Center, Israel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
Petah Tikva, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3990
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.