TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

NCT ID: NCT00543725

Last Updated: 2016-04-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

680 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC or AZT/3TC) in HIV-1 infected patients who have not yet taken any anti-HIV drugs. The following evaluations will be done: antiviral activity, immunologic changes, and viral geno-/phenotype evolution, relationship of Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/Pharmacodynamics and Medical resource utilization and treatment adherence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over the past decade, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs have been introduced sequentially for use in the clinic. Currently, patients are routinely being treated with 3 or 4 drug combinations including nucleoside/tide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and/or fusion inhibitors. New potent antiretroviral (ARV) compounds that work in people whose HIV-1 virus is resistant to available drugs are urgently needed. This is a Phase III, randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the study physician nor the patient knows the name of the study assigned medication), double-dummy, active-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness, safety, and ability to tolerate TMC278 versus efavirenz (EFV). The study will last for 104 weeks which includes a screening period of 4 weeks, a 96-week treatment period, followed by a 4 week follow-up period. Patients will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to TMC278 or to efavirenz in combination with two other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The hypothesis to be provided in this study is that the investigational drug TMC278 will perform just like efavirenz (EFV) in terms of antiviral effectiveness (i.e., suppressing of the plasma viral load to a level \< 50 HIV-1 RNA (ribonucleic acid) copies/mL, in ARV-naïve HIV-infected patients. During the trial, patients' health will be monitored by physical examination, interview to assess health and well being, and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Experimental Group: One tablet of TMC278 25 mg daily; plus efavirenz (EFV) placebo; plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; Control Group: One tablet of Placebo daily that looks just like TMC278 plus EFV 600 mg daily plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors for 104 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections HIV-1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

002

efavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

efavirenz

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

001

TMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMC278

Intervention Type DRUG

25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TMC278

25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

efavirenz

600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
* Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
* Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is \> 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
* Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
* Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
* Patient is HLA-B\*5701 negative in case abacavir is included in the patient's treatment regimen.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
* Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
* Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
* Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
* Active TB
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to study or background ARTs
* Specific grade 3 or 4 toxicity
* Kidney impairment: calculated creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Atlantis, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Prahran, , Australia

Site Status

Surry Hills, , Australia

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina, , Brazil

Site Status

Pinheiros, , Brazil

Site Status

Recife, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Providencia, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

San José, , Costa Rica

Site Status

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Chennai, , India

Site Status

Nagpur, , India

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Voronezh, , Russia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Dundee, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Westdene Johannesburg Gauteng, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Elche, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Chile China Costa Rica France Germany India Mexico Panama Portugal Puerto Rico Russia South Africa Spain Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rimsky L, Van Eygen V, Hoogstoel A, Stevens M, Boven K, Picchio G, Vingerhoets J. 96-Week resistance analyses of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults from the ECHO and THRIVE Phase III trials. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(8):967-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2636. Epub 2013 May 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23714781 (View on PubMed)

Nelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, Li T, Tebas P, Stevens M, Buelens A, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks130. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22532465 (View on PubMed)

Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21763935 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMC278-TIDP6-C215

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR002704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00614692

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.