Study of Endoscopic Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT00591461

Last Updated: 2019-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a condition that often occurs in patients who have had GERD for a long time. The researchers are interested in BE because it can sometimes become a cancer in the esophagus. The way that we currently diagnose BE is by performing an upper endoscopy and looking for a change in the color of the esophagus. This color change may represent BE. If the doctor sees this, he/she may take biopsies of this area.

Studies have shown that making the diagnosis of BE can be hard to make. One of the reasons why this may be is because doctors may interpret what they see differently during the procedure. In other words, they may see an esophagus that appears normal in color or abnormal in color.

The purpose of this study is to compare two doctors' impressions of the appearance of the esophagus during a single endoscopy procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Barrett's Esophagus GERD

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Barrett's Esophagus Upper Endoscopy Esophageal biopsies Accuracy Interobserver Agreement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Study participants must be older than 18 years of age who are having an endoscopy performed to evaluate symptoms of GERD such as heartburn, acid taste in the mouth, dysphagia, dyspepsia, or those who are having a screening/surveillance exam for BE.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* History of (h/o) GERD
* Upper GI symptoms such as acid taste in mouth, dysphagia, dyspepsia
* Screening or surveillance exam for BE

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to consent
* History of esophageal varices
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Glenn M Eisen, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OHSU

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

PVAMC

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eloubeidi MA, Provenzale D. Does this patient have Barrett's esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett's esophagus at the index endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.990_m.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10201460 (View on PubMed)

Padda S, Ramirez FC. Accuracy in the diagnosis of short-segment Barrett's esophagus: the role of endoscopic experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):605-8. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118714.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11677477 (View on PubMed)

Kim SL, Waring JP, Spechler SJ, Sampliner RE, Doos WG, Krol WF, Williford WO. Diagnostic inconsistencies in Barrett's esophagus. Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Study Group. Gastroenterology. 1994 Oct;107(4):945-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7926484 (View on PubMed)

Meining A, Ott R, Becker I, Hahn S, Muhlen J, Werner M, Hofler H, Classen M, Heldwein W, Rosch T. The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance? Gut. 2004 Oct;53(10):1402-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.036822.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15361485 (View on PubMed)

Guda NM, Partington S, Vakil N. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the measurement of length at endoscopy: Implications for the measurement of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 May;59(6):655-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00182-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15114308 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00003558

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id