A Randomised Study Comparing Tissue Conservation in Conventional Versus Mohs' Surgery of Basal Cell Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT00571363
Last Updated: 2007-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-31
2006-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard surgery
basal cell carcinomas were excised with 4 mm margins
standard surgery
excision with 4 mm margins
Mohs
Basal cell carcinoma were removed via Mohs Micrographic surgery
Mohs micrographic surgery
excision of basal cell carcinoma with 2 mm margins and immediate examination of margins for residual tumour. residual tumour was excised until complete tumour removal was achieved.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
standard surgery
excision with 4 mm margins
Mohs micrographic surgery
excision of basal cell carcinoma with 2 mm margins and immediate examination of margins for residual tumour. residual tumour was excised until complete tumour removal was achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects unable to comply with instructions,
* Immunosuppressed subjects
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Tayside
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
NHS Tayside,
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank M Muller
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Tayside
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
Dundee, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Muller FM, Dawe RS, Moseley H, Fleming CJ. Randomized comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and surgical excision for small nodular basal cell carcinoma: tissue-sparing outcome. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1349-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01240.x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R&D Project ID: 2003DS10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2003DS10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id