Reducing Sex-Related HIV Risk Behaviors in Patients Receiving Treatment for Opioid Dependence
NCT ID: NCT00548275
Last Updated: 2020-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-07-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Buprenorphine and Integrated HIV Care
NCT00317460
Buprenorphine and Integrated HIV Care Evaluation
NCT00124358
Integrating Buprenorphine Into HIV Treatment
NCT00241930
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage at Sexual Health Clinics Using Buprenorphine
NCT04991974
Reducing Drug Use and HIV Risk in Drug-dependent Adults Arrested for Prostitution
NCT01560221
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase 1. We hypothesize that sex-related HIV risk behaviors are prevalent in opioid dependent patients enrolled in BUP treatment and that patients will report that their providers fail to screen for these behaviors. The specific aims are to determine in patients entering BUP treatment: 1) the prevalence of specific sex-related HIV risk behaviors, and 2) by patient report, their provider's screening of these behaviors.
Phase 2. We hypothesize that in opioid dependent patients receiving office-based BUP, Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM) will be more effective in increasing specific safe sex practices compared with standard physician counseling, Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM) and that it will demonstrate cost-effectiveness overall when compared to SSRM. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are 1) to determine the efficacy of ESRM compared to SSRM, in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment and 2) To compare the cost-effectiveness of ESRM versus SSRM in individuals enrolled in BUP treatment. These interventions will be adapted from existing effective interventions evaluated in two recently conducted multi-site randomized clinical trials, the CDC-funded Project RESPECT and the NIMH-funded Project Light.20, 21
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Enhanced Sexual Risk Management (ESRM): Patients assigned to ESRM will attend 4 individual gender-specific interactive counseling sessions, once weekly over a four-week period. They will attend 2 sessions (20 minutes, weeks 2 and 3) followed by 2 sessions (40 minutes, weeks 4 and 5) that will be gender-specific to the patient and gender-matched with the study physicians (one female and one male) who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Sessions will include skill-building in condom use, safer sex negotiation, self-control of triggers and coping skills, didactic materials, and distribution of written material and address self-perception of risk, barriers to risk reduction, and negotiation of a risk-reduction plan.
Enhanced Sexual Risk Management
management of sexual risk
2
Standard Sexual Risk Management (SSRM): In SSRM, patients will attend two 10-minute gender non-specific individual educational sessions about HIV/AIDS provided by one of the study physicians who will be trained in HIV testing and risk counseling. Session 1 will coincide with the physician visit at the time of randomization. The patient will receive pre-test counseling at this time and undergo HIV antibody testing. Session 2 will take place 7 days later when the patient returns to receive their HIV test results and post-test counseling. In addition, subjects will receive didactic prevention messages about HIV relevant to their reported risks and will be asked if they have questions regarding this information.
Standard Sexual Risk Management
management of sexual risk
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Enhanced Sexual Risk Management
management of sexual risk
Standard Sexual Risk Management
management of sexual risk
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HIV risk behaviors
Exclusion Criteria
* current suicide or homicide risk
* current psychotic disorder or untreated major depression
* inability to read or understand English
* unstable medical problems
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
OTHER
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lynn E Sullivan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methadone Research Unit, The APT Foundation, Inc.
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0609001848
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.