Major Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation (SPOG60+)

NCT ID: NCT00560911

Last Updated: 2007-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Self-management is safe and reliable in patients with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). However, no study has yet assessed the safety and efficacy of OAC self-management in elderly patients with major thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications as primary outcomes.

In this multi-centre, open, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 60 years or will be randomised into a self-management or routine care group and followed up for at least two years.

The primary hypothesis of the study is that self-management of oral anticoagulation is superior compared to routine control in terms of reducing thromboembolic events requiring hospitalisation and all major bleeding complications as the primary endpoint.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been shown to be highly effective in preventing thromboembolic complications in patients for whom it is indicated. Numerous studies have documented that elderly patients seem to benefit most from OAC therapy. Atrial fibrillation (AF), the incidence of which increases with age and approaches 10% for individuals aged ≥ 80 years, carries the main risk for stroke, and among elderly patients without antithrombotic therapy,

Despite its proven benefit, numerous studies have reported reluctance in prescribing OAC due to a variety of barriers, especially in the elderly. Risk of haemorrhage, which is in fact twice as great in those over 70 years of age as in younger patients, is one of the major determinants of refusal to prescribe OAC therapy. The risk of stroke rises steeply in patients with atrial fibrillation when INR values are less than 1.8 and INR values greater than 4 to 5 are rapidly associated with increased bleeding rates. Due to relatively small therapeutic ranges, the reality is often that only a small percentage of the INR values have been found to be within the target range, which can be low as 29% of INR measurements, as seen in routine care patients prior to participation in a randomised self-management programme study.

One way to improve OAC care is by introducing patients' self-management of OAC therapy. In this context it is important to differentiate between INR self-testing alone, and full self-management. Self-management includes self-adaptation of the anticoagulation treatment based on self-monitoring results after the patients have participated in a structured instruction and treatment programme.

Our study aims to provide answers to this important medical question by examining elderly patients receiving long-term anticoagulation treatment and randomised into self-management versus routine-care groups, with thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications as primary outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Long-Term Oral Anticoagulated Patients

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

oral anticoagulation self-management elderly patients randomised controlled trial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1Self-management

Group Type OTHER

educational program for the self-management of OAC

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in the self-management group participated in 4 consecutive weekly instruction sessions of 90 to 120 minutes each, in groups of 3 to 6 patients.

After participation in the structured programme, the patients were encouraged to control their INR values by self-monitoring once a week and to adjust their anticoagulant dosage accordingly.

2 Routine control

Group Type OTHER

1 hour education - afterwards physician leaded OAC control

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in the routine control group participated a single 90-minute session

During the whole study period, they were advised with regard to changes in the anticoagulant dosage by their usual attending physicians, either in general practice or at a hospital-based specialised anticoagulation clinic.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

educational program for the self-management of OAC

Patients in the self-management group participated in 4 consecutive weekly instruction sessions of 90 to 120 minutes each, in groups of 3 to 6 patients.

After participation in the structured programme, the patients were encouraged to control their INR values by self-monitoring once a week and to adjust their anticoagulant dosage accordingly.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

1 hour education - afterwards physician leaded OAC control

Patients in the routine control group participated a single 90-minute session

During the whole study period, they were advised with regard to changes in the anticoagulant dosage by their usual attending physicians, either in general practice or at a hospital-based specialised anticoagulation clinic.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* long-term anticoagulation
* either with phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol
* age ≥ 60 years
* written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* previous participation in a self-management OAC programme
* severe cognitive
* terminal illness
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boehringer Mannheim

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of Graz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ulrike Didjurgeit, psychologist

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

DIeM - Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cologne, Germany

Andrea Siebenhofer, consultant

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University Graz

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

DIeM - Institute for Evidence-based Medicine

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Siebenhofer A, Rakovac I, Kleespies C, Piso B, Didjurgeit U. Self-management of oral anticoagulation in the elderly: rationale, design, baselines and oral anticoagulation control after one year of follow-up. A randomized controlled trial. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Mar;97(3):408-16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17334508 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPOG60+

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id