Trial Outcomes & Findings for Open Label Study of Adalimumab in Subjects Who Have a Sub-optimal Response to Systemic Therapy or Phototherapy (NCT NCT00566722)
NCT ID: NCT00566722
Last Updated: 2011-04-12
Results Overview
The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of a patient's disease. Plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema are rated from 0= clear (no plaque elevation; no scaling; erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration) to 5=very severe (plaque elevation=very marked; scaling=very coarse; erythema=very severe \[extreme red coloration, dusky to deep red coloration\]).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
152 participants
Week 16
2011-04-12
Participant Flow
Patients who were previously treated with etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), or narrow-band ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) and had a sub-optimal response were recruited for participation in the study.
Participants who were receiving more than 1 of the treatments (etanercept, MTX, NB-UVB) at the time of screening must have discontinued 1 therapy (e.g., MTX) at least 30 days before first dose of adalimumab and must have discontinued the other therapy (e.g., NB-UVB) during a specified time before first dose of adalimumab. See Detailed Description.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
41
|
29
|
82
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
39
|
24
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
5
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Did not meet exclusion criteria
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Serious adverse event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Noncompliant with drug administration
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Open Label Study of Adalimumab in Subjects Who Have a Sub-optimal Response to Systemic Therapy or Phototherapy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Total
n=152 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 • n=5 Participants
|
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.60 • n=7 Participants
|
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.70 • n=5 Participants
|
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
106 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Nonresponder imputation (PGA of clear or minimal not achieved) was used for missing data.
The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of a patient's disease. Plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema are rated from 0= clear (no plaque elevation; no scaling; erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration) to 5=very severe (plaque elevation=very marked; scaling=very coarse; erythema=very severe \[extreme red coloration, dusky to deep red coloration\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
|
25 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Nonresponder imputation (PGA of clear \[0\] not achieved) was used for missing data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving a PGA of Clear (0) at Week 16
|
15 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who were enrolled and received a dose of adalimumab were included. Non-responder imputation (1 grade of improvement not achieved) was used for missing data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving at Least 1 Grade of Improvement in PGA at Week 16 Compared to Screening
|
32 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, and 8Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab are included. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data; that is, participants who did not have an evaluation at the time point were assumed to not have achieved a 0 or 1 on the PGA.
The Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis-Severity is a rating of how well their disease is controlled. 0=complete disease control; 1=good disease control; 2=limited disease control; 3=uncontrolled disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
|
13 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
|
22 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 4 and Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data.
The DLQI has 10 items and 6 subscales: symptoms and feelings (Q 1 and 2), daily activities (Q 3 and 4), leisure (Q 5 and 6), work and school (Q 7), personal relationships (Q 8 and 9), and treatment (Q 10). Participants rate how much their skin problem affected their life in previous week. Responses are 0 (not at all) to 3=very much. DLQI=total of scores for all items; max=30; min=0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=80 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
Week 4
|
-4.8 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
-5.2 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
-3.3 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.93
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
Week 16
|
-7.0 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
-6.5 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.44
|
-3.8 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Nonresponder imputation (score of 0 not achieved) was used for missing data.
DLQI total score of 0 indicates psoriasis had no effect at all on participant's life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving DLQI Total Score of 0 at Week 4 and Week 16
Week 4
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving DLQI Total Score of 0 at Week 4 and Week 16
Week 16
|
12 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data.
The Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment is a scale for evaluating pruritus-related to psoriasis over the previous week; values range from 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). A decrease in score indicates an improvement in pruritus.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=81 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment
|
-2.9 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.90
|
-3.0 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
-1.7 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data.
The participant rates his/her pain during the previous week on a 100 mm VAS, from 0=no pain to 100=pain as bad as it could be. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=81 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Involving Psoriatic Plaques and/or Psoriatic Arthritis
|
-14.7 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.41
|
-21.4 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.01
|
-12.7 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab are included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data. Screening data were not available for all participants.
Work and activity impairment due to psoriasis were evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), a 6-item questionnaire that measures effect of psoriasis on number of hours worked and the number of hours missed from work. It also measures the effect on productivity and regular activities: 0=no effect on work/daily activities; 10=psoriasis prevented me from working/doing daily activities. Decreases in values on each part indicate improvement. At Screening, percent time missed in the previous week ranged from 0% to 40%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=25 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=13 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=52 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Work Time Missed Due to Psoriasis
|
0.7 Change in percent time missed
Standard Deviation 3.43
|
1.3 Change in percent time missed
Standard Deviation 4.75
|
-0.1 Change in percent time missed
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data. Screening data were not available for all participants.
Percent overall work impairment was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) (described above). At Screening, overall impairment ranged from 0% to 94%. A decrease in percent overall work impairment indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=25 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=13 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=52 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Psoriasis
|
-4.0 Change in % overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 28.06
|
-6.4 Change in % overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 19.75
|
-2.8 Change in % overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 16.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data. Screening data were not available for all participants.
Percent impairment while working was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, impairment while working ranged from 0% to 90%. A decrease in percent impairment indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=29 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=15 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=59 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Impairment While Working Due to Psoriasis
|
-5.5 Change in % impairment while working
Standard Deviation 30.31
|
-8.0 Change in % impairment while working
Standard Deviation 19.35
|
-1.5 Change in % impairment while working
Standard Deviation 18.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab were included. Last observation carried forward was using for missing data. Screening data were not available for all participants.
Percent impairment in regular activities was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, activity impairment due to psoriasis ranged from 0% to 90%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=40 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=27 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=79 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Activity Impairment Due to Psoriasis
|
-13.3 Change in percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 33.08
|
-12.2 Change in percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 25.62
|
-4.7 Change in percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 23.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Week 16Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included. Last observation carried forward was used for missing data. Screening data were not available for all participants for all items; as a result, not all participants were included in the analysis.
Sleep Problems Index of the Sleep Scale from the Medical Outcomes Study reflects sleep disturbance, perceived sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, and awakening short of breath or with headache. Participant rates each item from "none of the time" to "all of the time" for the previous 4 weeks. Scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale; lower scores indicate less impairment. Decrease in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=40 Participants
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=27 Participants
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=79 Participants
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sleep Problems Index II
|
-9.7 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.01
|
-7.7 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.82
|
-2.0 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.57
|
Adverse Events
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 participants at risk
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 participants at risk
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 participants at risk
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Diverticulitis Meckel's
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peritonitis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Investigations
Helicobacter pylori identification test positive
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sub-optimal Response to MTX
n=41 participants at risk
MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B
n=29 participants at risk
NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse.
|
Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept
n=82 participants at risk
Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.4%
1/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
6.9%
2/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
2.4%
2/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
7.3%
3/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.4%
1/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.3%
3/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.7%
3/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
6.9%
2/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.4%
1/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.2%
5/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
6.1%
5/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
2.4%
2/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Sunburn
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein abnormal
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.4%
1/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
2.4%
2/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
1.2%
1/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.7%
3/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.7%
3/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
4.9%
2/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.00%
0/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.4%
1/41 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
3.4%
1/29 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/82 • 26 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as any event with an onset date that was after the first dose of study drug and an onset date no more than 70 days (10 weeks) after the last dose of study drug. The treatment period was 16 weeks and the follow-up period was 10 weeks.
|
Additional Information
Global Medical Services
Abbott
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Abbott requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. Abbott requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if Abbott needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER