Efficacy and Safety Study of Naproxcinod in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Hip

NCT ID: NCT00541489

Last Updated: 2009-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To study the efficacy and safety of Naproxcinod vs. Placebo and Naproxen in the treatment of signs and symptoms of Osteoarthritis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a 13 week randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study comparing efficacy and safety of Naproxcinod, Placebo and Naproxen.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

bid

2

Naproxen 500 mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Naproxen

Intervention Type DRUG

500 mg, bid

3

Naproxcinod 750 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naproxcinod

Intervention Type DRUG

750 mg, bid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naproxcinod

750 mg, bid

Intervention Type DRUG

Naproxen

500 mg, bid

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

bid

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women (40 or older) with a diagnosis of primary OA of the hip
* Must be a current chronic user of NSAIDS or acetaminophen
* Must discontinue all analgesic therapy at Screening

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled Hypertension or Diabetes
* Hepatic or renal impairment
* Current or expected use of anticoagulant
* Clinically relevant abnormal ECG
* A history of alcohol or drug abuse
* Diagnosis of gastric or duodenal ulceration and/or history of significant gastro-duodenal bleeding, within the last 6 months
* Current medical disease, including arthritic, that could confound or interfere with the evaluation of efficacy
* Candidates for imminent joint replacement
* Participation within 30 days prior to screening in another investigational study
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NicOx

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fair Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Northglenn, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Meyers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Peabody, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Dover, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bethany, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Penndel, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Nederland, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Corunna, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baerwald C, Verdecchia P, Duquesroix B, Frayssinet H, Ferreira T. Efficacy, safety, and effects on blood pressure of naproxcinod 750 mg twice daily compared with placebo and naproxen 500 mg twice daily in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;62(12):3635-44. doi: 10.1002/art.27694.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20722026 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.nicox.com

Click here to learn more about this study - Efficacy and Safety Study of Naproxcinod in Subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HCT3012-X-303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.