Trial Outcomes & Findings for Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure (NCT NCT00588692)
NCT ID: NCT00588692
Last Updated: 2014-05-06
Results Overview
Peak oxygen uptake (VO2) is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption as measured during incremental exercise, most typically on a motorized treadmill. Maximal oxygen consumption reflects the aerobic physical fitness of the individual. VO2 data was obtained via standard breath-by-breath expired gas analysis. Ejection Fraction Subgroups are based on participants reported at baseline.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
baseline, 6 months
2014-05-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize heart failure (HF) treatment.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-lide device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-lide device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
23
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize heart failure (HF) treatment.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-lide device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-lide device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Hip Surgery
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Severe Peptic Ulcer Disease
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Cancer
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
|
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=5 Participants
|
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=7 Participants
|
29.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
History of Hypertension
Prior Hypertension
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of Hypertension
No Prior Hypertension
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
Prior History of Diabetes
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
No History of Diabetes
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Obesity
Obese at Baseline
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Obesity
Not Obese at Baseline
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: For the EF subgroup 25-49%, n=48, 24 SphygmoCor Unblinded, 24 SphygmoCor Blinded. For the EF subgroup 35-49%, n=33, 14 SphygmoCor Unblinded,. 19 SphygmoCor Blinded. 2 subjects had EF either \<25 or \>50, and they were not included in the analysis.
Peak oxygen uptake (VO2) is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption as measured during incremental exercise, most typically on a motorized treadmill. Maximal oxygen consumption reflects the aerobic physical fitness of the individual. VO2 data was obtained via standard breath-by-breath expired gas analysis. Ejection Fraction Subgroups are based on participants reported at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
Ejection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%, n=48
|
1.5 percentage of change in Peak VO2
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
-0.5 percentage of change in Peak VO2
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
Ejection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%, n=33
|
2.0 percentage of change in Peak VO2
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
-1.0 percentage of change in Peak VO2
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsAortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
Ejection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%
|
-6.9 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
-4.9 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
|
Change in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
Ejection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%
|
-8.3 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
-5.5 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, six monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Heart Rate
|
3 bpm
Standard Deviation 7
|
-1 bpm
Standard Deviation 10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsEnd-diastolic volume (EDV) is the volume of blood in the right and/or left ventricle at end load or filling in (diastole). An increase in EDV increases the preload on the heart and, through the Frank-Starling mechanism of the heart, increases the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle during systole (stroke volume). Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV EDV was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with ejection fraction (EF).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volume
|
-24 ml
Standard Deviation 30
|
-17 ml
Standard Deviation 32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsEnd-systolic volume (ESV) is the volume of blood in a ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. ESV is the lowest volume of blood in the ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle. End systolic volume can be used clinically as a measurement of the adequacy of cardiac emptying, related to systolic function. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV end systolic volumes was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with EF.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in LV End Systolic Volume
|
-18 ml
Standard Deviation 18
|
-11 ml
Standard Deviation 20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsThe ejection fraction is the percentage of the volume in the left ventricle ejected during a cardiac cycle. The normal ejection fraction is 55 to 75 percent. EF = (EDV - ESV) / EDV where EF = ejection fraction, EDV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-diastole, ESV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-systole. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in LV Ejection Fraction
|
2 percentage of LV blood volume
Standard Deviation 2
|
-0.0 percentage of LV blood volume
Standard Deviation 2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsStroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood pumped from one ventricle of the heart with each beat. SV was determined from pulse wave (PW) and continuous wave (CW) Doppler in the LV outflow tract.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Stroke Volume
|
10 ml
Standard Deviation 21
|
10 ml
Standard Deviation 21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsThe Mitral E velocity is the speed at which blood fills the ventricle. It is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mitral E Velocity
|
5 cm/sec
Standard Deviation 15
|
4 cm/sec
Standard Deviation 12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsThe E/A ratio is a marker of the function of the left ventricle of the heart; it is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality. Abnormalities in the E/A ratio on Doppler echocardiography suggest that the left ventricle, which pumps blood into the circulation, cannot fill with blood properly in the period between contractions. The E/A ratio is the ratio of peak early transmitral inflow velocity and peak late mitral inflow velocity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mitral E/A Ratio
|
-0.1 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
-0.1 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsThe deceleration time (DT) is the time taken from the maximum E point to baseline. Normally in adults it is less than 220 milliseconds. The DT was measured by pulse wave doppler.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Time
|
-25 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Deviation 58
|
-5 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Deviation 43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsBlood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial systolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
|
-9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17
|
-9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsBlood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial diastolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Brachial Diastolic BP
|
-2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8
|
-4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsCentral blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Systolic BP
|
-8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19
|
-9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsCentral blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Diastolic BP
|
-7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10
|
-3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsAortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Augmentation Index
|
-7 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 9
|
-5 percentage of change in AIx
Standard Deviation 6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsElastance is a measure of the tendency of a hollow organ to recoil toward its original dimensions upon removal of a distending or compressing force. Effective arterial elastance was determined by the ratio of end systolic BP/stroke volume (SV).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SphygmoCor Unblinded
n=23 Participants
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
|
SphygmoCor Blinded
n=27 Participants
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Arterial Elastance
|
-0.3 mmHg/ml
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
-0.3 mmHg/ml
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
Adverse Events
Treatment
Control
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment
n=24 participants at risk
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
Control
n=27 participants at risk
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Death
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure Hospitalization
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
7.4%
2/27 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment
n=24 participants at risk
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
Control
n=27 participants at risk
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
SphygmoCor: The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
33.3%
8/24 • Number of events 8 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
18.5%
5/27 • Number of events 5 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Worsening Renal Function
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Participants were followed for safety reporting at monthly visits over the 6-month study period.
The adverse event subject population did not include the six subject who were loss to follow up, and the three subjects who withdrew because of noncardiac medical conditions that developed during the study period. Therefore adverse events are reported on 27 subjects in the control arm, and 24 subjects in the treatment arm.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place