Trial Outcomes & Findings for High Dose CVVHDF Compared to Standard Dose CVVHDF (NCT NCT00561431)

NCT ID: NCT00561431

Last Updated: 2015-04-14

Results Overview

The primary objective is to determine whether Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) using an effluent rate of 35 ml/hr/kg (high dose) leads to an increased participant survival time as compared to CVVHDF using the standard effluent rate of 25 ml/hr/kg as measured by days on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at enrollment up to 30 days.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 30 days

Results posted on

2015-04-14

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
Standard dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 20 ml/kg/hr
High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
High dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 35 ml/kg/hr
Overall Study
STARTED
100
100
Overall Study
COMPLETED
100
100
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

High Dose CVVHDF Compared to Standard Dose CVVHDF

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
Standard dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 20 ml/kg/hr
High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
High dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 35 ml/kg/hr
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
64 Participants
n=7 Participants
121 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=5 Participants
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=7 Participants
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants
n=5 Participants
100 participants
n=7 Participants
200 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Population: Intention to treat

The primary objective is to determine whether Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) using an effluent rate of 35 ml/hr/kg (high dose) leads to an increased participant survival time as compared to CVVHDF using the standard effluent rate of 25 ml/hr/kg as measured by days on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at enrollment up to 30 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
Standard dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 20 ml/kg/hr
High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
High dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 35 ml/kg/hr
Number of Participants Alive at 30 Days After Enrollment Compared Between High Dose Versus Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
56 participants
49 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Population: intention to treat

The number of participants who recover renal function at 30 days after enrollment in each arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
Standard dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 20 ml/kg/hr
High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 Participants
High dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 35 ml/kg/hr
Recovery of Renal Function, Defined as Not Requiring Dialysis After Discontinuation of CRRT
37 Participants
28 Participants

Adverse Events

Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)

Serious events: 63 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)

Serious events: 72 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Standard Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 participants at risk
Standard dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 20 ml/kg/hr
High Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
n=100 participants at risk
High dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at an effluent rate of 35 ml/kg/hr
General disorders
death
44.0%
44/100 • Number of events 44 • Time on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration up to 30 days.
The adverse events of death and non renal recovery were not related to the intervention or unexpected. The therapy did not affect this outcome.
51.0%
51/100 • Number of events 51 • Time on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration up to 30 days.
The adverse events of death and non renal recovery were not related to the intervention or unexpected. The therapy did not affect this outcome.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
63.0%
63/100 • Number of events 63 • Time on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration up to 30 days.
The adverse events of death and non renal recovery were not related to the intervention or unexpected. The therapy did not affect this outcome.
72.0%
72/100 • Number of events 72 • Time on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration up to 30 days.
The adverse events of death and non renal recovery were not related to the intervention or unexpected. The therapy did not affect this outcome.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Ashita Tolwani, M.D.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Phone: 2059752021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place