Trial Outcomes & Findings for Transdermal Rotigotine User Surveillance Study (NCT NCT00599339)

NCT ID: NCT00599339

Last Updated: 2018-08-09

Results Overview

The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) Part III (Motor Examination) contains 31 questions. Each question ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 4 (worst outcome). The total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 124 (worst outcome).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

2195 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From Baseline to Visit 7 (Month 33)

Results posted on

2018-08-09

Participant Flow

The study started to enroll subjects in June 2006. Overall, 2195 patients were enrolled in this study (Enrolled Set \[ES\]), of which 2179 were treated with rotigotine or another Parkinson's disease treatment according to the study protocol at least once (Safety Set \[SS\]).

There were 36 patients without valid data consent. Therefore only Safety data were analyzed for these 36 patients. Patients without valid data consent or an unknown study termination status were neither considered as completer nor as non-completer in the Clinical Study Report. These patients are considered as non-completers in the summary below.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Overall
For this study, 5 groups of patients with different Parkinson's disease treatments were to be considered. Initial treatments were to include dopaminergic monotherapy with rotigotine, other dopamine agonists (eg, pramipexole, cabergoline, ropinirole), or L-dopa, treatment with L-dopa combined with rotigotine or other dopamine agonists. Treatment was to be performed according to standard medical practice. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
2195
Overall Study
Safety Set
2179
Overall Study
COMPLETED
1531
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
664

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Overall
For this study, 5 groups of patients with different Parkinson's disease treatments were to be considered. Initial treatments were to include dopaminergic monotherapy with rotigotine, other dopamine agonists (eg, pramipexole, cabergoline, ropinirole), or L-dopa, treatment with L-dopa combined with rotigotine or other dopamine agonists. Treatment was to be performed according to standard medical practice. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
79
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
137
Overall Study
Other Reason
179
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
221
Overall Study
No valid data consent
36
Overall Study
Study Termination Status Unknown
12

Baseline Characteristics

Transdermal Rotigotine User Surveillance Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Overall
n=2159 Participants
For this study, 5 groups of patients with different Parkinson's disease treatments were to be considered. Initial treatments were to include dopaminergic monotherapy with rotigotine, other dopamine agonists (eg, pramipexole, cabergoline, ropinirole), or L-dopa, treatment with L-dopa combined with rotigotine or other dopamine agonists. Treatment was to be performed according to standard medical practice. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
724 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1435 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
956 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1203 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline to Visit 7 (Month 33)

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) Part III (Motor Examination) contains 31 questions. Each question ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 4 (worst outcome). The total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 124 (worst outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=203 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=145 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=10 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=233 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=400 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=377 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=35 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=36 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III at Visit 7 (Month 33)
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
-2.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.1
-5.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.9
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.2
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.8
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.2
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.9
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
20.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.7
-3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline to Visit 7 (Month 33)

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) question 32 of part IV asks. "What Proportion of the waking day are dyskinesias present?" Answers range from 0 (None) to 4 (76-100 % of the day).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=204 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=145 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=10 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=233 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=400 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=377 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=35 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=37 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Question 32 of Part IV at Visit 7 (Month 33)
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline to Visit 7 (Month 33)

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) Part IV question 33 asks for complications of therapy in the past week, through the question "How disabling are the dyskinesias ? " Answers range from 0 (Not disabling) to 4 (Completely disabling).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=204 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=145 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=10 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=233 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=400 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=377 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=35 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=37 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Question 33 of Part IV at Visit 7 (Month 33)
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
-0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 33 months

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) Part IV question 39 asks "What proportion of the waking day is the patient "off", on average?" Answers range from 0 (None) to 4 (76-100 % of the day).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=204 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=145 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=10 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=233 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=400 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=377 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=35 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=37 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Question 39 of Part IV at Visit 7 (Month 33)
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
-0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 33 months

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The NADCS assesses sleep-related motor complaints including nocturnal akinesia, dystonia and painful cramps by an ordinal severity scale. The NADCS total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 4 (maximum severity). NADCS value was missing for one subject at Visit 7.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=204 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=145 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=10 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=232 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=400 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=376 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=34 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=37 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Dystonia Cramp Score (NADCS) at Visit 7 (Month 33)
-0.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.79
1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.51
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.48
0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
-0.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
-0.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
-0.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.90
3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.60
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
0.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 33 months

Population: All enrolled and treated patients, having at least one valid on-treatment measurement in any efficacy variable are included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study.

The Hoehn and Yahr staging of Parkinson's disease in the "on" stage, if applicable, had to be completed by the physician. Possible staging: * 0 No signs of disease * 1 Unilateral disease * 2 Bilateral disease without impairment of balance * 3 Mild to moderate bilateral disease, some postural instability, physically dependent * 4 Severe disability, still able to walk or stand unassisted * 5 Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=207 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
n=146 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=234 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=23 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=401 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=6 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=378 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=11 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
n=36 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
n=2 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
n=13 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
n=37 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
0
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
1
55 participants
1 participants
48 participants
0 participants
29 participants
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
29 participants
2 participants
37 participants
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
2
112 participants
4 participants
76 participants
6 participants
118 participants
12 participants
7 participants
1 participants
186 participants
2 participants
192 participants
2 participants
15 participants
1 participants
7 participants
19 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
3
28 participants
4 participants
19 participants
4 participants
70 participants
8 participants
5 participants
0 participants
131 participants
2 participants
119 participants
4 participants
13 participants
0 participants
1 participants
11 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
4
8 participants
2 participants
2 participants
0 participants
14 participants
2 participants
1 participants
0 participants
46 participants
0 participants
24 participants
4 participants
3 participants
1 participants
1 participants
3 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
5
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
3 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
6 participants
0 participants
4 participants
1 participants
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Hoehn & Yahr Stage at Visit 7 (Month 33)
No Data/Missing
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 33 months

Population: For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.

The analysis was performed for the non-disjunctive classification into patients at risk to develop an Adverse Event associated with Rotigotine and patients at risk to develop an Adverse Event not associated with Rotigotine.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Neupro Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
n=1390 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Neupro Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
n=1328 Participants
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
L-Dopa Monotherapy (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Neupro + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with Neupro and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with Neupro and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Other Dopamine Agonist + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with other dopamine agonist and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Multiple Dopamine Agonists + L-Dopa (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily treated with multiple dopamine agonists and L-Dopa at Baseline.
Not Treated (>= 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for 3 months or more at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Not Treated (< 3 Months)
This group shows all subjects which were not treated for less than 3 months at Visit 7. Patients were to be given a treatment for Parkinson's disease deemed appropriate by the physician, and the treatment could be modified by the physician at any time during the study. Thus, subjects presented in this group weren't necessarily not treated at Baseline.
Reported Adverse Events of Cardiac Valve Fibrosis During the Study (up to 33 Months)
Cardiac valve disease
1 Adverse Events
1 Adverse Events
Reported Adverse Events of Cardiac Valve Fibrosis During the Study (up to 33 Months)
Cardiac valve sclerosis
0 Adverse Events
2 Adverse Events
Reported Adverse Events of Cardiac Valve Fibrosis During the Study (up to 33 Months)
Aortic valve sclerosis
1 Adverse Events
0 Adverse Events

Adverse Events

Associated With Rotigotine

Serious events: 261 serious events
Other events: 237 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Not Associated With Rotigotine

Serious events: 269 serious events
Other events: 245 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Associated With Rotigotine
n=1390 participants at risk
A patient was analyzed related to Adverse Events (AEs) associated with Rotigotine only if during the study he was at risk to develop an AE associated with Rotigotine. An Adverse Event was considered to be associated with Rotigotine if Rotigotine was administered at least once within 30 days prior to the onset of the adverse event. "Associated Event" does not necessarily mean related to treatment with Rotigotine.
Not Associated With Rotigotine
n=1328 participants at risk
A patient was analyzed related to Adverse Events (AEs) not associated with Rotigotine only if during the study he was at risk to develop an AE not associated with Rotigotine. An adverse event was considered not to be associated with Rotigotine, if no Rotigotine was administered in the 30 days period prior to the onset of the AE.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemorrhagic anaemia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.50%
7/1390 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.53%
7/1328 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.68%
9/1328 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory distress
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Bradyarrhythmia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery restenosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block third degree
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve incompetence
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Tricuspid valve incompetence
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve sclerosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Hypertensive heart disease
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac valve disease
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Thyroiditis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Cushing's syndrome
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Acromegaly
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Goitre
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Eye disorders
Cataract
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Eye disorders
Retinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Eye disorders
Macular degeneration
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
0.36%
5/1390 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.38%
5/1328 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecal incontinence
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal fistula
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mechanical ileus
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis necrotising
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecaloma
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Coeliac disease
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Varices oesophageal
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic pseudocyst
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Death
0.50%
7/1390 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.38%
5/1328 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Sudden death
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Orthostatic intolerance
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Unevaluable event
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Pain
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Gait disturbance
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Application site rash
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Drug intolerance
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cirrhosis alcoholic
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Autoimmune hepatitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis alcoholic
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Gallbladder disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.60%
8/1328 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis acute
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Abscess intestinal
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Rectal abscess
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Urethritis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Laryngotracheo bronchitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Tracheobronchitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia staphylococcal
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Arthritis infective
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Intervertebral discitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Endocarditis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Opportunistic infection
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Norwalk virus
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pseudomembranous colitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Mycotoxicosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Helicobacter gastritis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Necrotising fasciitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonas infection
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.58%
8/1390 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.60%
8/1328 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.36%
5/1390 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cervical vertebral fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dislocation of vertebra
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Clavicle fracture
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Forearm fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus lesion
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device dislocation
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dislocation of joint prosthesis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Implantable defibrillator malfunction
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pelvic fracture
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Acetabulum fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic brain injury
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural site reaction
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pharyngeal injury
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vertebral injury
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Feeding tube complication
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brachial plexus injury
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fracture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Investigations
Heart rate increased
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Investigations
Investigation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.50%
7/1390 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus non-insulin-dependent
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypochloraemia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Starvation
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.65%
9/1390 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.75%
10/1328 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.60%
8/1328 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mobility decreased
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Posture abnormal
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
0.43%
6/1390 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.45%
6/1328 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc disorder
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.38%
5/1328 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Exostosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteosclerosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteochondrosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovial cyst
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator cuff syndrome
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer recurrent
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic carcinoma of the bladder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer recurrent
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer recurrent
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm malignant
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cell carcinoma stage unspecified
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign neoplasm of thyroid gland
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon neoplasm
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pituitary tumour benign
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Genital neoplasm malignant female
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastrointestinal carcinoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon adenoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Meningeal neoplasm
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm of conjunctiva
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal adenocarcinoma metastatic
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gammopathy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostatic adenoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign neoplasm of bladder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder neoplasm
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine cancer
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Parkinson's disease
2.8%
39/1390 • Number of events 47 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
2.4%
32/1328 • Number of events 38 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Parkinsonism
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.58%
8/1390 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.53%
7/1328 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic cerebral infarction
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar haematoma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar infarction
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.65%
9/1390 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Dementia
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.38%
5/1328 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Progressive supranuclear palsy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral hypoperfusion
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Hypokinesia
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Dyskinesia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Movement disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Multiple system atrophy
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Fine motor delay
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Pseudoradicular syndrome
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord haemorrhage
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Reversible ischaemic neurological deficit
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Lumbar radiculopathy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Polyneuropathy
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Coma
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Diabetic hyperosmolar coma
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Phrenic nerve paralysis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonic epilepsy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Autonomic nervous system imbalance
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Dystonia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Hypertensive encephalopathy
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Normal pressure hydrocephalus
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Drop attacks
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Monoparesis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.60%
8/1328 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, visual
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Disorientation
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Nervousness
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep attacks
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Somatoform disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Cyclothymic disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Binge eating
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Impulse-control disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Mental disorder due to a general medical condition
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Hypersexuality
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Post-traumatic stress disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.23%
3/1328 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute prerenal failure
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure chronic
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral stenosis
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder disorder
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Neurogenic bladder
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal prolapse
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Epididymitis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hyperventilation
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pickwickian syndrome
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary congestion
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pyoderma gangrenosum
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioneurotic oedema
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Therapy regimen changed
0.22%
3/1390 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Device therapy
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Drug therapy changed
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalisation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Rehabilitation therapy
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Surgical and medical procedures
Deep brain stimulation
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.30%
4/1328 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.29%
4/1390 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Femoral arterial stenosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery occlusion
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Iliac artery stenosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Subclavian artery stenosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Hypovolaemic shock
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.14%
2/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Arterial occlusive disease
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.15%
2/1328 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Varicose ulceration
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm rupture
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis
0.07%
1/1390 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.00%
0/1328 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Vascular disorders
Femoral artery aneurysm
0.00%
0/1390 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
0.08%
1/1328 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Associated With Rotigotine
n=1390 participants at risk
A patient was analyzed related to Adverse Events (AEs) associated with Rotigotine only if during the study he was at risk to develop an AE associated with Rotigotine. An Adverse Event was considered to be associated with Rotigotine if Rotigotine was administered at least once within 30 days prior to the onset of the adverse event. "Associated Event" does not necessarily mean related to treatment with Rotigotine.
Not Associated With Rotigotine
n=1328 participants at risk
A patient was analyzed related to Adverse Events (AEs) not associated with Rotigotine only if during the study he was at risk to develop an AE not associated with Rotigotine. An adverse event was considered not to be associated with Rotigotine, if no Rotigotine was administered in the 30 days period prior to the onset of the AE.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
7.6%
105/1390 • Number of events 120 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
6.4%
85/1328 • Number of events 101 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
General disorders
Fatigue
4.8%
67/1390 • Number of events 76 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
5.8%
77/1328 • Number of events 82 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
3.5%
49/1390 • Number of events 60 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
5.0%
67/1328 • Number of events 79 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
3.9%
54/1390 • Number of events 55 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.
5.4%
72/1328 • Number of events 74 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected during the course of the study from Baseline (Visit 1) up to Visit 7 (Month 33 ± 30 days).
For analysis of Safety the patients in the Safety Set were sub-grouped into patients at risk developing an Adverse Event (AE) associated with rotigotine and patients at risk developing an AE not associated with rotigotine. This sub-grouping is non-disjunctive in nature, i.e. one patient might fall into both subgroups.

Additional Information

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

UCB

Phone: +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60