Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Using the Edmonton Protocol of Steroid Free Immunosuppression

NCT ID: NCT00566813

Last Updated: 2021-04-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-11-30

Study Completion Date

2020-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety of allogeneic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients performed at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). The purpose is to reproduce the Edmonton protocol to demonstrate that pancreatic islets isolated at UIC are safe and of sufficient quality to provide reproducible graft function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes mellitus is becoming an unbearable burden for the health care system worldwide. The incidence of disease has increased over the past 50 years, both for type I and type II diabetes. In 2002, the expenditure for direct and indirect costs of diabetes reached the astronomical amount of $132 billion for the USA alone. The burden suffered by patients is also grave when we consider that diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy are now the leading causes of renal failure and blindness in industrialized countries. Although major improvements in insulin treatment and glycemic control have been achieved, the development of hypoglycemic unawareness still represents a challenging clinical problem in the management of diabetes. Severe hypoglycemic episodes are not only acutely life threatening but lead to overall impairment of the quality of life of diabetic patients. Even under ideal study conditions the pathophysiology of hypoglycemic unawareness is not fully understood. It seems that each hypoglycemic episode reduces the counterregulatory hormone responses and the subjective awareness of the following episode, generating a self-worsening mechanism. Islet transplantation can effectively eliminate severe hypoglycemia and restore good glycemic control. However, there are still several limitations to the widespread application of islet transplantation. First, insulin independence is mostly achieved by transplanting a high number of islets that are harvested from 2-4 donors. Second, post-transplant insulin-independence is progressively lost over time despite continued endogenous insulin secretion. Lastly, current immunosuppression carries potential risks and can only incompletely prevent sensitization of the host and rejection.

At present, clinical trials in islet transplantation face stringent federal regulations, which define islets as a biological drug and islet transplantation as an experimental procedure. Limited resources impose small and uncontrolled trials investigating a limited number of new interventions to improve outcomes.

This study is a Phase 1/2 single center, uncontrolled trial in which 1-3 allogeneic pancreatic islet transplants are performed for each study subject. Post-transplant follow-up continues for 64 weeks after the final islet transplantation. Thereafter, subjects are enrolled for a 5-year follow-up study and a 5 to 10 year follow-up study.

The safety of islet transplantation depends primarily on the incidence of serious and unexpected complications or adverse events and the ability of the cell isolation laboratory to produce uncontaminated islet cell preparations with minimal endotoxin content. All study subjects are followed for safety for one year. An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), composed of 3 members who have training in medicine and/or organ transplantation, will review eligibility and safety data approximately 2 weeks after each islet transplantation and every two months thereafter. An independent monitor knowledge on Good Clinical Practice(GCP) guidelines and regulations monitors the study for compliance with 21 CFR and according to ICH GCP Guidelines. Within the Clinical Research Center, the Scientific Advisory Committee and the Research Subject Advocacy Program monitor safety. These entities report to the Institutional Review Board, which also reviews safety data annually and on occurrence of serious adverse events. The principal investigator also report serious adverse events to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Success: Islet transplantation is considered a success when subjects do not use insulin and they achieve a fasting glucose level not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than three times in a week, and not exceeding two-hour post-prandial values of 180 mg/dL more than four times in a week.

Partial Success: Subjects who have a reduction in insulin requirements but who do not achieve insulin independence and present with a reduction in HbA1c and number of hypoglycemic episodes are considered to have partial success of islet transplantation. Reduction in insulin-requirements are assessed by comparing the pre-transplant insulin requirement recorded over two consecutive days (expressed as insulin units per kg) with the requirement on the two consecutive days preceding the subsequent islet infusion, and the requirements on two consecutive days at six months and again on two consecutive days at one year after the final transplant.

Failure: Absence of measurable levels of C-peptide after transplantation is considered as failure of islet cell transplantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (Islet Cell Transplant)

1-3 Islet transplants by the Edmonton Protocol of Steroid Free Immunosuppression using daclizumab 1 mg/kg IV immediately pre-transplant and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after transplant; sirolimus dosed to maintain serum trough levels 12-15 ng/mL for three months post-transplant and 7-10 ng/mL therafter; tacrolimus dosed to maintain serum trough levels 3-6 ng/mL throughout the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Islet Cell Transplant

Intervention Type DRUG

1-3 allogeneic islet transplants; two doses of basiliximab 20 mg iv.; sirolimus po trough levels 10-15 ng/ml X 3 months, then 7-10 ng/ml; tacrolimus po trough levels 3-6 ng/ml

Group 2 (Islet Cell Transplant plus)

1-3 islet transplants by the Edmonton Protocol of Steroid Free Immunosuppression using daclizumab 1 mg/kg IV immediately pre-transplant and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after transplant; sirolimus dosed to maintain serum trough levels 12-15 ng/mL for 3 months post-transplant and 7-10 mg/mL thereafter; tacrolimus dosed to serum trough levels 3-6 ng/mL throughout the study; etanercept 50 mg IV pre-transplant, 25 mg subcutaneously post-transplant Days 3, 7, 10; exenatide 5-mcg subcutaneously twice daily for I week, then up to 10-mcg twice daily for 6 months after the last islet transplant.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Islet Cell Transplant plus

Intervention Type DRUG

1-3 allogeneic Islets of Langerhans transplantations; two doses of basiliximab 20 mg iv.; sirolimus po daily to maintatin serum levels 12-15 ng/mL for 3 months, and 7-10 ng/mL thereafter; tacrolimus po twice daily to maintain serum levels 3-6 ng/mL; etanercept 50 mg IV before islet transplant, 25 mg subcutaneously post-transplant days 3, 7, 10; exenatide subcutaneously 5 mcg pre-transplant and twice daily for I week, then increased to 10-mcg twice daily for 6 months after the last islet transplant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Islet Cell Transplant

1-3 allogeneic islet transplants; two doses of basiliximab 20 mg iv.; sirolimus po trough levels 10-15 ng/ml X 3 months, then 7-10 ng/ml; tacrolimus po trough levels 3-6 ng/ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Islet Cell Transplant plus

1-3 allogeneic Islets of Langerhans transplantations; two doses of basiliximab 20 mg iv.; sirolimus po daily to maintatin serum levels 12-15 ng/mL for 3 months, and 7-10 ng/mL thereafter; tacrolimus po twice daily to maintain serum levels 3-6 ng/mL; etanercept 50 mg IV before islet transplant, 25 mg subcutaneously post-transplant days 3, 7, 10; exenatide subcutaneously 5 mcg pre-transplant and twice daily for I week, then increased to 10-mcg twice daily for 6 months after the last islet transplant.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Allogeneic islets Islet Cell Transplant + Etanercept + Exenatide

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes \> 5 years complicated by at least one of the following situations despite intensive insulin management:

* Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia at plasma glucose levels \< 54 mg/dL
* Metabolic lability/instability characterized by two or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hospital visits for diabetic ketoacidosis over the last year
* Progressive secondary complications of diabetes:

* Retinopathy-three step progression using the ETDRS grading system or equivalent progression;
* Nephropathy- microalbuminuria rise of 50 µg/min (72 mg/24h) over three months within the past two years despite using an ACE inhibitor;
* Neuropathy-persistent gastroparesis, postural hypotension, neuropathic bowel or bladder, or severe peripheral neuropathy unresponsive to management

Exclusion Criteria

* Co-existing cardiac disease:

* Myocardial infarction within past six months
* Angiographic evidence of non-correctable coronary artery disease
* Ischemia on functional cardiac exam d. Heart failure \> NYHA II
* Active alcohol or substance abuse or cigarette smoking
* Psychiatric disorder: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression that is unstable on medication
* Non-adherence to prescribed regimens
* Active infection including hepatitis C, hepatitis B, HIV
* TB by history, current infection, or under treatment for suspected TB
* History of malignancies except squamous or basal skin cancer
* Stroke within the past 6 months
* BMI \> 26 kg/m2 or body weight \> 70 kg at screening visit
* C-peptide response to glucagon stimulation, any C-peptide ≥ 0.3 ng/mL
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Age less than 18 or greater than 65 years
* Creatinine clearance \< 85 mL/min/1.73 m2 by 24-hour urine collection
* Serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL
* Macroalbuminuria \> 300 mg/24h
* Baseline Hb \< 12 gm/dL in women, \< 13 gm/dL in men
* Baseline liver function tests outside normal range
* Untreated proliferative retinopathy
* Positive pregnancy test, intent for pregnancy, male's intent to procreate, unwilling to use effective contraception, breast-feeding
* Previous transplant or PRA reactivity \> 20%)
* Insulin requirement \> 0.7 IU/kg/day
* HbA1C \> 12%
* Hyperlipidemia
* Chronic use of steroids
* Use of coumadin or other anticoagulant (except aspirin) or PT INR \> 1.5
* Addison's disease
* Allergy to radiographic contrast material
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jose Oberholzer

Professor, Division of Transplantation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Oberholzer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gangemi A, Salehi P, Hatipoglu B, Martellotto J, Barbaro B, Kuechle JB, Qi M, Wang Y, Pallan P, Owens C, Bui J, West D, Kaplan B, Benedetti E, Oberholzer J. Islet transplantation for brittle type 1 diabetes: the UIC protocol. Am J Transplant. 2008 Jun;8(6):1250-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02234.x. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18444920 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IND11807-2004-0532

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Omental Islet Transplant
NCT02821026 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT00434811 COMPLETED PHASE3
Islet Cell Transplant for Type 1 Diabetes
NCT01909245 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2