Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
156 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2009-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in ACS Patients
NCT03329612
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
NCT01158716
Long-term Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Improve the Prognosis of Myocardial Infarction Patients With Emergency Reperfusion Therapy
NCT03018873
Ischemic Conditioning in STEMI Patients
NCT03097419
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT07272408
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: To evaluate whether remote ischemic preconditioning reduces the frequency of myonecrosis (troponin T≥0.03 ng/ml following PCI).
Aim 2: To evaluate whether remote ischemic preconditioning reduces the inflammatory response to PCI (post PCI hsCRP level).
Aim 3: To evaluate whether pre-procedure circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts correlate with the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on myonecrosis.
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) frequently results in ischemic myonecrosis. Ischemic preconditioning (IP) has been shown in animal studies to increase the myocardial tolerance to subsequent ischemia. Our primary hypothesis is that remote IP reduces myocardial ischemic injury during PCI.
Aims: The aims of the study are to assess in patients with coronary artery disease requiring PCI, whether remote IP reduces: 1) the frequency of myonecrosis; and 2) the inflammatory response to PCI; and 3) whether the effect of IP correlates with pre-procedure circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts.
Methods: The study is a prospective, randomized trial to assess the efficacy of remote IP as adjunctive non-pharmacological therapy for PCI in patients with stable or unstable angina. Remote IP will be performed by 3 cycles of 3-minutes of arm ischemia alternating with 3- minutes of reperfusion of the arm immediately before PCI. Myonecrosis and inflammation will be detected by measuring serum troponin T and high sensitivity C-reactive protein, respectively. Blood EPC counts will also be measured before the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Arm ischemia will be induced using a blood pressure cuff that will be placed around the upper part of the arm, and inflated to 200 mm Hg for 3-minutes and then deflated for 3-minutes
Blood pressure cuff
Arm ischemia will be induced using a blood pressure cuff that will be placed around the upper part of the arm, and inflated to 200 mm Hg for 3-minutes and then deflated for 3-minutes
2
3-cycles of cuff inflation (10 mmHg)-deflation will also be performed in the control group for similar durations without inducing ischemia
blood pressure cuff
3-cycles of cuff inflation (10 mmHg)-deflation will also be performed in the control group for similar durations without inducing ischemia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood pressure cuff
Arm ischemia will be induced using a blood pressure cuff that will be placed around the upper part of the arm, and inflated to 200 mm Hg for 3-minutes and then deflated for 3-minutes
blood pressure cuff
3-cycles of cuff inflation (10 mmHg)-deflation will also be performed in the control group for similar durations without inducing ischemia
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Clinically indicated elective or urgent PCI
Exclusion Criteria
1. Pre-PCI Troponin T ≥ 0.03
2. Systemic hypotension (systolic \<90 mmHg) or cardiogenic shock
3. Presence of an arteriovenous fistula or lymphedema of either arm
4. Currently enrolled in other active cardiovascular investigational studies
5. Severe endocrine, hepatic, renal, disorders
6. Pregnancy or lactation
7. Inability to provide consent
8. Federal Medical Center inmates
9. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abhiram Prasad
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abhiram Prasad, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Prasad A, Gossl M, Hoyt J, Lennon RJ, Polk L, Simari R, Holmes DR Jr, Rihal CS, Lerman A. Remote ischemic preconditioning immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention does not impact myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts: a single center randomized sham controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;81(6):930-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24443. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-005081
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.