Trial Outcomes & Findings for Yttrium Y 90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, and an AHSCT in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients (NCT NCT00562978)

NCT ID: NCT00562978

Last Updated: 2021-06-18

Results Overview

Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of all measureable evidence of non-evaluable disease. No new lesions. No disease related symptoms. No evidence of non-evaluable disease, including normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. All measureable, evaluable and non-evaluable lesions and sites must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

54 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Assessed up to 5 years post-ASCT

Results posted on

2021-06-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg +
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Overall Study
STARTED
6
48
Overall Study
COMPLETED
5
37
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
11

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg +
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Overall Study
Patient had imaging dose only
1
11

Baseline Characteristics

Yttrium Y 90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, and an AHSCT in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=6 Participants
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=48 Participants
* Preparation for AHSCT: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected via leukapheresis. Samples are analyzed by cytogenetic studies, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement. Patients with an adequate number of collected CD34-positive cells (≥ 3 times 10\^6 /kg) proceed to radioimmunotherapy. * Radioimmunotherapy: Patients receive yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and undergo bone marrow biopsy and dose estimation. * Chemotherapy: Patients receive etoposide IV and cyclophosphamide IV * AHSCT: Patients undergo reinfusion of PBSCs. * Growth factor therapy: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) IV. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. filgrastim cyclophosphamide etoposide AHSCT yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan
Total
n=54 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
54 Years
n=5 Participants
50 Years
n=7 Participants
50 Years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
54 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed up to 5 years post-ASCT

Population: Patients had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.

Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of all measureable evidence of non-evaluable disease. No new lesions. No disease related symptoms. No evidence of non-evaluable disease, including normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. All measureable, evaluable and non-evaluable lesions and sites must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Number of Patients Achieving Complete Response (CR)
4 Participants
32 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From initial of study treatment to Day 100 post-ASCT

Population: Patients had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.

The NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC Version 2.0) are used. The patients, whose toxicities are grade 3 or greater and at possibly related to the study treatment, are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Number of Patients With Grade 3 or Greater Toxicity
5 Participants
37 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From peripheral stem cell infusion (Day0 ASCT) to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Population: Patients had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment

Overall survival (OS) was measured from peripheral stem cell infusion to death from any cause. It was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula. \[Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research: volume II, the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 1987;82:1-406.\]

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
5-Year Overall Survival (Phase II)
60 percentage of probability
Interval 13.0 to 88.0
86 percentage of probability
Interval 71.0 to 94.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From peripheral stem cell infusion (Day0 ASCT) to first observation of relapse or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 years

Population: Patients had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment

Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from peripheral stem cell infusion to relapse or death. In a clinical trial, measuring the disease-free survival is one way to see how well a new treatment works. Disease-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the 95% confidence interval was calculated using Greenwood's formula \[Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research: volume II, the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 1987;82:1-406.\]

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 Participants
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
5-Year Disease-free Survival (Phase II)
60 percentage of probability
Interval 13.0 to 88.0
62 percentage of probability
Interval 45.0 to 76.0

Adverse Events

Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 3 deaths

Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg

Serious events: 20 serious events
Other events: 37 other events
Deaths: 15 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 participants at risk
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 participants at risk
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity (including drug fever)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Investigations
Failure to engraft
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood/Bone Marrow - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Bone marrow cellularity
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytes (total WBC)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Platelets
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrhythmia - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular and nodal arrhythmia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac General - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Edema
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Extensive Skin Rash
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatology/Skin - Other (Specify, __)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus/itching
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Endocrine disorders
Endocrine - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorexia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Febrile neutropenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection with unknown ANC
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster (COH)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection without neutropenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Bacterial (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Fungal (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Viral (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
AST, SGOT(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Creatinine
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose, serum-high (hyperglycemia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Neurology - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea (shortness of breath)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis (radiographic changes)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary/Upper Respiratory - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Investigations
Secondary Malignancy - possibly related to cancer treatment (Specify, __)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 40 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=5 participants at risk
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 40 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Zevalin 1000 cGy + VP-16 60 mg/kg + Cytoxan 100 mg/kg
n=37 participants at risk
Zevalin to deliver 1000 cGy highest normal organ excluding spleen and bone marrow with VP-16 60 mg/kg and Cytoxan 100 mg/kg. Patients underwent therapy on day -14 with VP-16 given on day -4, Cytoxan given on day -2 and PBSC infused on day +1.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruising (in absence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatology/Skin - Other (Specify, __)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Flushing
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
32.4%
12/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hair loss/alopecia (scalp or body)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
40.5%
15/37 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity (including drug fever)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Immune system disorders
Allergic rhinitis (including sneezing, nasal stuffiness, postnasal drip)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
18.9%
7/37 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Immune system disorders
Allergy/Immunology - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hearing: patients without baseline audiogram and not enrolled in a monitoring program
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Investigations
Failure to engraft
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood/Bone Marrow - Other (Specify, __)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
37.8%
14/37 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Bone marrow cellularity
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
100.0%
37/37 • Number of events 40 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytes (total WBC)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytes (total WBC) for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
97.3%
36/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
100.0%
37/37 • Number of events 46 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
35.1%
13/37 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
94.6%
35/37 • Number of events 35 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Platelets
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Platelets for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
100.0%
37/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Transfusion: Platelets
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Transfusion: Platelets for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
86.5%
32/37 • Number of events 32 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Transfusion: pRBCs
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Transfusion: pRBCs for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
81.1%
30/37 • Number of events 30 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrhythmia - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular and nodal arrhythmia
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
43.2%
16/37 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac General - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Hypertension
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
59.5%
22/37 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Edema
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Vascular disorders
Prothrombin Time
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Vascular disorders
INR (International Normalized Ratio of prothrombin time)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Vascular disorders
PTT (Partial Thromboplastin Time)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Constitutional Symptoms - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
94.6%
35/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Fever (in the absence of neutropenia, where neutropenia is defined as ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
29.7%
11/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Insomnia
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
70.3%
26/37 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Rigors/chills
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
56.8%
21/37 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Sweating (diaphoresis)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Weight gain
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Weight loss
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
32.4%
12/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Extensive Skin Rash
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection site reaction/extravasation changes
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pigmentation changes (e.g., vitiligo)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus/itching
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
43.2%
16/37 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash/dermatitis associated with high-dose chemotherapy or BMT studies.
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
43.2%
16/37 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash/desquamation
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash/desquamation associated with graft versus host disease (GVHD)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash: hand-foot skin reaction
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria (hives, welts, wheals)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Wound complication, non-infectious
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection - Other (Specify, __)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Endocrine disorders
Endocrine - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Endocrine disorders
Hot flashes/flushes
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorexia
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
70.3%
26/37 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites (non-malignant)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
81.1%
30/37 • Number of events 32 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth/salivary gland (xerostomia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
29.7%
11/37 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
51.4%
19/37 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis (including bile reflux gastritis)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Heartburn/dyspepsia
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
62.2%
23/37 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
97.3%
36/37 • Number of events 38 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary gland changes/saliva
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
18.9%
7/37 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis/pharyngitis (oral/pharyngeal mucositis) for BMT studies, if specified in the protocol.
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
100.0%
37/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Taste alteration (dysgeusia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
35.1%
13/37 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ulcer, GI
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
97.3%
36/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hematemesis
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hematuria (in the absence of vaginal bleeding)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoptysis
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage/bleeding with grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
32.4%
12/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage/bleeding without grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Melena/GI bleeding
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Rectal bleeding/hematochezia
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage, GU
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemorrhage/Bleeding - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Petechiae/purpura (hemorrhage/bleeding into skin or mucosa)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic enlargement
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Febrile neutropenia
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
81.1%
30/37 • Number of events 30 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection with unknown ANC
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster (COH)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection without neutropenia
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Bacterial (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Fungal (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Infection, Viral (COH)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
73.0%
27/37 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
AST, SGOT(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
64.9%
24/37 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
100.0%
37/37 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Alkaline phosphatase
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Amylase
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Bicarbonate, serum-low
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
70.3%
26/37 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Calcium, serum-low (hypocalcemia)
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
97.3%
36/37 • Number of events 36 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Cholesterol, serum-high (hypercholesteremia)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
64.9%
24/37 • Number of events 24 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Creatinine
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose, serum-high (hyperglycemia)
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
67.6%
25/37 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose, serum-low (hypoglycemia)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Magnesium, serum-high (hypermagnesemia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Magnesium, serum-low (hypomagnesemia)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
59.5%
22/37 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Phosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
75.7%
28/37 • Number of events 29 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Potassium, serum-high (hyperkalemia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
89.2%
33/37 • Number of events 35 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sodium, serum-high (hypernatremia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Sodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
78.4%
29/37 • Number of events 29 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Triglyceride, serum-high (hypertriglyceridemia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Uric acid, serum-high (hyperuricemia)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis (non-septic)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness, generalized or specific area (not due to neuropathy)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal/Soft Tissue - Other (Specify, __)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia (incoordination)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Confusion
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
40.5%
15/37 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Extrapyramidal/involuntary movement/restlessness
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Hallucinations
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Mood alteration
80.0%
4/5 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
56.8%
21/37 • Number of events 33 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Neurology - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy: motor
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy: sensory
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
32.4%
12/37 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence/depressed level of consciousness
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Speech impairment (e.g., dysphasia or aphasia)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope (fainting)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Eye disorders
Dry eye syndrome
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Eye disorders
Ocular surface disease
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Eye disorders
Ocular/Visual - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Eye disorders
Ophthalmoplegia/diplopia (double vision)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Pain
100.0%
5/5 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
86.5%
32/37 • Number of events 88 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Pain - Other (Specify, __)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
62.2%
23/37 • Number of events 55 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia, Other (COH)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
56.8%
21/37 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea (shortness of breath)
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccoughs (hiccups, singultus)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
37.8%
14/37 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
18.9%
7/37 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion (non-malignant)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis (radiographic changes)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
0.00%
0/37 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary/Upper Respiratory - Other (Specify, __)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Incontinence
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal/Genitourinary - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary frequency/urgency
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention (including neurogenic bladder)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine color change
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Investigations
Secondary Malignancy - possibly related to cancer treatment (Specify, __)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Irregular menses (change from baseline)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Libido
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
General disorders
Syndromes - Other (Specify, __)
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event and Vital Status data both were captured from the initial treatment to the off protocol, up to 5 years.
Among the 54 enrolled patients, 12 patients had unfavorable bio-distribution on imaging dose. Those 12 patients didn't receive any study drug and had no toxicity data collected. Therefore, the adverse event data are based on the 42 patients, who had favorable bio-distribution on imaging dose and received the study treatment.

Additional Information

Dr. Auayporn Nademanee

City of Hope National Medical Center

Phone: 626-256-4673

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place