Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Oral Premalignant Lesions With 5-ALA PDT (NCT NCT00571974)
NCT ID: NCT00571974
Last Updated: 2015-03-24
Results Overview
The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
29 participants
Day 2
2015-03-24
Participant Flow
Subjects were identified in the head and neck oncology clinic and enrolled into the study within the time period of January 1, 2007 to November 18, 2009.
Screen failure did meet incl./excl. criteria
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phase I
To determine the maximum tolerated energy density of the Pulse Dye Laser operated at 585 nm with a pulse time of 1.5 ms (PDL-585), when used in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) applied topically to the premalignant lesion.
The maximum tolerated energy density will be called the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
|
Phase II
During Phase II, to assess the treatment efficacy of PDL-585 when used at the MTD in combination with 5-ALA applied topically to the premalignant lesion. Treatment efficacy will be assessed by means of the 90-day Objective Response rate observed among study subjects treated at the MTD.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Phase I
STARTED
|
9
|
0
|
|
Phase I
COMPLETED
|
9
|
0
|
|
Phase I
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase II
STARTED
|
0
|
21
|
|
Phase II
COMPLETED
|
0
|
17
|
|
Phase II
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Treatment of Oral Premalignant Lesions With 5-ALA PDT
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase I
n=11 Participants
To determine the maximum tolerated energy density of the Pulse Dye Laser operated at 585 nm with a pulse time of 1.5 ms (PDL-585), when used in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) applied topically to the premalignant lesion.
The maximum tolerated energy density will be called the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
|
Phase II
n=18 Participants
During Phase II, to assess the treatment efficacy of PDL-585 when used at the MTD in combination with 5-ALA applied topically to the premalignant lesion. Treatment efficacy will be assessed by means of the 90-day Objective Response rate observed among study subjects treated at the MTD.
|
Total
n=29 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<=18 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 80 years
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=80 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 2Population: Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures (laser doses) of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. The highest radiant light dose attained that did not produce more than 2 DLTs was declared to be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).
The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=9 Participants
Participants in the Phase I part of the study.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Tolerated Dose
|
8 J/cm2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 90Population: The Simon two-stage minimax design with 9 subjects in the first stage and 8 subjects in the second stage, yielding 17 subjects overall.
The response rate was quantified by examination by an experienced head and neck surgeon and classified as follows: significant response (SR) was one where the lesion had greater than 75% resolution, partial response (PR) was one in which the lesion was reduced in size by at least 25%, and no response (NR) was one where the lesion was reduced by less than 25% in size.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=17 Participants
Participants in the Phase I part of the study.
|
|---|---|
|
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
Participants with Significant Response (SR)
|
7 participants
|
|
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
Participants with Partial Response (PR)
|
9 participants
|
|
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
Participants with no Response (NR)
|
1 participants
|
Adverse Events
Phase I
Phase II
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase I
n=9 participants at risk
To determine the maximum tolerated energy density of the Pulse Dye Laser operated at 585 nm with a pulse time of 1.5 ms (PDL-585), when used in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) applied topically to the premalignant lesion.
The maximum tolerated energy density will be called the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
|
Phase II
n=21 participants at risk
During Phase II, to assess the treatment efficacy of PDL-585 when used at the MTD in combination with 5-ALA applied topically to the premalignant lesion. Treatment efficacy will be assessed by means of the 90-day Objective Response rate observed among study subjects treated at the MTD.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pain
|
22.2%
2/9 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Dry mouth
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Bad breath
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Insomnia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Swollen lip
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Redness on chin
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Taste altered
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Burning sensation
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Sensitive to cold
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Sensitive
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Raw
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Soreness
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
|
General disorders
Swelling
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
0.00%
0/21 • 1 year
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place