Trial Outcomes & Findings for Neuropsychometric Outcome After Carotid Endarterectomy (NCT NCT00597883)

NCT ID: NCT00597883

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Results Overview

Neuropsychometric performance change is measured in Z-scores by compared to a reference group of elderly patients \> 60 years having "simple" spine surgery. The Z-scores were generated as follows. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the change scores (neurocognitive performance after surgery minus neurocogntivie performance before surgery \[baseline\]) was calculated for the reference group of patients. The mean and SD from the reference group was used to generate Z-scores: The mean change score from the reference group of patients was subtracted from the change scores in for each CEA patient for each test and divided by the SD of the change scores of the reference group of patients.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

817 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to Day 1

Results posted on

2025-11-21

Participant Flow

Patients having CEA surgery were recruited independently of patients in the reference group, who were having "simple" spine surgery. Therefore, the 155 patients having "simple" spine surgery were not double counted.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CEA Patients
Consecutive patients were enrolled who were having elective carotid endarterectomy. Performance in these patients were based on testing before and after CEA at two time points: one and thirty days after surgery. The difference in performance on a battery of neuropsychometric tests was scored by comparing the mean and standard deviation in the change scores to a reference consisting of patients having "simple" spine surgery defined as microdiskectomy or one or two level laminectomies lasting less than four hours, not requiring blood transfusions and not needing to be admitted to the intensive care unit.
Reference Group
Patients had "simple" spine surgery instead of Carotid endarterectomy
Overall Study
STARTED
662
155
Overall Study
COMPLETED
662
155
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Neuropsychometric Outcome After Carotid Endarterectomy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CEA Patients
n=662 Participants
Consecutive patients were enrolled who were having elective carotid endarterectomy. Performance in these patients were based on testing before and after CEA at two time points: one and thirty days after surgery. The difference in performance on a battery of neuropsychometric tests was scored by comparing the mean and standard deviation in the change scores to a reference consisting of patients having "simple" spine surgery defined as microdiskectomy or one or two level laminectomies lasting less than four hours, not requiring blood transfusions and not needing to be admitted to the intensive care unit.
Reference Group
n=155 Participants
Patients had "simple" spine surgery instead of Carotid endarterectomy
Total
n=817 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Age
72 years
n=68 Participants
71 years
n=76 Participants
72 years
n=48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
232 Participants
n=68 Participants
55 Participants
n=76 Participants
287 Participants
n=48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
430 Participants
n=68 Participants
100 Participants
n=76 Participants
530 Participants
n=48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
42 Participants
n=48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
18 Participants
n=48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
602 Participants
n=68 Participants
155 Participants
n=76 Participants
757 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
0 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
4 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
0 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
18 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
578 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
578 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=76 Participants
10 Participants
n=48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
52 Participants
n=68 Participants
155 Participants
n=76 Participants
207 Participants
n=48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
662 participants
n=68 Participants
155 participants
n=76 Participants
817 participants
n=48 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1

Neuropsychometric performance change is measured in Z-scores by compared to a reference group of elderly patients \> 60 years having "simple" spine surgery. The Z-scores were generated as follows. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the change scores (neurocognitive performance after surgery minus neurocogntivie performance before surgery \[baseline\]) was calculated for the reference group of patients. The mean and SD from the reference group was used to generate Z-scores: The mean change score from the reference group of patients was subtracted from the change scores in for each CEA patient for each test and divided by the SD of the change scores of the reference group of patients.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CEA Patients
n=662 Participants
Consecutive patients were enrolled who were having elective carotid endarterectomy. Performance in these patients were based on testing before and after CEA at two time points: one and thirty days after surgery. The difference in performance on a battery of neuropsychometric tests was scored by comparing the mean and standard deviation in the change scores to a reference consisting of patients having "simple" spine surgery defined as microdiskectomy or one or two level laminectomies lasting less than four hours, not requiring blood transfusions and not needing to be admitted to the intensive care unit.
Reference Group
n=155 Participants
Patients had spine surgery
Percentage of Patients Having a Significant Change in Neuropsychometric Performance After Carotid Endarterectomy
22 percentage of participants
4.5 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Reference Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CEA Patients

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 12 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Reference Group
n=155 participants at risk
Patients had "simple" spine surgery instead of Carotid endarterectomy
CEA Patients
n=662 participants at risk
Consecutive patients were enrolled who were having elective carotid endarterectomy. Performance in these patients were based on testing before and after CEA at two time points: one and thirty days after surgery. The difference in performance on a battery of neuropsychometric tests was scored by comparing the mean and standard deviation in the change scores to a reference consisting of patients having "simple" spine surgery defined as microdiskectomy or one or two level laminectomies lasting less than four hours, not requiring blood transfusions and not needing to be admitted to the intensive care unit.
Vascular disorders
Stroke
0.00%
0/155 • 11 years
All patients were examined with a battery of neuropsychometric tests before and after having carotid endarterectomy surgery.
1.8%
12/662 • Number of events 12 • 11 years
All patients were examined with a battery of neuropsychometric tests before and after having carotid endarterectomy surgery.

Additional Information

Eric J Heyer

Columbia University

Phone: 212-305-9072

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place