Airway Management in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomies

NCT ID: NCT00570414

Last Updated: 2009-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Secure airway management is the basis of all anesthesiological practice. Of particular importance is the securing of patients' airway passages when the surgical procedure itself poses a threat to a patient's airway, as is the case in all procedures involving the upper respiratory pathways. When adenoidectomies, tonsillectomies and combined adenotonsillectomies are performed, blood from the surgical area will present a respiratory threat to unsecured airways. The traditional opinion has been that endotracheal intubation is the safest method of preventing aspiration.

The laryngeal mask was introduced in 1983 as an alternative to the endotracheal tube. In 1990, the flexible, reinforced laryngeal mask airway was introduced, intended for use during surgical procedures involving the mouth and throat. The laryngeal mask airway has several potential advantages over the endotracheal tube. It is inserted blindly, without laryngoscopy. This leads to reduced oropharyngeal or laryngeal stimulation and injury, and therefore minimal activation of respiratory and circulatory reflexes. The laryngeal mask airway can be placed without the use of muscle relaxants, avoiding potential side effects such as apnea, hyperkalemia and anaphylaxis. In addition the laryngeal mask airway can remain in the throat until the patient awakes, virtually eliminating the danger of postoperative aspiration.

Several international studies have described the advantages of the laryngeal mask airway over endotracheal intubation during ear, nose and throat surgery in children. The general impression is that there is a widespread routine implementation of the laryngeal mask airway. In Norway, however, this practice has been limited. As far as we know, only Namsos Hospital uses this procedure as its first choice. At Telemark Hospital we tested the use of laryngeal mask airway on 150 patients between May and December 2006. The results so far have been promising, and we have had no serious complications.

Hypothesis:

In children undergoing adenotonsillectomies, a laryngeal mask airway provides greater patient satisfaction (judged by reduced pain, nausea and vomiting) and greater effectivity (judged by reduced time in surgery), compared with the endotracheal tube. The laryngeal mask provides as much as or greater secure airway management measured by desaturations/Sp02\<92% and/or use of suxamethonium and bronchiolytic drugs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Registration:

Preoperative: Age, height, weight, medication, asthma/allergy, possible current respiratory infection

Peroperative: Type of procedure, tube size/laryngeal mask, type of tongue blade, highest/lowest SpO2, highest/lowest ET CO2, highest/lowest pulse, length of surgery, total operating room time, operator, medication. Reason must be given if converting from laryngeal mask to tube; lack of visibility for operator, laryngeal mask not possible to place, unacceptable leakage before placing tongue blade, occlusion after placement of tongue blade.

Postoperative: Pain judged by need for opiates (VAS, crying, agitation, tachycardia), nausea judged by gagging/vomiting, total time in recovery, rebleeding judged by reoperation.

Anesthesia:

Induction: Alfentanil 20 microg/kg body weight Propofol 3-4 mg/kg body weight Or: Sevoflurane/N2O mask induction with MAC 1-2

Maintenance: Alfentanil 5-10 microg/kg body weight every 8-10 minutes Sevoflurane/N2O equivalent to 1-1.5 MAC Acetaminophen supp 40 mg/kg body weight, max 2 g. Dexamethasone 0.15mg/kg body weight Xylocaine 1mg/kg body weight

Emergence: Morphine 100-200 mikrog/kg body weight

Postoperative: Morphine 50-100 microg/kg body weight

Post-discharge: Acetaminophen tbl 15 mg/kg body weight x 3 Or: Acetaminophen supp 20 mg/kg body weight x 3

Patient booklet:

A patient booklet will be produced for each patient. The booklet will contain only the patient's initials, age and research number. After the booklets are filled out, they will be stored in a locked facility by one of the examining physicians, and the code to the patient's name will be stored and locked separately by one of the researchers. The code will be destroyed at the end of the research study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tonsillitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laryngeal mask airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Airway management by the use of the flexible, reinforced laryngeal mask airway

2

Endotracheal tube (ETT)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Airway management by the use of endotracheal tube

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laryngeal mask airway

Airway management by the use of the flexible, reinforced laryngeal mask airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endotracheal tube

Airway management by the use of endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children 10-60 kg
* Elective adenotomy, tonsillectomy or combined adenotonsillectomy under general anesthesia.
* Written and oral informed parental consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA III or higher.
* Weight \< 10 kg or weight \> 60 kg.
* Congenital malformations of the mouth or throat.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sykehuset Telemark

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sykehuset Telemark

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simen Doksrød, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sykehuset Telemark

Peter Heidt, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Namsos Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sykehuset Telemark, Clinic of emergency medicin

Porsgrunn, Telemark, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

s-07031b

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

s8197.03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.