Trial Outcomes & Findings for This Is An Open-Label, Non-Comparative Study Designed To Evaluate A Short Course Of IV Anidulafungin, Followed Optionally By Oral Voriconazole, For The Treatment Of Candidemia And Invasive Candidiasis (NCT NCT00548262)
NCT ID: NCT00548262
Last Updated: 2011-01-17
Results Overview
Clinical Success (cure=resolution of Candida signs and symptoms \[s/s\] or improvement=significant but incomplete resolution of s/s) or Failure (at least 3 doses Anidulafungin with no significant improvement in s/s or death due to Candida) and Microbiological Success (eradication=negative culture for baseline Candida species (spp) or presumed eradication=follow-up (f/u) culture not available (n/a) and clinical outcome defined as success) or Failure (persistence=positive culture for at least 1 baseline Candida spp or presumed persistence=f/u culture n/a and clinical outcome defined as failure).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
54 participants
End of Treatment (EOT) (up to Day 42)
2011-01-17
Participant Flow
The planned sample size for this study was 210 subjects; however, due to slow enrollment, only 54 subjects were screened and randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
32
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
This Is An Open-Label, Non-Comparative Study Designed To Evaluate A Short Course Of IV Anidulafungin, Followed Optionally By Oral Voriconazole, For The Treatment Of Candidemia And Invasive Candidiasis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Between 45 and 64 years
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of Treatment (EOT) (up to Day 42)Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population (MITT): all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participants (took at least 1 dose of study treatment) and with a positive baseline culture for a Candida spp within 96 hours before entry into the study. Success=clinical and microbiological success; Failure=all other combinations. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure.
Clinical Success (cure=resolution of Candida signs and symptoms \[s/s\] or improvement=significant but incomplete resolution of s/s) or Failure (at least 3 doses Anidulafungin with no significant improvement in s/s or death due to Candida) and Microbiological Success (eradication=negative culture for baseline Candida species (spp) or presumed eradication=follow-up (f/u) culture not available (n/a) and clinical outcome defined as success) or Failure (persistence=positive culture for at least 1 baseline Candida spp or presumed persistence=f/u culture n/a and clinical outcome defined as failure).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure) at End of Treatment
Success
|
26 participants
Interval 44.6 to 73.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure) at End of Treatment
Failure
|
18 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of Intravenous Treatment (EIVT) (up to Day 42), Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: MITT. Success=clinical and microbiological success; Failure=all other combinations. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for Failure.
Clinical Success (cure=resolution of Candida signs and symptoms \[s/s\] or improvement=significant but incomplete resolution of s/s) or Failure (at least 3 doses Anidulafungin with no significant improvement in s/s or death due to Candida) and Microbiological Success (eradication=negative culture for baseline Candida species (spp) or presumed eradication=follow-up (f/u) culture not available (n/a) and clinical outcome defined as success) or Failure (persistence=positive culture for at least 1 baseline Candida spp or presumed persistence=f/u culture n/a and clinical outcome defined as failure).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure)
EIVT Success
|
26 participants
Interval 44.6 to 73.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure)
EIVT Failure
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure)
Week 2 Follow-up Success
|
21 participants
Interval 33.0 to 62.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response (Based on Clinical and Microbiological Success or Failure)
Week 2 Follow-up Failure
|
23 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EIVT (up to Day 42)Population: MITT. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for Failure.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Categorized as global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure defined as all other combinations. Global response at EIVT was assessed per the type of Candida species that was isolated at the baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida albicans: Success
|
11 participants
Interval 31.0 to 73.7
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida albicans: Failure
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida famata: Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida famata: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida glabrata: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida guilliermondii: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida guilliermondii: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida krusei: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida krusei: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida parapsilosis: Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 46.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida parapsilosis: Failure
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida pelliculosa: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida pelliculosa: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida tropicalis: Success
|
8 participants
Interval 55.2 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida tropicalis: Failure
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Unidentifiable: Success
|
4 participants
Interval 20.5 to 93.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Unidentifiable: Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EIVT
Candida glabrata: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Day 42)Population: MITT. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for Failure.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Categorized as global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure defined as all other combinations. Global response at EOT was assessed per the type of Candida species that was isolated at the baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida albicans: Success
|
11 participants
Interval 31.0 to 73.7
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida albicans: Failure
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida famata: Success
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida famata: Failure
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida glabrata: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida glabrata: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida guilliermondii: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida krusei: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida krusei: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida parapsilosis: Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 46.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida pelliculosa: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida pelliculosa: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida tropicalis: Failure
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Unidentifiable: Success
|
4 participants
Interval 20.5 to 93.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Unidentifiable: Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida guilliermondii: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida parapsilosis: Failure
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: EOT
Candida tropicalis: Success
|
8 participants
Interval 55.2 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: MITT. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI was not calculated for status of Failure.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Categorized as global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure defined as all other combinations. Global response at Week 2 Follow-up was assessed per the type of Candida species that was isolated at the baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida albicans: Success
|
10 participants
Interval 26.3 to 69.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida albicans: Failure
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida famata: Success
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida guilliermondii: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida krusei: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida krusei: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida pelliculosa: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida tropicalis: Success
|
7 participants
Interval 41.6 to 98.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida tropicalis: Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Unidentifiable: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 62.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida famata: Failure
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida glabrata: Success
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida glabrata: Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida guilliermondii: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida parapsilosis: Success
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida parapsilosis: Failure
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Candida pelliculosa: Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response Per Type of Candida Species Isolated at Baseline: Week 2 Follow-up
Unidentifiable: Failure
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Day 42)Population: MITT. Global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure=all other combinations. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for failure. Due to small sample size, data was insufficient for analysis by status=elderly (\>65 years of age); not summarized.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Global response at EOT was assessed for participants categorized with baseline risk factors (Yes or No status) for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay ≥ 4 days, mechanical ventilation, broad spectrum antibiotics (antibiotics), central venous (CV) catheter, total parental nutrition (TPN), dialysis, abdominal surgery, solid organ transplant, renal insufficiency, chemotherapy, pancreatitis, systemic steroids or immunosuppressives (Systemic steroids/immunos), neutropenic status, or elderly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Success
|
18 participants
Interval 39.1 to 73.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 40.0 to 93.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Success
|
18 participants
Interval 37.6 to 71.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Failure
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Mechanical ventilation (No): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 46.4 to 99.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Mechanical ventilation (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Antibiotics (Yes): Success
|
22 participants
Interval 40.8 to 72.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Chemotherapy (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Neutropenic: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Solid organ transplant (No): Failure
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Antibiotics (No): Success
|
4 participants
Interval 44.9 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Antibiotics (No): Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Antibiotics (Yes): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
CV Catheter (Yes): Success
|
21 participants
Interval 39.5 to 71.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
CV Catheter (Yes): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
CV Catheter (No): Success
|
5 participants
Interval 53.5 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
CV Catheter (No): Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
TPN (Yes): Success
|
5 participants
Interval 12.0 to 64.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
TPN (Yes): Failure
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
TPN (No): Success
|
21 participants
Interval 51.3 to 84.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
TPN (No): Failure
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Dialysis (Yes): Success
|
3 participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Dialysis (Yes): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Dialysis (No): Success
|
23 participants
Interval 46.5 to 77.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Dialysis (No): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Success
|
11 participants
Interval 35.7 to 80.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Failure
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Abdominal surgery (No): Success
|
15 participants
Interval 40.8 to 79.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Abdominal surgery (No): Failure
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Solid organ transplant (No): Success
|
26 participants
Interval 44.6 to 73.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Success
|
3 participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Renal insufficiency (No): Success
|
23 participants
Interval 46.5 to 77.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Renal insufficiency (No): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Chemotherapy (Yes): Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Chemotherapy (No): Success
|
25 participants
Interval 43.4 to 72.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Chemotherapy (No): Failure
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Pancreatitis (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Pancreatitis (Yes): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Pancreatitis (No): Success
|
25 participants
Interval 49.0 to 79.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Pancreatitis (No): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Success
|
6 participants
Interval 21.7 to 78.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Failure
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 45.7 to 79.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Failure
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Neutropenic: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Non-neutropenic: Success
|
18 participants
Interval 44.4 to 79.7
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Pre-specified Baseline Risk Factors Subgroups of Interest: EOT
Non-neutropenic: Failure
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EIVT (up to Day 42)Population: MITT. Global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure=all other combinations. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for failure. Due to small sample size, data was insufficient for analysis by status=elderly \>65 years of age; not summarized.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Global response at EIVT was assessed for participants categorized with baseline risk factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: ICU stay ≥ 4 days, mechanical ventilation, broad spectrum antibiotics (antibiotics), central venous (CV) catheter, total parental nutrition (TPN), dialysis, abdominal surgery, solid organ transplant, renal insufficiency, chemotherapy, pancreatitis, systemic steroids or immunosuppressives (Systemic steroids/immunos), neutropenic status, or elderly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
CV Catheter (No): Success
|
5 participants
Interval 53.5 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
CV Catheter (No): Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
TPN (Yes): Success
|
6 participants
Interval 19.1 to 73.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
TPN (No): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 47.7 to 81.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Failure
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Success
|
3 participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Pancreatitis (No): Success
|
24 participants
Interval 46.3 to 76.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Pancreatitis (No): Failure
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Success
|
7 participants
Interval 30.4 to 86.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Failure
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Neutropenic: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Success
|
18 participants
Interval 39.1 to 73.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 40.0 to 93.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Success
|
18 participants
Interval 37.6 to 71.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Failure
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Mechanical ventilation (No): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 46.4 to 99.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Mechanical ventilation (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Antibiotics (Yes): Success
|
22 participants
Interval 40.8 to 72.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Antibiotics (Yes): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Antibiotics (No): Success
|
4 participants
Interval 44.9 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Antibiotics (No): Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
CV Catheter (Yes): Success
|
21 participants
Interval 39.5 to 71.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
CV Catheter (Yes): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
TPN (Yes): Failure
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
TPN (No): Failure
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Dialysis (Yes): Success
|
3 participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Dialysis (Yes): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Dialysis (No): Success
|
23 participants
Interval 46.5 to 77.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Dialysis (No): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Success
|
12 participants
Interval 41.5 to 84.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Abdominal surgery (No): Success
|
14 participants
Interval 36.5 to 75.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Abdominal surgery (No): Failure
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Solid organ transplant (No): Success
|
26 participants
Interval 44.6 to 73.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Solid organ transplant (No): Failure
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Failure
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Renal insufficiency (No): Success
|
23 participants
Interval 46.5 to 77.8
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Renal insufficiency (No): Failure
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Chemotherapy (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Chemotherapy (Yes): Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Chemotherapy (No): Success
|
25 participants
Interval 43.4 to 72.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Chemotherapy (No): Failure
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Pancreatitis (Yes): Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 82.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Pancreatitis (Yes): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Failure
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Success
|
19 participants
Interval 42.4 to 76.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Neutropenic: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Non-neutropenic: Success
|
18 participants
Interval 44.4 to 79.7
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: EIVT
Non-neutropenic: Failure
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 Follow-up (F/U)Population: MITT. Global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure=all other combinations. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for failure. Due to small sample size, data insufficient for analysis by status=elderly \>65 years of age; not summarized.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Global response at Week 2 F/U was assessed for participants categorized with baseline risk factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: ICU stay ≥ 4 days, mechanical ventilation, broad spectrum antibiotics (antibiotics), central venous (CV) catheter, total parental nutrition (TPN), dialysis, abdominal surgery, solid organ transplant, renal insufficiency, chemotherapy, pancreatitis, systemic steroids or immunosuppressives (Systemic steroids/immunos), neutropenic status, or elderly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Success
|
9 participants
Interval 50.5 to 99.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Antibiotics (Yes): Failure
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Antibiotics (No): Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 82.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Antibiotics (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
CV Catheter (Yes): Success
|
18 participants
Interval 31.5 to 63.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
CV Catheter (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
TPN (Yes): Failure
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 19.9 to 64.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Abdominal surgery (No): Failure
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Renal insufficiency (No): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 38.0 to 70.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Chemotherapy (No): Failure
|
23 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Pancreatitis (Yes): Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 82.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Success
|
12 participants
Interval 20.7 to 54.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
ICU stay ≥ 4 days (Yes): Failure
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Success
|
13 participants
Interval 22.7 to 56.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Mechanical ventilation (Yes): Failure
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Mechanical ventilation (No): Success
|
8 participants
Interval 46.4 to 99.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Mechanical ventilation (No): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Antibiotics (Yes): Success
|
19 participants
Interval 33.0 to 64.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
CV Catheter (Yes): Failure
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
CV Catheter (No): Success
|
3 participants
Interval 10.0 to 90.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
TPN (Yes): Success
|
5 participants
Interval 12.0 to 64.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
TPN (No): Success
|
16 participants
Interval 34.0 to 69.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
TPN (No): Failure
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Dialysis (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Dialysis (Yes): Failure
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Dialysis (No): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 38.0 to 70.1
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Dialysis (No): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Abdominal surgery (Yes): Failure
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Abdominal surgery (No): Success
|
13 participants
Interval 32.4 to 71.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Solid organ transplant (No): Success
|
21 participants
Interval 33.0 to 62.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Solid organ transplant (No): Failure
|
23 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Renal insufficiency (Yes): Failure
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Renal insufficiency (No): Failure
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Chemotherapy (Yes): Success
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Chemotherapy (Yes): Failure
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Chemotherapy (No): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 31.6 to 61.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Pancreatitis (Yes): Failure
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Pancreatitis (No): Success
|
19 participants
Interval 33.0 to 64.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Pancreatitis (No): Failure
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Success
|
5 participants
Interval 13.8 to 69.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Systemic steroids/immunos (Yes): Failure
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Success
|
16 participants
Interval 32.7 to 67.3
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Systemic steroids/immunos (No): Failure
|
16 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Neutropenic: Success
|
2 participants
Interval 13.3 to 100.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Neutropenic: Failure
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Non-neutropenic: Success
|
15 participants
Interval 33.5 to 69.9
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response for Baseline Risk Factors for Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Week 2 Follow-up
Non-neutropenic: Failure
|
14 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EIVT (up to Day 42), EOT (up to Day 42), Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: MITT. Missing or indeterminate set to Failure; CI not calculated for Failure.
Global response based on assessments of Clinical Success or Failure and Microbiological Success or Failure. Categorized as global Success if both clinical and microbiological response=success; Failure defined as all other combinations. Global response assessed as APACHE II score \<20 (less affected) or ≥20 (more severe). APACHE II assesses severity of illness in acutely ill participants; measurements computed for physiologic variables were transformed to integer score ranging 0 (normal) to 71 (more severe). Higher scores indicate more severe disease and higher risk of death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (EIVT): Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 49.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (EIVT): Failure
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (Week 2 F/U): Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 31.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (EIVT): Success
|
24 participants
Interval 53.2 to 84.0
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (EIVT): Failure
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (EOT): Success
|
25 participants
Interval 56.5 to 86.4
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (EOT): Failure
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (EOT): Success
|
1 participants
Interval 0.0 to 31.6
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (EOT): Failure
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (Week 2 F/U): Success
|
20 participants
Interval 40.7 to 73.5
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE <20 (Week 2 F/U): Failure
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants for Global Response by Acute Physiological Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
APACHE ≥20 (Week 2 F/U): Failure
|
8 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 30Population: MITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Per Survival Status (Alive or Dead) on Day 30
Alive
|
25 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per Survival Status (Alive or Dead) on Day 30
Dead
|
19 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6 Follow-upPopulation: MITT. MITT. Death for 1 participant reported twice in this study(recorded at End of Treatment and at End of Study); both instances are reported in this table under Attributal Death=No.
Death is attributable to Candidemia or Invasive Candidiasis if investigator recorded "disease under study" as cause of death. Candidemia (positive blood culture) or Invasive Cadidiasis (yeast cells in histopathological or cytopathological exam). Week 6 Follow-up visit conducted by phone.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=44 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Death Attributable (Yes or No) to Candidemia or Invasive Candidiasis
Attributable death (Yes)
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Death Attributable (Yes or No) to Candidemia or Invasive Candidiasis
Attributable death (No)
|
19 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: MITT; data not summarized using descriptive statistics.
Defined as time from first drug administratin to date of earliest recorded documentation of negative blood, specimen, or tissue culture (absence of Candidemia or Invasive Candidiasis). Candidemia (positive blood culture) or Invasive Cadidiasis (yeast cells in histopathological or cytopathological exam).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 42Population: Safety analysis set: all participants who received any dose of study medication.
Defined as time in days from first intravenous administration of Anidulafungin to the date of earliest recorded documentation of switch to oral Voriconazole treatment. Participants received at least 5 days (and a maximum of 42 days) of IV Anidulafungin; after this, they may continue treatment with oral Voriconazole for at least 14 days from the day of last positive culture up to a maximum of 42 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Duration of Exposure to Intravenous Anidulafungin Prior to Switch to Oral Voriconazole Treatment
|
10.0 days
Interval 1.0 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 6 Follow-upPopulation: MITT; data not summarized using descriptive statistics.
Defined as the number of days from date of first drug administration to date of first hospital discharge if participant was discharged to home or other location. Week 6 Follow-up visit conducted by phone.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6 Follow-upPopulation: MITT; N=number of participants evaluable for length of time in ICU.
Defined as the number of days from date of first drug administration to date of first ICU discharge. Week 6 Follow-up visit conducted by phone.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=32 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
|
16.0 Days
Interval 8.0 to 29.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population
Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure BP) measured as millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Blood Pressure
Baseline median: supine systolic BP
|
120.0 mmHg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Blood Pressure
Change from baseline: supine systolic BP
|
0.00 mmHg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Blood Pressure
Baseline median: supine diastolic BP
|
66.0 mmHg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Blood Pressure
Change from baseline: supine diastolic BP
|
0.00 mmHg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population
Supine heart rate measured as beats per minute (bpm).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Heart Rate
Baseline median: supine heart rate
|
97.5 bpm
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Supine Heart Rate
Change from baseline: supine heart rate
|
3.00 bpm
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population; N=number of participants with evaluable data.
Weight measured as kilograms (kg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=30 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight
Baseline median: weight
|
65.0 kg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight
Change from baseline: weight
|
-0.70 kg
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population
Temperature measured as degrees of Celsius (C).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Temperature
Baseline median: temperature
|
37.5 Degrees of Celsius
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Temperature
Change from baseline: temperature
|
-0.30 Degrees of Celsius
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population
Respiration rate measured as respirations per minute (resp/min).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiration Rate
Baseline median: respiration rate
|
20.0 resp/min
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Respiration Rate
Change from baseline: respiration rate
|
-0.50 resp/min
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population; N=number of participants with analyzable laboratory data; (n)=number of subjects with data for each test at observation.
Chemistry laboratory test data measured as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=27 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: total bilirubin (n=19)
|
0.6 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: total bilirubin
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: direct bilirubin (n=19)
|
0.2 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: direct bilirubin
|
-0.1 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: indirect bilirubin (n=17)
|
0.3 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: indirect bilirubin
|
0.0 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: blood urea nitrogen (n=25)
|
37.4 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: blood urea nitrogen
|
-4.8 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: creatinine (n=27)
|
0.8 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: creatinine
|
0.0 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Baseline median: glucose (n=24)
|
99 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as mg/dL)
Change from baseline: glucose
|
-6 mg/dL
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2 Follow-upPopulation: Safety analysis population; N=number of participants with analyzable laboratory data; (n)=number of subjects with data for each test at observation.
Chemistry laboratory test data measured as international units per (IU/L).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=18 Participants
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Baseline median: alanine aminotransferase (n=16)
|
45 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Change from baseline: alanine aminotransferase
|
-5 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Baseline median: aspartate aminotransferase (n=18)
|
43 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Change from baseline: aspartate aminotransferase
|
-18 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Baseline median: lactate dehydrogenase (n=13)
|
536 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Change from baseline: lactate dehydrogenase
|
-160 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Baseline median: alkaline phosphatase (n=17)
|
114 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for baseline median.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Test Data (Measured as IU/L)
Change from baseline: alkaline phosphatase
|
26 IU/L
Measure of dispersion was not calculated for median change from baseline.
|
Adverse Events
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 participants at risk
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic insufficiency
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Drug ineffective
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ disorder
|
7.4%
4/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic leak
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Failure to anastomose
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Gastrointestinal stoma complication
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural fistula
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal sepsis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal wall abscess
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endocarditis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fusarium infection
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic infection
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia klebsiella
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary sepsis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
20.4%
11/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood disorder
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
3.7%
2/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
7.4%
4/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Leukaemia recurrrent
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Anuria
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
3.7%
2/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Obstructive airways disorder
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
3.7%
2/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypovolaemic shock
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lupus vasculitis
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock
|
1.9%
1/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
|
3.7%
2/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Anidulafungin-Voriconazole
n=54 participants at risk
Anidulafungin 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, then once daily 100 mg IV beginning on Day 2. Participants who complete a minimum of 5 days of IV anidulafungin could be switched to oral (PO) voriconazole (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily \[BID\] or 200 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kilograms \[kg\] and then 200 mg BID or 100 mg BID if body weight \< 40 kg thereafter.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
9.3%
5/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
7.4%
4/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
18.5%
10/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
7.4%
4/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
5.6%
3/54
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER