Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
13 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-12-31
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Studies have shown that making the diagnosis of BE can be hard to make. One of the reasons why this may be is because doctors may interpret what they see differently during the procedure. In other words, they may see an esophagus that appears normal in color or abnormal in color.
The purpose of this study is to compare two doctors' impressions of the appearance of the esophagus during a single endoscopy procedure.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Study participants must be older than 18 years of age who are having an endoscopy performed to evaluate symptoms of GERD such as heartburn, acid taste in the mouth, dysphagia, dyspepsia, or those who are having a screening/surveillance exam for BE.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Upper GI symptoms such as acid taste in mouth, dysphagia, dyspepsia
* Screening or surveillance exam for BE
Exclusion Criteria
* History of esophageal varices
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Glenn M Eisen, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OHSU
Portland, Oregon, United States
PVAMC
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eloubeidi MA, Provenzale D. Does this patient have Barrett's esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett's esophagus at the index endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.990_m.x.
Padda S, Ramirez FC. Accuracy in the diagnosis of short-segment Barrett's esophagus: the role of endoscopic experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):605-8. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118714.
Kim SL, Waring JP, Spechler SJ, Sampliner RE, Doos WG, Krol WF, Williford WO. Diagnostic inconsistencies in Barrett's esophagus. Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Study Group. Gastroenterology. 1994 Oct;107(4):945-9.
Meining A, Ott R, Becker I, Hahn S, Muhlen J, Werner M, Hofler H, Classen M, Heldwein W, Rosch T. The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance? Gut. 2004 Oct;53(10):1402-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.036822.
Guda NM, Partington S, Vakil N. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the measurement of length at endoscopy: Implications for the measurement of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 May;59(6):655-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00182-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00003558
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id