Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials: Lucentis-Avastin Trial (NCT NCT00593450)

NCT ID: NCT00593450

Last Updated: 2017-08-21

Results Overview

Visual acuity testing was performed with the Electronic Visual Tester (EVA) following the ETDRS protocol. VA score is measured as number of letters read correctly. The VA score change is the difference of the VA score at 1 Year and the VA score at baseline. In this study, the outcome VA score change is ranged from -71 to 52, with the higher VA score change the better visual acuity improvement.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

1208 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 1 Year

Results posted on

2017-08-21

Participant Flow

Note: The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for CATT recommended excluding the data for all patients (N=23) from one center because of serious protocol non-compliance. Unless specified otherwise, only the 1185 patients enrolled by the remaining 43 centers are included in analyses.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Overall Study
STARTED
301
286
298
300
Overall Study
COMPLETED
284
265
285
271
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
17
21
13
29

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials: Lucentis-Avastin Trial

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=301 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=286 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=298 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=300 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Total
n=1185 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
79.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=5 Participants
80.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=7 Participants
78.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=5 Participants
79.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=4 Participants
79.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=21 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
11 participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
33 participants
n=5 Participants
28 participants
n=7 Participants
31 participants
n=5 Participants
34 participants
n=4 Participants
126 participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
102 participants
n=5 Participants
84 participants
n=7 Participants
115 participants
n=5 Participants
103 participants
n=4 Participants
404 participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Customized
80-89 years
142 participants
n=5 Participants
150 participants
n=7 Participants
126 participants
n=5 Participants
142 participants
n=4 Participants
560 participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Customized
>=90 years
22 participants
n=5 Participants
23 participants
n=7 Participants
20 participants
n=5 Participants
19 participants
n=4 Participants
84 participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
183 Participants
n=5 Participants
180 Participants
n=7 Participants
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
184 Participants
n=4 Participants
732 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
106 Participants
n=7 Participants
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
116 Participants
n=4 Participants
453 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
297 Participants
n=5 Participants
281 Participants
n=7 Participants
296 Participants
n=5 Participants
294 Participants
n=4 Participants
1168 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of myocardial infarction
Yes
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=4 Participants
140 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of myocardial infarction
No
267 Participants
n=5 Participants
246 Participants
n=7 Participants
268 Participants
n=5 Participants
264 Participants
n=4 Participants
1045 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of stroke
Yes
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
70 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of stroke
No
287 Participants
n=5 Participants
268 Participants
n=7 Participants
276 Participants
n=5 Participants
284 Participants
n=4 Participants
1115 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of transient ischemic attack
Yes
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
68 Participants
n=21 Participants
History of transient ischemic attack
No
289 Participants
n=5 Participants
261 Participants
n=7 Participants
286 Participants
n=5 Participants
281 Participants
n=4 Participants
1117 Participants
n=21 Participants
Systolic blood pressure
134 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18 • n=5 Participants
135 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 • n=7 Participants
136 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 • n=5 Participants
135 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 • n=4 Participants
135 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18 • n=21 Participants
Diastolic blood pressure
75 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=5 Participants
75 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=7 Participants
76 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
75 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=4 Participants
75 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=21 Participants
Visual-acuity score and Snellen equivalent
68-82 letters, 20/25-40
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
94 Participants
n=7 Participants
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
103 Participants
n=4 Participants
424 Participants
n=21 Participants
Visual-acuity score and Snellen equivalent
53-67 letters, 20/50-80
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
118 Participants
n=7 Participants
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
119 Participants
n=4 Participants
443 Participants
n=21 Participants
Visual-acuity score and Snellen equivalent
38-52 letters, 20/100-160
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
58 Participants
n=4 Participants
236 Participants
n=21 Participants
Visual-acuity score and Snellen equivalent
23-37 letters, 20/200-320
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
82 Participants
n=21 Participants
Visual-acuity score and Snellen equivalent
60.1 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=5 Participants
60.2 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 • n=7 Participants
61.5 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=5 Participants
60.4 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=4 Participants
60.5 Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=21 Participants
Total thickness at fovea
458 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 184 • n=5 Participants
463 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 196 • n=7 Participants
458 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 193 • n=5 Participants
461 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 175 • n=4 Participants
460 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 187 • n=21 Participants
Retinal thickness plus subfoveal-fluid thickness at fovea
251 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 122 • n=5 Participants
254 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 121 • n=7 Participants
247 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 122 • n=5 Participants
252 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 115 • n=4 Participants
251 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 120 • n=21 Participants
Foveal center involvement
Choroidal neovacularization
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
153 Participants
n=7 Participants
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
183 Participants
n=4 Participants
688 Participants
n=21 Participants
Foveal center involvement
Fluid
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
81 Participants
n=7 Participants
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
72 Participants
n=4 Participants
315 Participants
n=21 Participants
Foveal center involvement
Hemorrhage
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
93 Participants
n=21 Participants
Foveal center involvement
Other
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
71 Participants
n=21 Participants
Foveal center involvement
No choroidal neovascularization or can't grade
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
18 Participants
n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Population: All patients who had VA measured at week 52 were included in the analysis. All analyses were performed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that data for all 23 patients at one center be excluded because of serious protocol noncompliance.

Visual acuity testing was performed with the Electronic Visual Tester (EVA) following the ETDRS protocol. VA score is measured as number of letters read correctly. The VA score change is the difference of the VA score at 1 Year and the VA score at baseline. In this study, the outcome VA score change is ranged from -71 to 52, with the higher VA score change the better visual acuity improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Change From Baseline in Visual-acuity Score (Continuous)
8.5 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 14.1
8.0 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 15.8
6.8 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 13.1
5.9 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 15.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Change From Baseline Visual-acuity Score (Frequency)
Increase of ≥15 letters
97 Participants
83 Participants
71 Participants
76 Participants
Change From Baseline Visual-acuity Score (Frequency)
Increase of 5-14 letters
90 Participants
98 Participants
103 Participants
90 Participants
Change From Baseline Visual-acuity Score (Frequency)
Change of ≤4 letters
62 Participants
50 Participants
75 Participants
59 Participants
Change From Baseline Visual-acuity Score (Frequency)
Decrease of 5-14 letters
19 Participants
18 Participants
23 Participants
23 Participants
Change From Baseline Visual-acuity Score (Frequency)
Decrease of ≥15 letters
16 Participants
16 Participants
13 Participants
23 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Frequency)
83-97 letters, 20/12-20
42 Participants
45 Participants
38 Participants
40 Participants
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Frequency)
68-82 letters, 20/25-40
149 Participants
134 Participants
141 Participants
127 Participants
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Frequency)
53-67 letters, 20/50-80
52 Participants
47 Participants
66 Participants
57 Participants
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Frequency)
38-52 letters, 20/100-160
23 Participants
21 Participants
23 Participants
24 Participants
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Frequency)
≤37 letters, ≤20/200
18 Participants
18 Participants
17 Participants
23 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Visual acuity testing was performed with the Electronic Visual Tester (EVA) following the ETDRS protocol. VA score is measured as number of letters read correctly. In this study, the outcome VA score is ranged from 0 to 97, with the higher score the better visual acuity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Visual-acuity Score and Snellen Equivalent (Continuous)
68.8 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 17.7
68.4 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 18.2
68.4 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 16.4
66.5 No. of Letters
Standard Deviation 19.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 Year

Cumulative over the 1 year of trial

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Number of Treatments
11.7 Number of Treatments
Standard Error 1.5
11.9 Number of Treatments
Standard Error 1.2
6.9 Number of Treatments
Standard Error 3.0
7.7 Number of Treatments
Standard Error 3.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Average Cost of Drug/Patient
23400 US dollars per patient
Standard Deviation 3000
595 US dollars per patient
Standard Deviation 60
13800 US dollars per patient
Standard Deviation 6000
385 US dollars per patient
Standard Deviation 175

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=280 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=261 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=281 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Total Thickness at Fovea
266 μm
Standard Deviation 125
300 μm
Standard Deviation 149
294 μm
Standard Deviation 139
308 μm
Standard Deviation 127

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=280 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=260 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=278 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Total Thickness Change From Baseline at Fovea
-196 μm
Standard Deviation 176
-164 μm
Standard Deviation 181
-168 μm
Standard Deviation 186
-152 μm
Standard Deviation 178

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=280 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=261 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=281 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Retinal Thickness Plus Subfoveal-fluid Thickness at Fovea
152 μm
Standard Deviation 57
172 μm
Standard Deviation 81
166 μm
Standard Deviation 66
172 μm
Standard Deviation 68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=280 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=260 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=278 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Retinal Thickness Plus Subfoveal-fluid Thickness Change From Baseline at Fovea
-100 μm
Standard Deviation 130
-79 μm
Standard Deviation 132
-81 μm
Standard Deviation 134
-79 μm
Standard Deviation 123

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Fluid on Optical Coherence Tomography
Absent
124 Participants
69 Participants
68 Participants
52 Participants
Fluid on Optical Coherence Tomography
Present
151 Participants
188 Participants
203 Participants
214 Participants
Fluid on Optical Coherence Tomography
Data missing
9 Participants
8 Participants
14 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=284 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=265 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=285 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=271 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Dye Leakage on Angiogram
Absent
167 Participants
153 Participants
133 Participants
111 Participants
Dye Leakage on Angiogram
Present
97 Participants
100 Participants
137 Participants
145 Participants
Dye Leakage on Angiogram
Data missing
20 Participants
12 Participants
15 Participants
15 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=256 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=243 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=265 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=249 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Area of Lesion
6.6 mm^2
Standard Deviation 6.8
6.5 mm^2
Standard Deviation 6.7
7.3 mm^2
Standard Deviation 6.5
7.0 mm^2
Standard Deviation 7.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=250 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=238 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=259 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=241 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Area of Lesion Change From Baseline
-0.1 mm^2
Standard Deviation 5.2
0.3 mm^2
Standard Deviation 4.9
0.6 mm^2
Standard Deviation 6.2
1.3 mm^2
Standard Deviation 6.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=239 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=226 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=250 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=232 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
-2.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 22.4
-5.4 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 18.2
-5.2 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 20.3
-4.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 20.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 Year

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=239 Participants
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=226 Participants
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=250 Participants
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=232 Participants
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
-0.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 11.9
-1.4 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 11.2
-1.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.2
-2.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.8

Adverse Events

1-Lucentis Monthly

Serious events: 53 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

2-Avastin Monthly

Serious events: 64 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

3-Lucentis as Needed

Serious events: 61 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

4-Avastin as Needed

Serious events: 77 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=301 participants at risk
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=286 participants at risk
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=298 participants at risk
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=300 participants at risk
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
General disorders
Any other system organ class
6.0%
18/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
9.1%
26/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
5.4%
16/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
9.3%
28/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benignor malignant neoplasm
2.3%
7/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.7%
5/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.4%
10/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.0%
9/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
3.3%
10/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
5.6%
16/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
4.0%
12/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
4.3%
13/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
General disorders
Death from any cause
1.3%
4/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.4%
4/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.7%
5/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.7%
11/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Death from vascular causes
0.66%
2/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.70%
2/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.67%
2/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.7%
5/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
1.00%
3/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
2.1%
6/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.67%
2/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.0%
9/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.70%
2/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Infection
2.0%
6/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.8%
11/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
4.0%
12/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
6.0%
18/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury or procedural complication
2.3%
7/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.8%
11/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
2.7%
8/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.0%
9/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
2.0%
6/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.1%
9/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
4.0%
12/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
3.0%
9/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Nonfatal myocardial infarction
0.66%
2/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.70%
2/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.0%
3/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.33%
1/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Nonfatal stroke
1.00%
3/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.70%
2/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.34%
1/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.67%
2/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical or medical procedure
1.3%
4/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
2.1%
6/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.3%
4/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
2.7%
8/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Transient ischemic attack
0.33%
1/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.67%
2/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.0%
3/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Venous thrombotic event
0.00%
0/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.4%
4/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.67%
2/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.33%
1/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
1-Lucentis Monthly
n=301 participants at risk
Lucentis® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Lucentis® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
2-Avastin Monthly
n=286 participants at risk
Avastin® on a fixed schedule of every 4 weeks for 1 year; at 1 year, re-randomization to Avastin® every 4 weeks or to variable dosing.
3-Lucentis as Needed
n=298 participants at risk
Lucentis® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
4-Avastin as Needed
n=300 participants at risk
Avastin® on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; i.e., after initial treatment, monthly evaluation for treatment based on signs of lesion activity.
Eye disorders
Endophthalmitis
0.66%
2/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
1.4%
4/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
Eye disorders
Pseudoendophthalmitis
0.33%
1/301 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/286 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/298 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/300 • Adverse events were collected at 1 year.
Adverse events were ascertained through monthly questioning of patients by study coordinators who were aware of study-group assignments; events were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system, version 10. A medical monitor who was unaware of study-group assignments reviewed serious adverse events.

Additional Information

Dr. Maureen Maguire

CATT Research Group

Phone: 215-615-1501

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Dr. Grunwald reports receiving consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline; and Dr. Jaffe, consulting fees from Neurotech and SurModics. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER