Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Common Sage in Controlling Hot Flashes in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Androgen Deprivation
NCT ID: NCT00541788
Last Updated: 2010-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Once the informed consent is signed, the patient receives the study diary to note the daily frequency and severity of hot flashes and their effect on daily quality of life. The severity of the hot flashes is measured by the Moyad scoring scale. The effect on daily quality of life is measured using the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS). The patient will be instructed in detail how to use the diary.
After week 1, the patient returns the diary to the responsible physician. In return the patient receives the study medication (Common Sage, product) and a diary for the next week (=week 2). This procedure will be repeated until the end of the observation period (2 months after enrollment in the study). The common Sage will be provided in tablets. The suggested dose of Common Sage is 3 tablets a day (morning - noon - evening).
To be sure that the effect of Common Sage is NOT due to an inhibition of the effect of the LHRH analogue, the related hormones (testosterone, FSH, LH, free testosterone and SHBG) will be tested at three fixed moments: day of study enrollment, 1 month after study enrollment and at the end of the study. In order to check the level of hemoglobin and cholesterol, every 2 weeks a blood count will be performed. It has been shown that LHRH analogues can induce anemia and hypercholesterolemia. The investigators want to measure a possible effect of Common Sage on both.
There are no known side-effects of the use of Common Sage. All symptoms that could be related to the use of Common Sage will be recorded in detail. Therefore, a clinical examination including blood pressure registration will be performed by the responsible physician on a weekly base.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Administration of Common Sage
Administration of Common Sage
Administration of Common Sage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Administration of Common Sage
Administration of Common Sage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Karnofsky performance status ≥70%
* Age ≥18 years
* Informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
* Patient unlikely to comply with protocol, i.e. uncooperative attitude, inability to complete the diary, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Farmafyt
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University Hospital Ghent
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gert De Meerleer, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Ghent
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Website University Hospital Ghent
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007/285
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id