Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dynamic Hyperinflation and Tiotropium (NCT NCT00569270)
NCT ID: NCT00569270
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Results Overview
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second
COMPLETED
PHASE4
30 participants
30 days
2019-08-20
Participant Flow
Patients with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease)Stage 2 were recruited from pulmonary out-patient offices at Mt. Sinai Hosp. Toronto and from Arthur F Gelb MD Lakewood, Calif from June 2009 thru January 2010
We recruited 30 patients with smoking history \>20 pack yr with documented GOLD Stage 2 moderate COPD who were clinically stable for at least 6 weeks prior to the present study and were not on oxygen or oral corticosteroids.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tiotropium 18 µg Capsule First, Then Placebo
tiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo
|
Placebo First, Then Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg
tiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period: First Intervention
STARTED
|
15
|
15
|
|
Period: First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
15
|
14
|
|
Period: First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period: Second Intervention
STARTED
|
15
|
14
|
|
Period: Second Intervention
29 Days
|
15
|
14
|
|
Period: Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
15
|
14
|
|
Period: Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tiotropium 18 µg Capsule First, Then Placebo
tiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo
|
Placebo First, Then Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg
tiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period: First Intervention
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Dynamic Hyperinflation and Tiotropium
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Entire Study Population
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Average participant age +/- SD
|
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FVC (forced vital capacity)
FVC (L)
|
2.9 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FVC (forced vital capacity)
FVC (L) post 180 µg albuterol sulfate MDI
|
3.3 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FVC
FVC percent of liters predicted
|
86 percentage of liters expected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FVC
FVC post 180 µg albuterol percent of ltrs predict
|
95 percentage of liters expected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FEV1(L) (forces expiratory volume) observed
FEV1(L)
|
1.6 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FEV1(L) (forces expiratory volume) observed
FEV1(L) post 180 ug albuterol sulfate MDI
|
1.8 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FEV1 (L) percent predicted
FEV1 percent liters predicted
|
61 percentage of liters expected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 69 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FEV1 (L) percent predicted
FEV1 percent liters predicted post albuterol
|
8 percentage of liters expected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FEV1/FVC percentage
|
56 percentage of liters expected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
SGaw (Lps/cmH2O/L) (specific airway conductance)
|
0.10 Lps/cmH2O/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.08 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FRC (L) (functional residual capacity) observed
|
3.9 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
FRC percent of liters predicted
|
138 percentage of liters predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29 • n=5 Participants
|
|
RV (L) (residual volume) observed
|
2.9 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
RV (L) - % predicted
|
131 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37 • n=5 Participants
|
|
TLC (L) (total lung capacity) observed
|
5.9 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
TLC Percent of liters predicted
|
109 percentage of liters predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
|
|
D(L)CO(SB) - ml/min/mmHg observed (Single-breath diffusing capacity )
|
14 ml/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
D(L)CO(SB) - ml/min/mmHg % predicted
|
69 ml/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response:Peak FEV1(L)(Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second)-
|
1.74 liters
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
1.82 liters
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FRC after 30 days (+2h) of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response:Peak FRC (L) (Functional Residual Capacity)
|
3.80 Liters
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
3.72 Liters
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Peak FVC after 30 days (+2h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients.
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) of peak forced vital capaciy (L) after 30 days (+2h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced vital capacity - liters
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Peak FVC (L) (Forced Vital Capacity)- Tiotropium and Placebo
|
3.17 liters
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
3.27 liters
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients.
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) - Peak inspiratory capacity after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Inspiratory capacity- liters
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Peak IC (L) - (Inspiratory Capacity) - Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
2.12 liters
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.24 liters
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) peak Peak FRC/TLC after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) peak Peak FRC/TLC after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Peak FRC/TLC Percentage (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity(L) - Tiotropium or Placebo
|
0.65 percentage of FRC/TLC
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.66 percentage of FRC/TLC
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients.
Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Total lung capacity - liters
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Peak TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium or Placebo
|
5.91 liters
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
5.82 liters
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies Trough FEV1(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
Lung function studies Trough FEV1(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (liters)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FEV1 (L)- (Forced Expiratory Volume) Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
1.68 liters
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
1.71 liters
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies Trough FRC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity(liters)
Lung function studies Trough FRC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity(liters)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC (L)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
3.84 liters
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
3.66 liters
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies Trough FVC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
Lung function studies Trough FVC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FVC (L)- (Forced Vital Capacity) Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
3.12 liters
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
3.15 liters
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies (Trough IC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough inspiratory capacity- liters
Lung function studies (Trough IC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough inspiratory capacity- liters
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough IC (L) Inspiratory Capacity - Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
2.17 liters
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.11 liters
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies Trough FRC/TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
Lung function studies Trough FRC/TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity/Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
0.64 percentage of FRC/TLC
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.62 percentage of FRC/TLC
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Lung function studies Trough TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
Lung function studies Trough TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchodilator Response: Trough TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
|
5.99 liters
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
5.86 liters
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and 30 days (+2h) post dosePopulation: Inspiratory capacity (IC) (mean +/- SD) from baseline and after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients.
IC measurement before and after metronome paced hyperventilation-induced dynamic hyperinflation at baseline and in tiotropium and placebo groups. Measure ratio of functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity at baseline and after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline
Baseline IC (inspiratory capacity)
|
2.09 liters
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
1.76 liters
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline
Placebo IC
|
2.17 liters
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
1.80 liters
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline
Tiotropium IC
|
2.24 liters
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
1.80 liters
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one hour before intervention & 2 hrs. after after 30 daysPopulation: lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients.
Total lung capacity before and after metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation in tiotropium cohort versus placebo. Difference between TLC measured at one hour before intervention \& 2 hrs. after after 30 days of treatment with either placebo or tiotropium
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
n=29 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
TLC (L) Before and After Metronome Paced Hyperventilation Induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo
Before DH (dynamic hyperinflation)
|
5.96 liters
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
5.84 liters
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
|
TLC (L) Before and After Metronome Paced Hyperventilation Induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo
After DH
|
5.84 liters
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
5.78 liters
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to 30 daysPopulation: High-resolution, thin-section scans of the lung were obtained from a subset of 19 patients.
Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to FEV 1; correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema; measures include increase in FEV1 from baseline to peak tiotropium
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FEV1(l) After Tiotropium
|
13.68 percentage of lung tissue
Standard Deviation 18.84
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to 30 daysPopulation: Analysis was carried out per protocol
Correlation between change in inspiratory capacity (L) post metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
IC (Inspiratory Capacity, L) Post Mph (Metronome Paced Hyperventilation) Induced dh (Dynamic Hyperinflation) After Tiotropium and Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema
|
13.68 percentage of lung tissue
Standard Deviation 18.84
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to trough tiotropiumPopulation: High resolution, thin-section scans of the lung were obtained in a subset of 19 patients.
Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to ratio functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity. Specifically, correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
Tiotropium
Includes groups randomized to receive placebo first and Tiotropium first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity (L) After Tiotropium
|
13.68 percentage of lung tissue
Standard Deviation 18.84
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg, Capsule,
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Arthur F Gelb MD Principal Investigator
Arthur F Gelb MD
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place