Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment for Bipolar Depression: Acute & Prophylactic Efficacy With Citalopram (NCT NCT00562861)

NCT ID: NCT00562861

Last Updated: 2017-03-24

Results Overview

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale assessed in mixed effects regression model. The total range for the scale is 0 to 60. Lower values involve less depression, while higher values involve worse depression. The change in the MADRS scale is interpreted as higher values meaning better outcomes, because more depressive symptoms are improved.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Target enrollment

119 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 weeks

Results posted on

2017-03-24

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Mood Stabilizer Plus Citalopram
citalopram + mood stabilizer: Citalopram dose will be flexibly designed, beginning at 10 mg/d for at least one week, and the increased by 10 mg per week to a maximum of 50 mg/d.
Mood Stabilizer Plus Placebo
Mood stabilizer alone will be the treatment, with placebo used instead of double-blind citalopram.
Overall Study
STARTED
60
59
Overall Study
COMPLETED
40
48
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
20
11

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Mood Stabilizer Plus Citalopram
citalopram + mood stabilizer: Citalopram dose will be flexibly designed, beginning at 10 mg/d for at least one week, and the increased by 10 mg per week to a maximum of 50 mg/d.
Mood Stabilizer Plus Placebo
Mood stabilizer alone will be the treatment, with placebo used instead of double-blind citalopram.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
1
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
5
5
Overall Study
noncompliance, moved
7
2
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
7
3

Baseline Characteristics

Treatment for Bipolar Depression: Acute & Prophylactic Efficacy With Citalopram

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Mood Stabilizer Plus Citalopram
n=60 Participants
citalopram + mood stabilizer: Subjects receive the active drug, added to standard mood stabilizers.
Mood Stabilizer Plus Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo plus mood stabilizer: subjects receive placebo, added to standard mood stabilizers
Total
n=119 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=7 Participants
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants
n=5 Participants
59 participants
n=7 Participants
119 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Population: All patients randomized were analyzed in intent to treat manner.

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale assessed in mixed effects regression model. The total range for the scale is 0 to 60. Lower values involve less depression, while higher values involve worse depression. The change in the MADRS scale is interpreted as higher values meaning better outcomes, because more depressive symptoms are improved.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Citalopram
n=60 Participants
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind citalopram
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind placebo
MADRS Rating Scale Change
13.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
15.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9

Adverse Events

Citalopram

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Citalopram
n=60 participants at risk
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind citalopram
Placebo
n=59 participants at risk
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind placebo
Psychiatric disorders
suicide
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
0.00%
0/59 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Citalopram
n=60 participants at risk
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind citalopram
Placebo
n=59 participants at risk
Mood stabilizers given as part of standard treatment plus double-blind placebo
Psychiatric disorders
sedation
13.3%
8/60 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
5.1%
3/59 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Nervous system disorders
dry mouth
10.0%
6/60 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
0.00%
0/59 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Nervous system disorders
sexual dysfunction
8.3%
5/60 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
0.00%
0/59 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Nervous system disorders
headache
6.7%
4/60 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
10.2%
6/59 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea
5.0%
3/60 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
10.2%
6/59 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhea
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
8.5%
5/59 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
Nervous system disorders
tremor
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.
6.8%
4/59 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events are reported for 1 year of follow-up during the randomized trial.
All patients were systematically interviewed for the adverse events reported.

Additional Information

Nassir Ghaemi

Tufts Medical Center

Phone: 6176365735

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place