A Randomized Phase IIb Placebo-Controlled Study of R-ICE Chemotherapy With and Without SGN-40 for Patients With DLBCL

NCT ID: NCT00529503

Last Updated: 2015-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

151 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized trial to estimate the activity of R-ICE plus SGN-40 vs. R-ICE plus placebo in patients with DLBCL. The study will assess safety and tolerability and will measure any additional clinical benefit observed in patients receiving SGN-40.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

SGN-40, rituximab, etoposide, carboplatin, ifosfamide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SGN-40

Intervention Type DRUG

2-8 mg/kg IV. Cycle 1: Days -1, 3, 8, 15; Cycles 2, 3: Days 1, 8, 15.

rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 IV. Cycle 1: Day -2; Cycles 2, 3: Day 1

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg/m2 IV. Cycles 1-3: Days 1, 2 and 3.

carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

AUC=5 mg/mL min IV. Cycles 1-3: Day 2.

ifosfamide

Intervention Type DRUG

5 g/m2 24 hr. IV infusion. Cycles 1-3: Day2.

2

placebo, rituximab, etoposide, carboplatin, ifosfamide

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Volume as equivalent to corresponding SGN 40 dose IV. Cycle 1: Days -1, 3, 8, 15. Cycles 2, 3: Days 1, 8, 15.

rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 IV. Cycle 1: Day -2; Cycles 2, 3: Day 1

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg/m2 IV. Cycles 1-3: Days 1, 2 and 3.

carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

AUC=5 mg/mL min IV. Cycles 1-3: Day 2.

ifosfamide

Intervention Type DRUG

5 g/m2 24 hr. IV infusion. Cycles 1-3: Day2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SGN-40

2-8 mg/kg IV. Cycle 1: Days -1, 3, 8, 15; Cycles 2, 3: Days 1, 8, 15.

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Volume as equivalent to corresponding SGN 40 dose IV. Cycle 1: Days -1, 3, 8, 15. Cycles 2, 3: Days 1, 8, 15.

Intervention Type DRUG

rituximab

375 mg/m2 IV. Cycle 1: Day -2; Cycles 2, 3: Day 1

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

100 mg/m2 IV. Cycles 1-3: Days 1, 2 and 3.

Intervention Type DRUG

carboplatin

AUC=5 mg/mL min IV. Cycles 1-3: Day 2.

Intervention Type DRUG

ifosfamide

5 g/m2 24 hr. IV infusion. Cycles 1-3: Day2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

dacetuzumab Rituxan Toposar, Vepesid Paraplatin Ifex

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of de novo or transformed DLBCL, or follicular grade 3b lymphoma.
* Received at least four cycles of first-line therapy with R-CHOP, or equivalent.
* Best clinical response to first-line therapy of stable disease, partial response, or complete response.
* At least one measureable lesion that is both greater than or equal to 1.5cm by radiographic imaging and by positive FDG-PET scan.

Exclusion Criteria

* Leptomeningeal or central nervous system lymphoma.
* Received any therapy for relapsed or progressive disease except for local radiation, steroids, or rituximab.
* Received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genentech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seagen Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan Drachman, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Seagen Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of California at Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Christiana Care Health Systems

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Georgetown University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville - James Graham Brown Cancer Center

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Sparrow Regional Cancer Center

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Park Nicollet Institute

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

San Juan Oncology Associates

Farmington, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Providence Portland Medical Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor Sammons Cancer Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

MultiCare Health System

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent's Hospital - Sydney

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Gosford & Wyong Hospital

Gosford, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Royal North Shore Hospital

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Royal Perth Hospital

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Universite de Gent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Augustinus

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Goddine

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice v Motole

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Andre Mignot

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Centre Leon Berard - Centre regional de lutte contre le cancer Rhone-Alpes

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hopital Hotel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Groupe Hospitalier Necker - Enfants Malades

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopitaux du Haut Leveque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Centre Henri Becquerel

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Hematologie CHU Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave-Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Johannes-Gutenberg Universitat Mainz

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

KH Maria Hilf-Franziskushaus

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Debreceni Egyetem Orvos - es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz, IInd Department of Internal Medicine

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikat Kozpont

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Szpital Akademii Medycznej w Gdansku

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. M. Kopernika w Lodzi

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologii

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Centrum Onkologii Institut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Hospital Clinic i Provincial

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Paul

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

H. Duran y Reynals Institue Catala D'Oncologia

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Czechia France Germany Hungary Italy Poland Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fayad L, Ansell SM, Advani R, Coiffier B, Stuart R, Bartlett NL, Forero-Torres A, Kuliczkowski K, Belada D, Ng E, Drachman JG. Dacetuzumab plus rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide as salvage therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(9):2569-78. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1007504. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25651427 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SG040-0005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reduced Chemotherapy in Low Risk DLBCL
NCT02752815 UNKNOWN PHASE4
RICE-ibrutinib in Relapsed DLBCL
NCT02955628 UNKNOWN PHASE2