Trial Outcomes & Findings for Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Methyl Aminolevulinate (MAL) Cream in Moderate to Severe Acne (NCT NCT00594425)

NCT ID: NCT00594425

Last Updated: 2013-08-08

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

150 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 weeks after last treatment

Results posted on

2013-08-08

Participant Flow

First patient entered: February 07, 2007 Last patient last visit (12 week follow-up: July 07, 2008 Last patient last visit (24 week follow-up: September 22, 2008 15 medical derm clinics

Washout periods for prior acne treatment: 14 days for any topical treatment (except medicated cleansers), 1 month for oral antibiotics; 6 months for oral isotretinoin. Patients using birth control pills must have used the same product and dose for at least 6 months and had to agree to stay with the same product and dose for an additional 6 months.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
80 mg/g MAL PDT
Vehicle PDT
Overall Study
STARTED
50
48
52
Overall Study
COMPLETED
43
34
42
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
7
14
10

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Methyl Aminolevulinate (MAL) Cream in Moderate to Severe Acne

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Total
n=150 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
39 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age Continuous
21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.24 • n=5 Participants
20.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.81 • n=7 Participants
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.00 • n=5 Participants
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.05 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
91 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants
n=5 Participants
48 participants
n=7 Participants
52 participants
n=5 Participants
150 participants
n=4 Participants
Inflammatory lesion count
34.2 lesions
n=5 Participants
32.1 lesions
n=7 Participants
31.2 lesions
n=5 Participants
32.5 lesions
n=4 Participants
Non inflammatory lesion count
39.1 lesions
n=5 Participants
35.9 lesions
n=7 Participants
35.2 lesions
n=5 Participants
36.7 lesions
n=4 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score
IGA SCORE 3 (MODERATE ACNE)
35 participants
n=5 Participants
41 participants
n=7 Participants
44 participants
n=5 Participants
120 participants
n=4 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score
IGA SCORE 4 (SEVERE ACNE)
15 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
8 participants
n=5 Participants
30 participants
n=4 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin type
Fitzpatrick skin type score I
4 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=4 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin type
Fitzpatrick skin type score II
11 participants
n=5 Participants
11 participants
n=7 Participants
15 participants
n=5 Participants
37 participants
n=4 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin type
Fitzpatrick skin type score III
21 participants
n=5 Participants
24 participants
n=7 Participants
23 participants
n=5 Participants
68 participants
n=4 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin type
Fitzpatrick skin type score IV
14 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
13 participants
n=5 Participants
36 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: ITT population

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Success, Defined as Improvement of at Least 2 Grades From Baseline According to the IGA Scale Based on Facial Assessment
16 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.34 to 28.51
14.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.25 to 27.17
11.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 22.97

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: ITT population

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Change in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules) Lesion Counts
-10.72 lesions
Interval -14.45 to -6.99
-9.27 lesions
Interval -13.25 to -5.3
-8.08 lesions
Interval -11.8 to -4.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=42 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=33 Participants
Proportion of Success, Defined as Improvement of at Least 2 Grades From Baseline According to the IGA Scale Based on Facial Assessment
17.5 percentage of participants
Interval 6.72 to 27.84
21.2 percentage of participants
Interval 8.75 to 31.95
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 10.68 to 37.75

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=42 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=33 Participants
Change in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules) Lesion Counts From Baseline
-10.95 lesions
Interval -15.18 to -6.72
-11.8 lesions
Interval -16.65 to -6.95
-10.62 lesions
Interval -15.12 to -6.12

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=33 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=42 Participants
Median Percentage Change in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules) Lesion Counts From Baseline
-44.5 Percentage change
Full Range 39,32 • Interval -89.0 to 42.0
-56.0 Percentage change
Full Range 44-34 • Interval -95.0 to 44.0
-40.5 Percentage change
Full Range 34-41 • Interval -100.0 to 71.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=33 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=42 Participants
Median Percentage Change in Facial Inflammatory (Nodules, Papules, and Pustules) Lesion Counts From Baseline
-52.0 Percentage change
Interval -92.0 to 88.0
-69.5 Percentage change
Interval -95.0 to 45.0
-52.0 Percentage change
Interval -96.0 to 71.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=33 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=42 Participants
Median Percentage Change in Facial Non Inflammatory Lesion Counts From Baseline
-38.5 Percentage change
Interval -89.0 to 160.0
-48.0 Percentage change
Interval -95.0 to 104.0
-38.0 Percentage change
Interval -100.0 to 225.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=32 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=41 Participants
Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts From Baseline
-40 Percentage change
Interval -88.0 to 66.0
-54 Percentage change
Interval -87.0 to 68.0
-37 Percentage change
Interval -94.0 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=42 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=33 Participants
Proportion of Success, Defined as Improvement of at Least 2 Grades From Baseline According to the IGA Scale Based on Facial Assessment
10.5 Precentage of participants
18.8 Precentage of participants
12.2 Precentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: PP population: excludes all patients with major protocol deviations (consists of the following types of events: Baseline inflammatory lesion count other than 20-100, received less that 4 treatments, primary efficacy criteria missing at week 12, insufficient primary efficacy follow up time, prohibited concomitant medication (retinoid).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=40 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=33 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=42 Participants
The Proportion of Patients Rated as Clear or Almost Clear at 12 Weeks After Last Treatment
10.0 percentage of participants
18.2 percentage of participants
11.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after illumination-first treatment

Population: Safety

Measure was assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 cm

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Facial Pain Using Visual Analouge Scale From 0 to 10, Were 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates Worst Pain.
2.05 cm
Interval 0.0 to 10.0
2.25 cm
Interval 0.0 to 9.0
0.00 cm
Interval 0.0 to 3.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after second treatment

Population: Safety

Measure was assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 cm

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=41 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=50 Participants
Facial Pain Using Visual Analouge Scale From 0 to 10, Were 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates Worst Pain
2.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 7.5
3.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
0.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after third treatment

Population: Safety

Measure was assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 cm

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=48 Participants
Facial Pain Using Visual Analouge Scale From 0 to 10, Were 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates Worst Pain.
1.5 cm
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
2.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
0.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 1.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after illumination-fourth treatment treatment

Population: Safety

Measure was assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 cm

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=45 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=37 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=46 Participants
Facial Pain Using Visual Analouge Scale From 0 to 10, Were 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates Worst Pain.
1.10 cm
Interval 0.0 to 6.4
2.50 cm
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
0.0 cm
Interval 0.0 to 2.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Erythema After First Treatment
75.1 percentage of participants
61.7 percentage of participants
17.6 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 days after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Erythema After First Treatment
44.9 percentage of participants
44.7 percentage of participants
17.6 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after second treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Erythema After Second Treatment
67.4 percentage of participants
65.8 percentage of participants
18.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after third treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Erythema After Third Treatment
67.4 percentage of participants
71.1 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after fourth treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=54 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Erythema After Fourth Treatment
45.9 percentage of participants
63.1 percentage of participants
15.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=52 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema After First Treatment
0.0 percentage of participants
2.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 days after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=49 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=47 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema 2 Days After First Treatment
2.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 7 days after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema 7 Days After First Treatment
2.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after second treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=41 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=50 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema After Second Treatment
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after third treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=48 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema After Third Treatment
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately after fourth treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=45 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=46 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Severe Erythema After Fourth Treatment
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 days after treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=47 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hyperpigmentation After First Treatment
6.3 percentage of participants
4.3 percentage of participants
5.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=49 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hyperpigmentation After First Treatment
2.0 percentage of participants
10.8 percentage of participants
5.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=45 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hyperpigmentation After Last Treatment
8.6 percentage of participants
21.1 percentage of participants
4.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=44 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=37 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=43 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hyperpigmentation After Last Treatment
6.8 percentage of participants
8.1 percentage of participants
9.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=45 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=45 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hyperpigmentation After Last Treatment
4.4 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 days after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=47 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hypopigmentation After First Treatment
2.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=45 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hypopigmentation After Last Treatment
4.4 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
2.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks after first treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=49 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=46 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=51 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hypopigmentation After First Treatment
2.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=44 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=37 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=43 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hypopigmentation After Last Treatment
2.3 percentage of participants
2.7 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks after last treatment

Population: Safety

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=45 Participants
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=38 Participants
Vehicle PDT
n=45 Participants
Proportion of Patients With Mild and Moderate Hypopigmentation After Last Treatment
2.2 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

40 mg/g MAL PDT

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 50 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

80 mg/g MAL PDT

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 46 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Vehicle PDT

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 38 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 participants at risk
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 participants at risk
Vehicle PDT
n=52 participants at risk
Infections and infestations
CELLULITIS STAPHYLOCOCCAL
2.0%
1/50
0.00%
0/48
0.00%
0/52
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
PREGNANCY
2.0%
1/50
0.00%
0/48
0.00%
0/52
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
ABORTION SPONTANEOUS
2.0%
1/50
0.00%
0/48
0.00%
0/52

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
40 mg/g MAL PDT
n=50 participants at risk
80 mg/g MAL PDT
n=48 participants at risk
Vehicle PDT
n=52 participants at risk
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE DISCOLOURATION
6.0%
3/50
14.6%
7/48
5.8%
3/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE DRYNESS
2.0%
1/50
6.2%
3/48
0.00%
0/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE ERYTHEMA
80.0%
40/50
72.9%
35/48
32.7%
17/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE EXFOLIATION
6.0%
3/50
6.2%
3/48
0.00%
0/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE IRRITATION
62.0%
31/50
54.2%
26/48
7.7%
4/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE PAIN
64.0%
32/50
64.6%
31/48
9.6%
5/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE PARAESTHESIA
6.0%
3/50
18.8%
9/48
7.7%
4/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE PRURITUS
26.0%
13/50
20.8%
10/48
9.6%
5/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE SCAB
6.0%
3/50
6.2%
3/48
0.00%
0/52
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
APPLICATION SITE WARMTH
4.0%
2/50
0.00%
0/48
7.7%
4/52
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
0.00%
0/50
2.1%
1/48
7.7%
4/52
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
6.0%
3/50
2.1%
1/48
1.9%
1/52
Immune system disorders
SEASONAL ALLERGY
0.00%
0/50
6.2%
3/48
1.9%
1/52
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
0.00%
0/50
8.3%
4/48
7.7%
4/52
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
18.0%
9/50
6.2%
3/48
17.3%
9/52
Nervous system disorders
Headache
4.0%
2/50
4.2%
2/48
0.00%
0/52

Additional Information

David Pariser MD

Virginia Clinical Research, Inc

Phone: 757-625-0151

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee All data from the study are free for publication. However if publication of the results may endanger adequate patent protection for new principles,compounds,or formulations,Photocure has the right to decide when the results are free to be published. Before this agreed time, no data from the trial will be published, presented, or communicated, except to regulatory authorities and ethics committees. Both the investigators and Photocure will be given 30 days to review and comment.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER