Trial Outcomes & Findings for Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (NCT NCT00510835)

NCT ID: NCT00510835

Last Updated: 2017-01-26

Results Overview

The primary study outcome is hospital mortality (defined as the number of deaths prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first). The secondary outcomes are duration of survival (90 day and 1 year) and clinical evidence of organ dysfunction.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

1351 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first

Results posted on

2017-01-26

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Overall Study
STARTED
445
448
458
Overall Study
COMPLETED
439
446
456
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6
2
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
6
2
2

Baseline Characteristics

Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 Participants
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 Participants
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
n=456 Participants
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Total
n=1341 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 • n=5 Participants
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1 • n=7 Participants
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=5 Participants
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=4 Participants
Gender
Female
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
194 Participants
n=7 Participants
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
593 Participants
n=4 Participants
Gender
Male
232 Participants
n=5 Participants
252 Participants
n=7 Participants
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
748 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
439 participants
n=5 Participants
446 participants
n=7 Participants
456 participants
n=5 Participants
1341 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first

The primary study outcome is hospital mortality (defined as the number of deaths prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first). The secondary outcomes are duration of survival (90 day and 1 year) and clinical evidence of organ dysfunction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 Participants
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 Participants
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
n=456 Participants
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Hospital Mortality
92 Participants
81 Participants
86 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: study hour 0, 6, 24 & 72

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)

Serious events: 23 serious events
Other events: 41 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)

Serious events: 22 serious events
Other events: 49 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Usual Care

Serious events: 37 serious events
Other events: 52 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 participants at risk
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 participants at risk
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
n=456 participants at risk
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Cardiac disorders
cardiac dysfunction
1.6%
7/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.1%
5/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.5%
7/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Gastrointestinal disorders
hemorrhage/bleeding
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Hepatobiliary disorders
hepatobiliary/pancreas
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic/laboratory
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Nervous system disorders
neurology
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
General disorders
pain
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary/upper respiratory
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.1%
5/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
2.2%
10/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Renal and urinary disorders
renal/genitourinary
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Vascular disorders
vascular
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 participants at risk
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals. Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 participants at risk
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines. Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
Usual Care
n=456 participants at risk
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens. Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
Immune system disorders
allergy/immunology
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
blood/bone marrow
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.6%
7/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.8%
8/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Cardiac disorders
cardiac dysfunction
1.8%
8/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.6%
7/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
coagulation
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
dermatology/skin
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Endocrine disorders
endocrine
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Gastrointestinal disorders
hemorrhage/bleeding
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Hepatobiliary disorders
hepatobiliary/pancreas
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Infections and infestations
infection
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
lymphatics
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
metabolic/laboratory
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.8%
8/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
3.1%
14/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Nervous system disorders
neurology
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Eye disorders
ocular/visual
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
General disorders
pain
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary/upper respiratory
2.1%
9/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
2.5%
11/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Renal and urinary disorders
renal/genitourinary
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Vascular disorders
vascular
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Surgical and medical procedures
hematoma
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
Surgical and medical procedures
Line issue
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.

Additional Information

Derek C. Angus, MD, MPH, FRCP

UPittsburgh

Phone: (412) 647-6965

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place