Evaluation of M118 in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (EMINENCE)

NCT ID: NCT00543400

Last Updated: 2019-10-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

503 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using M118 as an anticoagulant in the target population of subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effect of M118 on procedural indices including procedure success, abrupt closure, post-procedure TIMI flow, and catheter thrombus.

Substudy Primary Objective The primary objective of the substudy is to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of M118 among subjects with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

70 U/kg of unfractionated heparin given IV

Venous injection (IV) of 70 units per kilogram (U/kg) of unfractionated heparin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. If procedure lasts longer than 30 minutes a 1/2 rebolus of the original therapy will be given.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unfractionated Heparin

Intervention Type DRUG

IV infusion

50 IU/KG of M118

Venous injection of 50 international units per kilogram (IU/kg) of M118 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. If procedure lasts longer than 30 minutes a 1/2 rebolus of the original therapy will be given.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

M118

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous (IV) infusion

75 IU/KG of M118

Venous injection of 75 IU/kg of M118 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. If procedure lasts longer than 30 minutes a 1/2 rebolus of the original therapy will be given.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

M118

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous (IV) infusion

100 IU/KG of M118

Venous injection of 100 IU/kg of M118 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. If procedure lasts longer than 30 minutes a 1/2 rebolus of the original therapy will be given.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

M118

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous (IV) infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

M118

intravenous (IV) infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Unfractionated Heparin

IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 19 years
* Ability to give informed consent
* Documented stable CAD with a significant lesion in a native coronary artery amenable to PCI with one stent
* Planned single vessel intervention

Exclusion Criteria

* Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the prior 7 days
* Target lesion is a chronic total occlusion (present for longer than 3 months)
* Target lesion with angiographically visible thrombus or in-stent thrombosis
* Target lesion is in a bypass graft
* Planned use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or planned use of atherectomy including directional, rotational, or laser
* Known allergies or sensitivities to heparin, pork, or pork-containing products
* History of HIT
* Hemodynamic instability
* Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the prior 3 months
* Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis
* Trauma or major surgery in the preceding month or planned surgery or PCI within the 30 days after the index PCI
* Suspected aortic dissection
* Receiving oral anticoagulation therapy
* Receipt of LMWH or of UFH (except for that used during the diagnostic portion of the index procedure) within the prior 7 days
* ACT \> 200 prior to study drug administration
* Severe, untreated hypertension at the time of the index PCI procedure (systolic blood pressure of \> 180 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mm Hg)
* Hemoglobin level of less than 10.0 g/dl or a hematocrit below 30%
* Platelet count of less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter or more than 600,000 per cubic millimeter
* Creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min
* Any malignancy within the prior 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers
* Prior enrollment in EMINENCE trial or currently receiving other experimental therapy
* Pregnant or lactating if subject is female

Substudy:

Inclusion:

* Ability to give informed consent
* Participation in the main study protocol

Exclusion:

-Inability to provide the blood specimens required by the substudy protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sunil Rao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Clinical Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center, Medstar Research Institute

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Jim Moran Heart & Vascular Research Institute

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center (UFL)

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cardiology Research Associates

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Suncoast Cardiovascular Research

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Advocate Good Shephard Hospital

Barrington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Trinity Medical Center

Rock Island, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky-Gill Heart Institute

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Health System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital Heart & Vascular Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Genesys Regional Medical Center

Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Mary's Duluth Clinic Health Center

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint-Luke's Hospital / Mid America Heart Institute

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis University Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

UNC Health Systems

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Riverside Methodist Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Genesis Health Care System

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Allegheny Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Black Hills Clinical Research Center

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Centennial Heart Cardiovascular Consultants

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Northwest Texas Healthcare System_Amarillo Heart Clinical Research Institute, Inc.

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Heart, P.A.

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Victoria Heart & Vascular Center

Victoria, Texas, United States

Site Status

Providence Health Center

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

UVA Cardiology, UVA Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

McGuire VA Medical Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cardiology Care

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Alberta Hospital, WMC

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital: Interventional Research

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Melloni C, Fier I, Roach J, Kosinski AS, Broderick S, Sigmon K, Myles S, Becker RC, Rao SV; EMINENCE Investigators. Design and rationale of the Evaluation of M118 IN pErcutaNeous Coronary intErvention (EMINENCE) trial. Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.020. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19853689 (View on PubMed)

Rao SV, Melloni C, Myles-Dimauro S, Broderick S, Kosinski AS, Kleiman NS, Dzavik V, Tanguay JF, Chandna H, Gammon R, Rivera E, Alexander JH, Fier I, Roach J, Becker RC; EMINENCE Investigators. Evaluation of a new heparin agent in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the phase 2 evaluation of M118 IN pErcutaNeous Coronary intErvention (EMINENCE) Trial. Circulation. 2010 Apr 20;121(15):1713-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.913277. Epub 2010 Apr 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20368520 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MOM-M118-006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of VentriGel in Post-MI Patients
NCT02305602 COMPLETED PHASE1
Antithrombotic Regimens and Outcome
NCT00448461 COMPLETED PHASE4
Morphine In Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT01186445 COMPLETED PHASE3