Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of a Novel Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator on the Incidence of Fat Embolism (NCT NCT00509171)
NCT ID: NCT00509171
Last Updated: 2020-05-14
Results Overview
The differences in total emboli score (Embolism Grading Scal3) between the 2 experimental groups were analyzed with a 2-sample 2-tailed t test. Embolism Grading Scale: Amount: Amount of right atrium fill by echogenic particles none = 0 less than ½ = 1 more than ½ = 2 complete fill = 3 Duration: Duration of echogenesis during 1-minute video segment (seconds) none = 0 less than 5 seconds = 1 5-30 seconds = 2 over 30 seconds = 3 Size: Diameter of largest echogenic particle (mm): none = 0 less than 5mm = 1 5-10mm = 2 larger than 10mm = 3 Percent: 0 =no fill 1. = less than 66 % 2. = greater than 66%
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
Duration of surgical procedure.
2020-05-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
1-Standard Reamer
Standard reamer
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
11
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of a Novel Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator on the Incidence of Fat Embolism
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
1-Standard Reamer
n=11 Participants
Standard reamer
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
n=11 Participants
Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.2 years
n=5 Participants
|
39.2 years
n=7 Participants
|
39.2 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Duration of surgical procedure.Population: Antegrade IM nailing of a femoral shaft fracture with standard reamers or the RIA device. All patients were monitored intraoperatively with a continuous TEE to assess embolic events in the right atrium. Total emboli score was measured when using the RIA device during the REAM
The differences in total emboli score (Embolism Grading Scal3) between the 2 experimental groups were analyzed with a 2-sample 2-tailed t test. Embolism Grading Scale: Amount: Amount of right atrium fill by echogenic particles none = 0 less than ½ = 1 more than ½ = 2 complete fill = 3 Duration: Duration of echogenesis during 1-minute video segment (seconds) none = 0 less than 5 seconds = 1 5-30 seconds = 2 over 30 seconds = 3 Size: Diameter of largest echogenic particle (mm): none = 0 less than 5mm = 1 5-10mm = 2 larger than 10mm = 3 Percent: 0 =no fill 1. = less than 66 % 2. = greater than 66%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Standard Reamer
n=11 Participants
Standard reamer
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
n=11 Participants
Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of Embolic Debris
|
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
4.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
Adverse Events
1-Standard Reamer
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
1-Standard Reamer
n=11 participants at risk
Standard reamer
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
n=11 participants at risk
Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
prolonged intubation
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
|
0.00%
0/11
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/11
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/11
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
1-Standard Reamer
n=11 participants at risk
Standard reamer
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
2-Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
n=11 participants at risk
Use of the Reamer-Irrigator Aspirator
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator: Use of standard reamer vs reamer irrigator-aspirator during IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
hardware irritation
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
decrease in hemoglobin
|
0.00%
0/11
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
|
Additional Information
Emil H. Schemitsch, MD, FRCS
London Health Sciences Centre
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60