Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide Monotherapy for Partial-onset Seizures (NCT NCT00520741)

NCT ID: NCT00520741

Last Updated: 2018-07-19

Results Overview

Pre-defined exit criteria: 1. A 2-fold or greater increase in average monthly (28-day) partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) compared to average monthly partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) during the Baseline Phase 2. A 2-fold or greater increase in consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) versus the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) that occurred during the Baseline Phase. Note: if the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency during the Baseline Phase is 1, a 2-day partial seizure frequency of ≥3 is required to meet this exit criterion 3. Occurrence of a single generalized tonic-clonic seizure if none had occurred in the 6 months prior to randomization 4. A prolongation or worsening of overall seizure duration, frequency, type or pattern considered by the investigator as serious enough to warrant trial discontinuation 5. Status epilepticus, or new onset of serial/cluster seizures

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

426 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days)

Results posted on

2018-07-19

Participant Flow

The study was conducted at 160 sites in the United States of America (USA), Canada, Europe, and Australia.The maximum duration of a subject's trial participation is 30 weeks. The Participant Flow refers to the Safety Set (SS) population which consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication.

Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Overall Study
STARTED
106
319
Overall Study
COMPLETED
69
194
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
37
125

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
16
56
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
11
30
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
11
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
15
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory compliance of subject
4
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
4
Overall Study
Other reasons for premature termination
0
6

Baseline Characteristics

Trial to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide Monotherapy for Partial-onset Seizures

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=106 Participants
Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=319 Participants
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Total
n=425 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
303 Participants
n=7 Participants
402 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=5 Participants
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=7 Participants
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
169 Participants
n=7 Participants
219 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
150 Participants
n=7 Participants
206 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
91 participants
n=5 Participants
246 participants
n=7 Participants
337 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
9 participants
n=5 Participants
53 participants
n=7 Participants
62 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants
n=5 Participants
19 participants
n=7 Participants
25 participants
n=5 Participants
Height
169.72 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69 • n=5 Participants
169.01 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87 • n=7 Participants
169.19 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82 • n=5 Participants
Weight
81.62 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.53 • n=5 Participants
82.13 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.30 • n=7 Participants
82.00 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.85 • n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
28.22 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74 • n=5 Participants
28.67 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.64 • n=7 Participants
28.56 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.42 • n=5 Participants
Average Baseline Seizure Frequency per 28 days
10.10 seizures/28 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82 • n=5 Participants
10.22 seizures/28 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 • n=7 Participants
10.19 seizures/28 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.86 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (ie, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication). The primary analysis is only conducted on the Lacosamide 400 mg/day group.

Pre-defined exit criteria: 1. A 2-fold or greater increase in average monthly (28-day) partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) compared to average monthly partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) during the Baseline Phase 2. A 2-fold or greater increase in consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) versus the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency (motor and non-motor) that occurred during the Baseline Phase. Note: if the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency during the Baseline Phase is 1, a 2-day partial seizure frequency of ≥3 is required to meet this exit criterion 3. Occurrence of a single generalized tonic-clonic seizure if none had occurred in the 6 months prior to randomization 4. A prolongation or worsening of overall seizure duration, frequency, type or pattern considered by the investigator as serious enough to warrant trial discontinuation 5. Status epilepticus, or new onset of serial/cluster seizures

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=284 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified As Meeting At Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria By Day 112 Relative To The Start of Withdrawal of Background Antiepileptic Drug(s)
30.0 percentage of subjects

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs). In addition to being a member of FAS, subjects also met at least one of the exit criterion noted under the Primary Outcome Measure.

The time to first occurrence (days) of any exit event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and was based on the time from the start of the Maintenance Phase to the earliest date a subject met an exit criterion. Subjects who discontinued during the Maintenance Phase due to non-exit criteria reasons or who completed the Maintenance Phase before 112 days and did not meet an exit criterion were censored as of the last Maintenance Phase dose date. Subjects completing 112 days in the Maintenance Phase were censored as of Day 112.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=26 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=82 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Time to First Occurrence of Any Exit Event During The Maintenance Period
39 days
Full Range 21.2 • Interval 1.0 to 80.0
45.0 days
Full Range 24.3 • Interval 3.0 to 102.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication).

Subjects were classified as having an exit event if they experienced at least 1 of the following events during the Maintenance Phase as of Day 112: 1. Met at least 1 exit criterion based on the calculations applied for the Primary Efficacy Analysis 2. Withdrawal due to AE with onset during the Maintenance Phase 3. Withdrew prematurely due to lack of efficacy during the Maintenance Phase The date the subject experienced the event was set to the earliest date the subject met an exit criterion or the date of the last Maintenance Phase dose for subjects not meeting an exit criterion but withdrawing due to an AE or lack of efficacy. The secondary analysis is only conducted on the Lacosamide 400 mg/day group.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=284 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified as Meeting at Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria by Day 112, Withdrew Due to Adverse Event (AE) or Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During The Maintenance Period
32.3 percentage of subjects

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Visit 9 - Visit 12 (approximately 10 weeks)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs).This subset of the FAS included subjects who entered the Maintenance Phase but who never achieved Lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy.

Days on Monotherapy Treatment were defined as the number of days during the Monotherapy Phase when the subject took Lacosamide (LCM) only (ie, the total number of days exposed to LCM during the Monotherapy Phase minus any days where a concomitant or rescue Anti-epileptic Drug (AED) was taken by the subject). The days on Monotherapy Treatment did not need to be consecutive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=86 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=254 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Duration of Monotherapy Treatment During the Monotherapy Phase of The Maintenance Period (Visit 9 - Visit 12)
71 days
Full Range 22.0 • Interval 1.0 to 100.0
71 days
Full Range 20.3 • Interval 2.0 to 105.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication).

For the assessment of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the investigator should provide his/her assessment of the subject's clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status. He was asked the following:Please check the number that best describes the subject's condition over the past 4 weeks compared to Baseline: 1. Very much improved 2. Much improved 3. Minimally improved 4. No change 5. Minimally worse 6. Much worse 7. Very much worse

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=99 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=284 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Very much improved
21 participants
56 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Much improved
33 participants
116 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Minimally improved
18 participants
42 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
No change
8 participants
18 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Minimally worse
6 participants
16 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Much worse
8 participants
23 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Very much worse
1 participants
1 participants
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Not done
4 participants
12 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks)

Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication).

For the assessment of the Patient's Global Impression of Change, the subject should provide his/her assessment of his/her own clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status.The subject was asked to answer the following: Over the past 4 weeks, how have you felt compared to before you entered this clinical trial? (Please check the number that best describes your condition.) 1. Very much improved 2. Much improved 3. Minimally improved 4. No change 5. Minimally worse 6. Much worse 7. Very much worse

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=99 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=284 Participants
Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300 mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3:1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure.
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Very much improved
24 participants
81 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Much improved
33 participants
93 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Minimally improved
15 participants
37 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
No change
10 participants
15 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Minimally worse
3 participants
19 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Much worse
7 participants
22 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Very much worse
3 participants
3 participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit
Not done
4 participants
14 participants

Adverse Events

Lacosamide 300 mg/Day

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 74 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Lacosamide 400 mg/Day

Serious events: 21 serious events
Other events: 215 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=106 participants at risk
Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=319 participants at risk
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Endocrine disorders
Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Glossitis
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
General disorders
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.63%
2/319 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Polytraumatism
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.00%
0/319 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
1.9%
6/319 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Toxic induced encephalopathy
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal behaviour
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Conversion disorder
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.00%
0/319 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, auditory
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.00%
0/319 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, visual
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.00%
0/319 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.00%
0/319 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory acidosis
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
0.00%
0/106 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
0.31%
1/319 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Lacosamide 300 mg/Day
n=106 participants at risk
Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Lacosamide 400 mg/Day
n=319 participants at risk
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
5.7%
6/106 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
6.0%
19/319 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
12.3%
13/106 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
14.4%
46/319 • Number of events 57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
6.6%
7/106 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
6.6%
21/319 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
7.2%
23/319 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
General disorders
Fatigue
11.3%
12/106 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
10.0%
32/319 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
6.6%
7/106 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
8.8%
28/319 • Number of events 30 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
4.7%
5/106 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
5.0%
16/319 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
8.5%
9/106 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
3.4%
11/319 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
17.9%
19/106 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
27.0%
86/319 • Number of events 121 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
19.8%
21/106 • Number of events 32 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
14.1%
45/319 • Number of events 58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
16.0%
17/106 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
9.1%
29/319 • Number of events 36 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
14.2%
15/106 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
9.1%
29/319 • Number of events 35 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
7.5%
8/106 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
7.2%
23/319 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
6.6%
7/106 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
1.9%
6/319 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
7.5%
8/106 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
5.3%
17/319 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
6.6%
7/106 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
3.4%
11/319 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
3.8%
4/106 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
5.0%
16/319 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.

Additional Information

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

UCB

Phone: +1 877 822 9493

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60