Trial Outcomes & Findings for Circadian Rhythms of Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Humans (NCT NCT00572936)
NCT ID: NCT00572936
Last Updated: 2023-10-24
Results Overview
Intra-ocular Pressure was measured by applanation tonometry
COMPLETED
PHASE2
30 participants
2 weeks
2023-10-24
Participant Flow
One patient who was taking latanoprost for ocular hypertension did not have an IOP rise greater than 20mmHg after discontinuing treatment for up to 12 weeks. A second patient who initially expressed interest chose to withdraw from the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Latanoprost/Dorzolamide/Timolol
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
Latanoprost/Timolol/Dorzolamide
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
Dorzolamide/Latanoprost/Timolol
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
Dorzolamide/Timolol/Latanoprost
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
Timolol/Dorzolamide/Latanoprost
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
Timolol/Latanoprost/Dorzolamide
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention
STARTED
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
|
Third Intervention
COMPLETED
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
|
Third Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Circadian Rhythms of Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Humans
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Latanoprost/Dorzolamide/Timolol
n=30 Participants
The participants received latanoprost at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Dorzolamide BID for two weeks, then 6 week washout, then Timolol BID for two weeks. The order in which the participants received the three different drugs was random.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksIntra-ocular Pressure was measured by applanation tonometry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Intraocular Pressure
Daytime
|
17.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
16.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
20.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
|
Intraocular Pressure
Night time
|
17.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
17.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
17.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksaqueous flow measurements was calculated using fluorophotometry measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Aqueous Flow
day time
|
2.09 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
1.57 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
1.75 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
|
Aqueous Flow
night time
|
1.1 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
1.1 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
1.1 μL/min
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weekscentral corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Corneal Thickness
day time
|
564 μm
Standard Deviation 40
|
568 μm
Standard Deviation 43
|
564 μm
Standard Deviation 44
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness
night time
|
585 μm
Standard Deviation 46
|
586 μm
Standard Deviation 45
|
582 μm
Standard Deviation 43
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksAnterior chamber volume was measured by A-scan ultrasound biometry, daytime
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Anterior Chamber Volume
|
191 μL
Standard Deviation 45
|
191 μL
Standard Deviation 33
|
198 μL
Standard Deviation 38
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksblood pressure was measured by sphygmomanometry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure
systolic day time
|
136 mmHg
Standard Deviation 20
|
138 mmHg
Standard Deviation 22
|
139 mmHg
Standard Deviation 19
|
|
Blood Pressure
systolic night time
|
143 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17
|
136 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15
|
138 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17
|
|
Blood Pressure
diastolic day time
|
78 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
|
81 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
|
83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
|
|
Blood Pressure
diastolic night time
|
83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
|
79 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11
|
82 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksEpiscleral venous pressure was measured by venomenometry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Episcleral Venous Pressure
|
9.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
9.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
9.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksoutflow facility was calculated using fluorophotometry and tonography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Outflow Facility
day time fluorophotometry
|
0.23 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.23 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.21 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Outflow Facility
daytime tonography
|
0.22 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.18 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.20 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
|
Outflow Facility
night tonography
|
0.21 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.17 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.18 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksuvescleral outflow was calulated using goldmann equation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Latanoprost
n=28 Participants
The participants received latanoprost 0.004% at night and vehicle in the morning for two weeks
|
Timolol
n=24 Participants
The participants received timolol 0.5% BID for two weeks
|
Dorzolamide
n=26 Participants
The participants received dorzolamide 2% BID for two weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Uvescleral Outflow
day time fluorophotometry
|
0.43 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
-0.16 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
0.14 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
|
Uvescleral Outflow
daytime tonography
|
0.90 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
0.70 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
0.58 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
|
Uvescleral Outflow
night tonography
|
0.26 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
0.50 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
0.12 µL/min per mm Hg
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
Adverse Events
Latanoprost
Dorzolamide
Timolol
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place