Trial Outcomes & Findings for Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (NCT NCT00510835)
NCT ID: NCT00510835
Last Updated: 2017-01-26
Results Overview
The primary study outcome is hospital mortality (defined as the number of deaths prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first). The secondary outcomes are duration of survival (90 day and 1 year) and clinical evidence of organ dysfunction.
COMPLETED
NA
1351 participants
prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first
2017-01-26
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
445
|
448
|
458
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
439
|
446
|
456
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 Participants
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 Participants
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
n=456 Participants
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
Total
n=1341 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 • n=5 Participants
|
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1 • n=7 Participants
|
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=5 Participants
|
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
194 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
593 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
232 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
252 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
748 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
439 participants
n=5 Participants
|
446 participants
n=7 Participants
|
456 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1341 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes firstThe primary study outcome is hospital mortality (defined as the number of deaths prior to discharge or 60 days, whichever comes first). The secondary outcomes are duration of survival (90 day and 1 year) and clinical evidence of organ dysfunction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 Participants
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 Participants
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
n=456 Participants
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Mortality
|
92 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
86 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: study hour 0, 6, 24 & 72Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at discharge or 60 days, whichever comes firstOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
Usual Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 participants at risk
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 participants at risk
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
n=456 participants at risk
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
cardiac dysfunction
|
1.6%
7/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.1%
5/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.5%
7/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
hemorrhage/bleeding
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
hepatobiliary/pancreas
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic/laboratory
|
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
neurology
|
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
General disorders
pain
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary/upper respiratory
|
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.1%
5/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
2.2%
10/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
renal/genitourinary
|
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Vascular disorders
vascular
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT)
n=439 participants at risk
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) - The study team will insert a central venous catheter (CVC) for continuous monitoring of the subjects' central venous pressure (CVP) and central venous oxygen saturation (Scv02). The study team will use this information to give fluid, blood, and heart medications in a structured fashion. The CVC is FDA approved and routinely used in hospitals.
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT): Subjects will have a CVC inserted for continuous monitoring of their CVP and Scv02. Early structured treatment will be provided based on subjects' CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Scv02 measurements.
|
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)
n=446 participants at risk
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC)- The study team will monitor the subjects' blood pressure and blood oxygen level with routine equipment. The study team will use this information to give fluid and heart medications in a structured fashion. CVCs will only be used when standard IVs are unable to give the proper amount of fluids and medicines. Blood transfusions will be given according to currently recommended guidelines.
Protocolized Standard Care (PSC): Routine equipment will be used to monitor subjects' blood pressure and oxygen levels. Early structured treatment is based on the subjects' systolic blood pressure and the study doctors' judgment of fluid status and perfusion status.
|
Usual Care
n=456 participants at risk
Usual Care - The attending physicians will treat the subjects according to their standard treatment plan and without any influence from the study team. A member of the study team will simply observe and record what happens.
Usual Care (UC): Attending physicians will provide routine care to subjects. Study measurements and treatments will be based on the physicians'/sites' standard practices.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
allergy/immunology
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
blood/bone marrow
|
1.1%
5/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.6%
7/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.8%
8/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
cardiac dysfunction
|
1.8%
8/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.6%
7/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
coagulation
|
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
dermatology/skin
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
endocrine
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal
|
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
hemorrhage/bleeding
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
hepatobiliary/pancreas
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Infections and infestations
infection
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.67%
3/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
lymphatics
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
metabolic/laboratory
|
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.8%
8/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
3.1%
14/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
neurology
|
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Eye disorders
ocular/visual
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
General disorders
pain
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary/upper respiratory
|
2.1%
9/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
2.5%
11/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
renal/genitourinary
|
0.46%
2/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.45%
2/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Vascular disorders
vascular
|
0.68%
3/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
1.1%
5/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
hematoma
|
0.00%
0/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Line issue
|
0.23%
1/439 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/446 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were reported following the protocol guidelines: 1. Detailed information was collected regarding all SAEs that occurred during ProCESS study hours 0-72 2. Ongoing SAE information was collected for events related to the study PreSep line for the duration of the hospital stay or day 60 (whichever came 1st) 3. After hour 72, all SAEs that investigators considered potentially related to the study intervention were collected.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place