MRI and Ultrasound Findings in Patients With Gout and Normal Plain Radiographs
NCT ID: NCT00584311
Last Updated: 2008-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-06-30
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is vast emerging data to suggest that MRI and US are much more sensitive than plain radiographs at detecting the early stigmata of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Indeed, these imaging devices have revolutionized the treatment of RA, for the earlier detection of the skeletal changes of RA often mandates more aggressive therapy. These same changes would often be missed by plain radiographs.
It is our hypothesis that MR imaging and US will detect the skeletal changes that are typical of gout much sooner than would plain radiography. We also hypothesize that these same imaging techniques will be able to detect signs of hyperuricemic silent deposition in asymptomatic joints of patients with symptomatic gout in other joints. As was the case with RA, the expected results of this study would mandate more aggressive therapy of both gout and hyperuricemia.
Our primary aim of this proposal would be accomplished by studying patients with known gout and normal plain radiographs. Each patient would have their most frequently involved joint (index joint) analyzed by MRI and US to evaluate for any destructive changes (erosions or tophi with cortical damage). Any signs that may portend future joint destruction such as synovial pannus, bone marrow edema, soft tissue edema, or joint effusions will also be documented. In order to demonstrate the effects of hyperuricemic silent deposition, an asymptomatic joint from these same patients will be studied using these same imaging techniques. Any evidence of erosions, tophi, synovial pannus, bone marrow or soft tissue edema, or joint effusions will be recorded. By demonstrating destructive, or potentially destructive, skeletal changes in the index joint or asymptomatic joint of a significant number of patients, we will show that patients who are left untreated on the basis of normal plain radiographs are likely to already have skeletal damage.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
All patients (with no structural damage on the plain x-ray) will receive a MRI and Ultrasound (US) of their most involved joint and an asymptomatic joint.
MRI and Ultrasound
MRI and US of the joint
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI and Ultrasound
MRI and US of the joint
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of another crystal induced arthritis (ex. pseudogout)
* Any contraindication to receiving an MRI (ex. pacemaker)
* Allergy to gadolinium contrast dye
* Inability to give informed consent
* Pregnant women
* Erosive changes on initial screening x-ray of index joint
* Serum Creatinine \> 1.8 mg/dL at screening visit
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of South Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of South Florida
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John D. Carter, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of South Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6123-G62368
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
6123-G62368
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id