The Effect of Motor Control Exercise Versus General Exercise on Lumbar Local Stabilizing Muscles Thickness

NCT ID: NCT00555802

Last Updated: 2008-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-04-30

Study Completion Date

2007-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of motor control exercises. For this, before and after motor control and general exercises, we determined transverses abdominis and multifidus thickness, activity limitation and pain. We hypothesized that the motor control exercises would increase transverses abdominis and multifidus muscles thickness. Activity limitation and pain would decrease following two protocols that it was more in motor control group than general one.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Musculoskeletal disorders, of which back pain accounts for more than half the number of cases, are the most common cause of chronic incapacity in industrialized countries. Approximately 10-20 percent of patients with low back pain develop chronic pain, defined as low back pain persisting more than 3 months. Low back pain represents a particularly costly sociomedical problem because of the expenditure associated with repeated treatment and the long-term absence from work and need for social support. These patients use more than 80% of health care resources for back problems, and treatment has a low success rate. Thus, the development of effective interventions aimed at management of the chronic problems is urgently required.

Review of studies showed that the effectiveness of stabilization exercises in patients with nonspecific LBP is not yet fully established. In clinical trials that improvement reported after motor control exercise, other intervention accompanied with these exercises. Also, the results of motor control exercise studies are different. On the other hand, the evidence underpins the primary aim of motor control exercise, which is to re-establish normal control of the deep spinal muscles, reducing the activity of more superficial muscles that tend to stiffen the spine and have increased activity in low back pain, and then maintain normal control during progressively more demanding physical and functional tasks. For these reasons, we decided to identify the efficacy of motor control exercises, usually considered as specific trunk muscle stabilization exercises. A randomized controlled trial was only way for identifying the role of these exercises in treating chronic low back pain. Also, our choice coincides with the research agenda set by the 2004 European Guideline.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exercise

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* nonspecific low back pain with or without leg pain of at least 3 months duration
* currently seeking care for low back pain
* aged greater than 18 and less than 80 years
* suitable for motor control exercise based on clinical assessment
* The patients must also have sufficient knowledge of the Persian language to understand instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* suspected or confirmed serious spinal pathology (fracture, metastatic, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine, cauda equine syndrome, widespread neurological disorder)
* suspected or confirmed pregnancy
* nerve root compromise (2 of strength, reflex or sensation affected for same nerve root)
* spinal surgery
* any of the contraindications to exercise listed on page 42 of the ACSM guidelines
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Asghar Akbari

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Deputy of research, Zahedan university of medical scinces

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of physiotherapy, Zahedan university of medical scinces

Zahedan, Sistan & Bladchestan, Iran

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iran

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maher CG, Latimer J, Hodges PW, Refshauge KM, Moseley GL, Herbert RD, Costa LO, McAuley J. The effect of motor control exercise versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain [ACTRN012605000262606]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Nov 4;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-54.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16271149 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.spine-health.com

Spine-health.com has organized its peer-reviewed articles and patient information into Health Hubs dedicated to specific conditions, treatments, and pain management topics.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

86-1534

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.