Reducing Sex-Related HIV Risk Behaviors in Patients Receiving Treatment for Opioid Dependence

NCT ID: NCT00548275

Last Updated: 2020-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The major goal is to determine in patients entering buprenorphine treatment, the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, their physician's screening of these behaviors and to evaluate the impact of risk reduction counseling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The profile of opioid dependence is changing in the United States. According to the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 3.7 million Americans had used heroin at least once in their lifetime and over half a million individuals had used heroin within the past year. Approximately 323,000 individuals met criteria for past-year heroin abuse or dependence. While these figures are concerning, the increasing prevalence of prescription opioid abuse and dependence is also worrisome. In 2006 12.6 million reported non-medical use of prescription opioids. Of these, 1.6 million met criteria for prescription opioid abuse or dependence. Sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent amongst opioid dependent individuals with one study reporting unprotected intercourse within the prior 30 days in 75% of patients. Given that 79-85% of U.S. HIV/AIDS cases are secondary to sexual transmission, as non-injecting drug use increases, the relative contribution of sex-related HIV risk behaviors will increase as well. While drug treatment with methadone, and more recently buprenorphine (BUP), a new medication effective for the treatment of opioid dependence that can be prescribed by office-based physicians, has been shown to decrease drug-related HIV risk behaviors, my prior research demonstrates that BUP does not appear to impact as significantly on sex-related HIV risk behaviors. While the process of HIV risk behavior change begins with risk assessment, studies have shown that physicians, in general, frequently do not address risky behaviors with their patients. The current literature is lacking, however, with regards to the prevalence of specific high-risk sexual behaviors in patients enrolled in BUP treatment. Interventions specifically targeted at counseling for sex-related HIV risk behaviors delivered to patients receiving BUP treatment have not been refined. The proposed research will evaluate the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors in patients enrolled in office-based BUP treatment and the patients' perception of their providers' screening for these behaviors (Phase 1). These results will inform the conduct of a subsequent randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a sex-related HIV risk reduction counseling intervention (Phase 2).

Phase 1. We hypothesize that sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent in opioid dependent patients enrolled in BUP treatment and that patients will report that their providers fail to screen for these behaviors. The specific aims are to determine in patients entering BUP treatment: 1) the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, and 2) by patient report, their provider's screening of these behaviors.

Phase 2. We hypothesize that in opioid dependent patients receiving office-based BUP, Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM) will be more effective in increasing specific safe sex practices compared with standard physician counseling, Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM) and that it will demonstrate cost-effectiveness overall when compared to SSRM. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are 1) to determine the efficacy of ESRM compared to SSRM, in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment and 2) To compare the cost-effectiveness of ESRM versus SSRM in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment. These interventions will be adapted from existing effective interventions evaluated in two recently conducted multi-site randomized clinical trials, the CDC-funded Project RESPECT and the NIMH-funded Project Light.20, 21

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opiate Dependence HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM): Patients assigned to ESRM will attend 4 individual gender-specific interactive counseling sessions, once weekly over a four-week period. They will attend 2 sessions (20 minutes, weeks 2 and 3) followed by 2 sessions (40 minutes, weeks 4 and 5) that will be gender-specific to the patient and gender-matched with the study physicians (one female and one male) who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Sessions will include skill-building in condom use, safer sex negotiation, self-control of triggers and coping skills, didactic materials, and distribution of written material and address self-perception of risk, barriers to risk reduction, and negotiation of a risk-reduction plan.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enhanced Sexual Risk Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

management of sexual risk

2

Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM): In SSRM, patients will attend two 10-minute gender non-specific individual educational sessions about HIV/AIDS provided by one of the study physicians who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Session 1 will coincide with the physician visit at the time of randomization. The patient will receive pre-test counseling at this time and undergo HIV antibody testing. Session 2 will take place 7 days later when the patient returns to receive their HIV test results and post-test counseling. In addition, subjects will receive didactic prevention messages about HIV relevant to their reported risks and will be asked if they have questions regarding this information.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Sexual Risk Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

management of sexual risk

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enhanced Sexual Risk Management

management of sexual risk

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Sexual Risk Management

management of sexual risk

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for current opioid dependence
* HIV risk behaviors

Exclusion Criteria

* current dependence on benzodiazepines or sedatives
* current suicide or homicide risk
* current psychotic disorder or untreated major depression
* inability to read or understand English
* unstable medical problems
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lynn E Sullivan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Methadone Research Unit, The APT Foundation, Inc.

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Yale-New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0609001848

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.