Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib 40mg vs. Ketoprofen 100mg In The Management Of Acute Renal Colic (NCT NCT00553605)

NCT ID: NCT00553605

Last Updated: 2013-01-28

Results Overview

mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 30 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 30 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

340 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Minute 30

Results posted on

2013-01-28

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Parecoxib
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Overall Study
STARTED
176
164
Overall Study
Treated
174
164
Overall Study
COMPLETED
172
161
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Parecoxib
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Overall Study
Did not meet entrance criteria
1
3
Overall Study
Did not receive full dose
1
0
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
2
0

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib 40mg vs. Ketoprofen 100mg In The Management Of Acute Renal Colic

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Parecoxib
n=174 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Total
n=338 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Less than (<) 18 years
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
131 participants
n=5 Participants
109 participants
n=7 Participants
240 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
41 participants
n=5 Participants
54 participants
n=7 Participants
95 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to (>=) 65 years
1 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
110 Participants
n=5 Participants
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
213 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 30

Population: Per-protocol (PP): all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug; had 1 post-baseline pain assessment; no major protocol violations; received appropriate dose of study drug; had valid baseline, 15 and 30 min VAS pain assessments; did not take rescue medications for 30 min; had confirmed diagnosis of nephrolithiasis.

mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 30 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 30 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=156 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=141 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Mean Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes (mPID30min)
34.147 mm
Standard Error 3.35
35.266 mm
Standard Error 3.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 120

Population: Modified intent- to-treat (mITT) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment.

mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 120 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 120 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=173 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Mean Pain Intensity Difference at 120 Min (mPID120min)
51.608 mm
Standard Error 2.02
51.697 mm
Standard Error 2.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at specific time point for each treatment arm respectively.

PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=173 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Baseline (n= 173, 164)
77.14 mm
Standard Deviation 17.92
76.99 mm
Standard Deviation 18.26
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 15 (n= 173, 164)
50.42 mm
Standard Deviation 26.92
50.95 mm
Standard Deviation 24.65
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 30 (n= 172, 162)
34.13 mm
Standard Deviation 28.57
33.65 mm
Standard Deviation 26.64
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 45 (n= 163, 156)
21.75 mm
Standard Deviation 24.89
23.15 mm
Standard Deviation 24.93
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 60 (n= 156, 152)
14.62 mm
Standard Deviation 21.25
17.53 mm
Standard Deviation 23.17
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 90 (n= 151, 144)
9.80 mm
Standard Deviation 17.16
12.27 mm
Standard Deviation 20.22
Time-specific Pain Intensity (PI) VAS Score
Minute 120 (n= 147, 139)
7.68 mm
Standard Deviation 14.29
8.02 mm
Standard Deviation 15.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each treatment arm respectively.

PID score was obtained by subtracting the PI-VAS at each time point from baseline PI score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. PID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=173 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 15 (n= 173, 164)
26.72 mm
Standard Deviation 24.59
26.04 mm
Standard Deviation 26.13
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 30 (n= 172, 162)
42.89 mm
Standard Deviation 28.70
43.22 mm
Standard Deviation 29.39
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 45 (n= 163, 156)
54.37 mm
Standard Deviation 27.82
53.55 mm
Standard Deviation 27.98
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 60 (n= 156, 152)
61.35 mm
Standard Deviation 25.44
59.34 mm
Standard Deviation 26.28
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 90 ( n= 151, 144)
65.99 mm
Standard Deviation 22.88
64.33 mm
Standard Deviation 25.05
Time-specific Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120
Minute 120 (n= 147, 139)
68.07 mm
Standard Deviation 21.14
68.51 mm
Standard Deviation 21.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Minute 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

TOTPAR: time-weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) over 120 min. TOTPAR score range was 0 (worst) to 480 (best). PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=171 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=162 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Score Over 120 Min (TOTPAR120min)
362.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 10.65
352.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 10.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 30, 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable at specific time point for each treatment arm respectively.

PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0= None, 1= a little, 2= Some, 3= a lot and 4= Complete relief.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=171 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=162 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30: none (n= 171, 162)
10 participants
9 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30: a little (n= 171, 162)
21 participants
19 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30: some (n= 171, 162)
35 participants
44 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30: a lot (n= 171, 162)
74 participants
65 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 30: complete (n= 171, 162)
31 participants
25 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 120: none (n= 146, 139)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 120: a little (n= 146, 139)
0 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 120: some (n= 146, 139)
16 participants
8 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 120: a lot (n= 146, 139)
40 participants
46 participants
Number of Participants With Pain Relief (PR)
Minute 120: complete (n= 146, 139)
89 participants
80 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 30

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. Responders were those who had a decreased in VAS of at least 20 mm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=172 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=162 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Number of Participants With Response in Pain Intensity
132 participants
124 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 30, 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Participants' response to the question "How would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 4-point categorical scale, 1=Poor, 2= Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent was evaluated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=172 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=163 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: poor
12 participants
10 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: fair
21 participants
17 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: good
76 participants
66 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: excellent
63 participants
70 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: poor
8 participants
5 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: fair
16 participants
16 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: good
49 participants
46 participants
Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: excellent
98 participants
96 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Minute 30, 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Physicians' response to the question "How would you rate the study medication the patient received for pain?" on a 4-point categorical scale, 1=Poor, 2= Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent was evaluated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=172 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=163 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: poor
11 participants
11 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: fair
22 participants
23 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: good
69 participants
63 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 30: excellent
70 participants
66 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: poor
8 participants
8 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: fair
14 participants
15 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: good
45 participants
45 participants
Physician's Global Evaluation of Study Medication
Minute 120: excellent
104 participants
95 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Minute 120

Population: mITT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug with at least 1 post-baseline pain assessment.

Rescue medications included intravenous 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kilogram (kg) of morphine or 1 mg/kg of pethidine or muscle relaxants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parecoxib
n=173 Participants
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 Participants
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Number of Participants With Use of Rescue Medication (RM)
26 participants
25 participants

Adverse Events

Parecoxib

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 47 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ketoprofen

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 55 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Parecoxib
n=174 participants at risk
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 participants at risk
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Condition aggravated
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Drug exposure during pregnancy
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus ureteric
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
1.1%
2/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
7/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Parecoxib
n=174 participants at risk
Single dose of parecoxib 40 milligram (mg) solution intravenously by bolus injection followed by single dose of 100 milliliter (mL) solution of placebo matched to ketoprofen intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Ketoprofen
n=164 participants at risk
Single bolus injection of 2 mL solution of placebo matched to parecoxib followed by single dose of ketoprofen 100 mg solution intravenously by slow injection over 20 minutes.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
2/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.1%
2/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
4/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
4/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
4.0%
7/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
5/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
2.3%
4/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
5/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Chills
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
2/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Pain
3.4%
6/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.5%
9/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Pyrexia
1.7%
3/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Vessel puncture site pain
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
1.1%
2/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.8%
3/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
4.0%
7/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
2/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness postural
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
1.7%
3/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
4/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
1.7%
3/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal pain
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
1.1%
2/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Angiopathy
0.00%
0/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.57%
1/174
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.61%
1/164
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER