Trial Outcomes & Findings for EXecutive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE V® in a Multi Vessel Disease (NCT NCT00531011)
NCT ID: NCT00531011
Last Updated: 2015-06-08
Results Overview
Full Analysis Set (FAS). LL is defined as the difference between the post-procedure (immediately post placement of the stent) minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the follow-up MLD (at 270 days). In stent is measured within the confines of the stent edges.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
200 participants
at 270 days
2015-06-08
Participant Flow
The patient population was comprised of male and female patients derived from the general interventional cardiology population from 9 centers in Italy.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
XIENCE V
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
103
|
97
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
99
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
XIENCE V
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
EXecutive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE V® in a Multi Vessel Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=7 Participants
|
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
97 participants
n=7 Participants
|
200 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at 270 daysPopulation: Descriptive statistics for this measure are based on one random lesion per patient, 167 patients performed angiographic follow-up.
Full Analysis Set (FAS). LL is defined as the difference between the post-procedure (immediately post placement of the stent) minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the follow-up MLD (at 270 days). In stent is measured within the confines of the stent edges.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-stent Late Loss (LL)
|
0.052 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.513
|
0.238 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.504
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 monthsPopulation: ITT, 167 patients performed angiographic follow-up.
This measures the percentage of patients who have \> 50% diameter stenosis of the assessed vessel, within the stent edges.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-stent Binary Restenosis Rate
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 monthsPopulation: 167 patients performed angiographic follow-up.
This measures the percentage of patients who have \> 50% diameter stenosis of the assessed vessel, within the stent edges In-segment is measured within the confines of the stent edges plus within 5 mm on either side of the stent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-segment Binary Restenosis Rate
|
6.2 percentage of participants
|
4.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 monthsPopulation: 167 patients performed angiographic follow-up. Descriptive statistics for this measure are based on one random lesion per patient.
LL is defined as the difference between the post-procedure (immediately post placement of the stent) minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the follow-up MLD (at 270 days). In segment LL is measured within the confines of the stent edges and within 5 mm of those edges.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-segment Late Loss (LL)
|
-0.100 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.484
|
0.037 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.421
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 30 daysPopulation: ITT
This measure is a calculation of the percentage of participants who experience any of the components of this composite measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Rate of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI, Both Q-wave and Non Q-wave), and Ischemia-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) .
|
1 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 30 daysPopulation: ITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Rate of All Death, MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave), and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR).
|
1 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at the time of PCIPopulation: Intent to treat (ITT)
defined as attainment of \< 30% residual in-stent stenosis (by visual assessment) using any percutaneous method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=259 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=234 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lesion Success
|
99.2 Percentage of participants
|
99.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at the time of PCIdefined as: residual in-stent %DS of \< 30% using a percutaneous method, without cardiac death, Q-wave MI, non Q-wave MI, or repeat revasc of the target during hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=259 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=234 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Success
|
98.1 percentage of participants
|
97 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at the time of PCIdefined as achievement of a final residual in-stent diameter stenosis of \< 30% (visual assessment) using the assigned device only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=256 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=224 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Device Success
|
97.7 percentage of participants
|
98.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 30 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adjudicated Stent Thrombosis.
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adjudicated Stent Thrombosis.
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 30 daysPopulation: ITT
(TLR/TVR/any revascularization)both ischemia-driven and not ischemia-driven.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Revascularizations
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT
(TLR/TVR/any revascularization)both ischemia-driven and not ischemia-driven.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Revascularizations
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
11.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT
ITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Endpoint of Cardiac Death, MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave), and Ischemia-driven TLR .
|
4.9 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=103 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=97 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Endpoint of All Death, MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave), and TVR.
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
12.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 months.Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-stent Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD).
|
2.29 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
2.17 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 months.Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-segment Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD).
|
2.10 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
2.04 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 months.Proximal refers to the immediate 5 mm outside of the proximal end of the stent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=90 Participants
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proximal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD).
|
2.67 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
2.61 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 9 months.Distal refers to the immediate 5 mm outside of the distal end of the stent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=225 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=194 Lesions
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Distal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD).
|
2.28 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
2.25 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
Adverse Events
XIENCE V
TAXUS® Liberté™
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
XIENCE V
n=101 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS)
|
TAXUS® Liberté™
n=91 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive the TAXUS® Liberté™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac death
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
0.00%
0/91 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery dissection
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
6.6%
6/91 • Number of events 6 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
3.3%
3/91 • Number of events 3 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
0.00%
0/91 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
General disorders
Thrombosis in device
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
0.00%
0/91 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent coronary artery restenosis
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
11.0%
10/91 • Number of events 11 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medical device complication
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
2.2%
2/91 • Number of events 2 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
General disorders
Procedural complications
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
0.00%
0/91 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Investigations
Arteriogram coronary
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Ischaemia NOS
|
0.00%
0/101 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
1.1%
1/91 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
Only serious adverse events were collected in the conduct of this trial. "Other" adverse events were not collected.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The publication of the aggregate data is subject to the prior agreement of all the various sites participating in the study. Publication of the clinical data collected during the Study, can be only after notifying the SPONSOR in advance in order to allow the SPONSOR to verify compliance with confidentiality obligations and intellectual property rights of the SPONSOR.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER