Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pregabalin Versus Levetiracetam In Partial Seizures (NCT NCT00537238)
NCT ID: NCT00537238
Last Updated: 2021-01-28
Results Overview
Participants who had at least 50% reduction in 28-day seizure rate from baseline to the end of the maintenance phase were considered as responders. The 28-day seizure rate was calculated as number of partial seizures in the period divided by difference of number of days in the period and number of missing diary day entries in the period, multiplied by 28.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
509 participants
Baseline up to Week 16
2021-01-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pregabalin
Pregabalin 75 milligram (mg) capsule orally twice daily (BID) for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the titration phase (TP). If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: at least \[\>=\] 50% reduction in seizures), pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week maintenance phase(MP). Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during TP and MP. After MP, participants were allowed to progress into optional (opt) blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from MP for a maximum of 2 years or until last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
254
|
255
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Titration Phase
|
226
|
236
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Maintenance Phase
|
208
|
210
|
|
Overall Study
Entered Opt Blinded Continuation Phase
|
185
|
195
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
80
|
82
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
174
|
173
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pregabalin
Pregabalin 75 milligram (mg) capsule orally twice daily (BID) for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the titration phase (TP). If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: at least \[\>=\] 50% reduction in seizures), pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week maintenance phase(MP). Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during TP and MP. After MP, participants were allowed to progress into optional (opt) blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from MP for a maximum of 2 years or until last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
31
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
20
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
12
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
51
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
15
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Does not meet entrance criteria
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
44
|
52
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pregabalin Versus Levetiracetam In Partial Seizures
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=254 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=255 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Total
n=509 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=7 Participants
|
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
245 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: Per protocol population included all randomized participants who had at least 28 days of study drug during the maintenance phase and a minimum of 28 days of utilizable seizure diary data during baseline and maintenance phases of the study and had no major protocol violation.
Participants who had at least 50% reduction in 28-day seizure rate from baseline to the end of the maintenance phase were considered as responders. The 28-day seizure rate was calculated as number of partial seizures in the period divided by difference of number of days in the period and number of missing diary day entries in the period, multiplied by 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=164 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=177 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Response to Treatment
|
0.59 proportion of participants
|
0.59 proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation.
The seizures were recorded by the participants, by a family member, by a caregiver, or by a legal guardian and documented in a daily seizure diary. Participant's 28-day seizure frequency of all partial seizure was assessed during double blind (TP + MP) phase compared with baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=253 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=254 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in 28 Day Seizure Frequency at Week 16
|
-53.93 percent change
Interval -100.0 to 533.1
|
-57.28 percent change
Interval -100.0 to 276.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: SGTC population included all participants who had at least 1 SGTC seizure during either baseline or double-blind phase. n=number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Change was calculated as (proportion of SGTC seizure rate divided by all partial seizure rates during double blind phase) minus (proportion of SGTC seizure rate divided by all partial seizure rates at baseline). Negative values indicated reductions in seizures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=107 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=111 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Proportion of 28-day Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic (SGTC) Seizure Rate to 28-day All Partial Seizure Rate at Week 16
Baseline (n=107, 111)
|
39.41 percentage of all partial seizure/28days
Standard Deviation 38.141
|
38.94 percentage of all partial seizure/28days
Standard Deviation 35.870
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Proportion of 28-day Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic (SGTC) Seizure Rate to 28-day All Partial Seizure Rate at Week 16
Change at Week 16 (n=102, 101)
|
3.93 percentage of all partial seizure/28days
Standard Deviation 30.158
|
6.33 percentage of all partial seizure/28days
Standard Deviation 32.071
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation. N (number of participants analyzed)=participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Seizure free for 28 days was defined as participants who have not experienced any seizure (simple partial, complex partial and SGTC) for at least 28 consecutive days from their last seizure until the end of the maintenance phase. Same participant could be seizure free for a specific type of seizure but not necessarily for the other types of seizure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=201 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=210 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Seizures
All Partial Seizure
|
19.9 percentage of participants
Interval 14.4 to 25.4
|
27.6 percentage of participants
Interval 21.6 to 33.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Seizures
Simple Partial Seizure
|
65.7 percentage of participants
Interval 59.1 to 72.2
|
66.2 percentage of participants
Interval 59.8 to 72.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Seizures
Complex Partial Seizure
|
49.3 percentage of participants
Interval 42.3 to 56.2
|
59.0 percentage of participants
Interval 52.4 to 65.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Without Seizures
SGTC Seizure
|
80.6 percentage of participants
Interval 75.1 to 86.1
|
79.0 percentage of participants
Interval 73.5 to 84.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up (Day 7 of taper phase)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation. n=number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
BPRS-A:18-item clinician rated scale assesses somatic concern,anxiety, emotional withdrawal,conceptual disorganization,hallucinatory behavior(HB), guilt feelings,suspiciousness,disorientation,tension,mannerisms and posturing,grandiosity,depressive mood,hostility,motor retardation,uncooperativeness,unusual thought content,blunted affect,excitement. Items rated on 7-point scale 1 (not reported) to 7 (very severe). Total score=sum of items(range 18-126), core score=sum of conceptual disorganization, suspiciousness, HB, unusual thought content(range 4-28). Higher total/core score=more impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=253 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=254 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Baseline: Total BPRS-A Score (n=253, 254)
|
27.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
26.09 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Baseline: Core BPRS-A Score (n=253, 254)
|
5.18 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
5.01 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 7: Total BPRS-A Score (n=217, 225)
|
-2.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 7: Core BPRS-A Score (n=216, 225)
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 10: Total BPRS-A Score (n=217, 219)
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 10: Core BPRS-A Score (n=217, 219)
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 13: Total BPRS-A Score (n=209, 214)
|
-2.99 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
-2.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 13: Core BPRS-A Score (n=209, 214)
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 16: Total BPRS-A Score (n=235, 241)
|
-2.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Week 16: Core BPRS-A Score (n=235, 241)
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Follow-up: Total BPRS-A Score(n=178,189)
|
-2.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Anchored (BPRS-A) Total and Core Score at Week 7, 10, 13, 16 and Follow-up
Change at Follow-up: Core BPRS-A Score(n=178,189)
|
-0.37 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
-0.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation. N (number of participants analyzed)=participants who were evaluable for this measure. n=number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=253 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=253 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Baseline: HADS-A (n=253, 253)
|
7.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
7.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Baseline: HADS-D (n=253, 253)
|
6.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 16: HADS-A (n=228, 241)
|
6.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
6.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 16: HADS-D (n=228, 241)
|
5.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
5.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation. n=number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales:sleep disturbance,snoring,awakened short of breath,sleep adequacy,somnolence (range:0-100);sleep quantity (range:0-24),optimal sleep(yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores:sleep problem summary,overall sleep problem. Except adequacy,optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed (actual raw score\[RS\] minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100;higher score=more intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=253 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=254 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Sleep Disturbance (n=253, 253)
|
27.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
28.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Snoring (n=253, 254)
|
30.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
32.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.29
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Awaken Short of Breath (n=253, 254)
|
15.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.54
|
17.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Quantity of Sleep (n=252, 252)
|
7.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
7.82 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Adequacy of Sleep (n=253, 254)
|
62.96 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.79
|
64.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.83
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Somnolence (n=253, 254)
|
34.85 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
33.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline: Sleep Problem Index (9) (n=253, 253)
|
29.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
29.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Sleep Disturbance (n=230, 241)
|
21.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
23.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.17
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Snoring (n=230, 240)
|
33.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.72
|
23.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Awaken Short of Breath (n=230, 241)
|
15.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
14.27 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Quantity of Sleep (n=230, 241)
|
7.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
7.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Adequacy of Sleep (n=230, 241)
|
63.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.72
|
66.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Somnolence (n=230, 241)
|
31.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
32.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16: Sleep Problem Index (9) (n=230, 241)
|
26.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
26.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 blinded dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline and post baseline primary efficacy evaluation. N (number of participants analyzed)=participants who were evaluable for this measure. n=number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Percentage of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=252 Participants
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=252 Participants
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Baseline (n=252, 252)
|
56.0 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) Score
Week 16 (n=230, 241)
|
58.3 percentage of participants
|
50.2 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Pregabalin
Levetiracetam
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=254 participants at risk
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=255 participants at risk
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain contusion
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burns third degree
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Clavicle fracture
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral injury
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intentional overdose
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.79%
2/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Costochondritis
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroduodenitis
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Drowning
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Polyp
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator cuff syndrome
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal disorder
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Retroperitoneal cancer
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Complex partial seizures
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
2.0%
5/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Drug withdrawal convulsions
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.78%
2/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Postictal state
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.78%
2/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion threatened
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.78%
2/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Personality change
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Personality disorder
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Somatoform disorder neurologic
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.78%
2/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.39%
1/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.39%
1/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pregabalin
n=254 participants at risk
Pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally BID for 1 Week followed by pregabalin 150 mg orally BID up to Week 4 in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>=50% reduction in seizures), the pregabalin dose was escalated to 225 mg orally BID for Week 2 through 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with pregabalin 150 mg or 225 mg orally BID dose in TP, continued same dose during the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received pregabalin 300 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to levetiracetam capsule orally BID along with pregabalin during the TP and the MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
Levetiracetam
n=255 participants at risk
Levetiracetam 500 mg capsule orally BID for 2 Weeks in the TP. If seizure control was inadequate (adequate: \>= 50% reduction in seizures), the levetiracetam dose was escalated to 1000 mg orally BID for Week 2 through Week 4. Participants who had adequate seizure control with levetiracetam 500 or 1000 mg orally BID dose in the TP, continued same dose in the 12-week MP. Participants who had inadequate seizure control, received levetiracetam 1500 mg orally BID during the MP. Participants also received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally BID along with levetiracetam during TP and MP. After the MP, participants were allowed to progress into the opt blinded continuation phase, and remained on the dose from the MP for a maximum of 2 years or until the last participant either completed or discontinued from the MP. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.0%
5/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.9%
15/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.4%
24/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.5%
19/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
10.2%
26/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
8/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
23.2%
59/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.5%
42/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
14.6%
37/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.8%
30/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
32.7%
83/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
29.8%
76/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.0%
5/254
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.9%
15/255
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER