Phenytoin and Driving Safety: A Randomized, Controlled Cross-Over Study

NCT ID: NCT00581893

Last Updated: 2021-07-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Automobile driving is a crucial aspect of everyday life, yet vehicular crashes represent a serious public health problem. Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking. The broad goal of our project is to determine the specific effects of the most commonly utilized AED, phenytoin, by assessing driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Our proposed experiments will assess: (1) cognitive functions using standardized neuropsychological tests (of attention, perception, memory, and executive functions), (2) driving performance during phenytoin and placebo administration, and (3) the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive performance upon driving performance. To measure driving performance, we will use a state-of-the-art fixed-base interactive driving simulator that allows us to observe driver errors in an environment that is challenging yet safe for the driver and tester, under conditions of optimal stimulus and response control. The results of this study of 30 drivers treated with phenytoin and placebo will increase the understanding of the role of AED-related cognitive impairment on driving safety errors. A better understanding of the impact of AEDs upon driving performance is necessary to rationally develop interventions that could help prevent crashes by drivers treated with AEDs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking.

The broad goal of the current project is to determine the specific effects of AEDs on cognitive function and driving performance. To address this goal we will assess driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin (Dilantin), the most commonly prescribed AED. Effects of phenytoin on driving performance and cognition will be addressed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Driver cognition will be assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Driving performance will be objectively assessed in all participants on standardized tasks enacted in a state-of-the-art driving simulator. Our 3 Specific Aims are:

Aim 1: To assess the effects of phenytoin on cognitive abilities that are crucial to the driving task, including perception, attention, memory, and executive function.

Hypothesis 1: A driver's cognitive abilities will decline during steady-state phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater decline.

Aim 2: To assess effects of phenytoin on driving performance and safety errors in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.

Hypothesis 2: Driving performance will decline and driver safety errors will increase during phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater impairments of driving.

Aim 3: To assess the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive impairments upon driving performance in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.

Hypothesis 3. Impairments of cognitive function affecting perception, attention, memory, executive function, and arousal will increase the likelihood of driver errors that may lead to a crash.

Our hypotheses would be supported if the drivers taking phenytoin, as opposed to placebo, demonstrate worse cognitive performance on neuropsychological tests, and more safety errors and crashes in the simulator. The hypotheses would also be supported if drivers with higher phenytoin levels show greater impairments of cognition and driving. Once the effects of phenytoin on driving performance are demonstrated in this project, we will have evidence to support more comprehensive research addressing specific dosing and serum levels and acute versus chronic administration.

There is currently no evidence concerning the effects of phenytoin on driving performance. Accurate driving performance data on patients receiving phenytoin would allow determination of fair and accurate criteria for making recommendations to drive or not to drive affecting millions of patients taking AEDS for epilepsy and other conditions. These data could also help reduce the risk of car crashes due to medication side effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Measures Driving Simulator Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Phenytoin administration

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Phenytoin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phenytoin will be dosed to a target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month

2

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo oral capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Phenytoin

Phenytoin will be dosed to a target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo oral capsule

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dilantin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Anticipating a 10-15% drop-out rate, we will induct 30 neurologically normal subjects (age 18 (21) -60) to obtain 25 evaluable subjects who are legally licensed to drive in their state of residence and have been actively driving under appropriate legal guidelines for at least 5 years (to minimize performance variations of novice drivers).
* Because this study is intended to determine the potential effects of phenytoin on driving performance, a relatively healthy cohort of patients must be chosen. Chronic medical or psychiatric conditions could cause significant alterations in driving performance independent of those caused by phenytoin, which would complicate interpretation of performance impairments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who are younger than 18 or older than 60
* Have history of prior seizures, family history of epilepsy, or prior history of head injury
* Have a known history of prior drug or alcohol abuse or unwillingness to abstain from drug or alcohol use during the study period
* Have a past or current active neurological or psychiatric disorder that could impair cognitive or driving performance (i.e. baseline IQ \< 90, dementia, mental retardation, stroke, severe head injury, schizophrenia, active clinical depression, progressive brain tumor).
* Subjects who have a chronic medical condition (i.e. diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, hepatic dysfunction, hematologic condition, HIV)
* Taking medications known to affect the central nervous system (i.e. baseline pre-study treatment with antiepileptic drug, anxiolytics, sedatives, hypnotics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, narcotics and tranquilizers)
* Regularly use over-the-counter cough suppressants, antihistamines, or sleep aids; or who ingest over 7 cups of daily coffee or currently smoke cigarettes.
* Subjects will be excluded if they cannot complete SIREN testing or neuropsychological instruments because of visual or hearing impairment (history or screening discovery of corrected visual acuity of less than 20/50) or other physical disability, or if they have a history of severe motion sickness as an adult-a marker for patients who develop simulator sickness and therefore cannot participate in SIREN testing.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erik St. Louis

Assistant Professor (Clinical)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik K St. Louis, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

St. Louis EK, McEvoy S, Shi QC, Rizzo M. Useful Field of View impairment in partial epilepsy. Unpublished observations and submitted abstract to 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driving Asssessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Rockport, Maine, June, 2005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R49CE721682-05

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

200512712

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.