Trial Outcomes & Findings for Use of Galantamine and CDP-choline (Citicoline) to Treat Adults With Schizophrenia (NCT NCT00509067)
NCT ID: NCT00509067
Last Updated: 2018-04-11
Results Overview
The score for each subject was the sum of the ratings for five items on the negative-symptom subscale of the PANSS: 1) blunted affect, 2) emotional withdrawal, 3) poor rapport, 4) passive/apathetic social withdrawal, and 5) lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation. Each item (symptom) is rated on a scale from 1 = absence of negative symptom to 7 = extreme negative symptom. The sum of the ratings for the five items range from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The primary outcome measure is the mean of the sum of these ratings across subjects.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
43 participants
Measured at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
2018-04-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Use of Galantamine and CDP-choline (Citicoline) to Treat Adults With Schizophrenia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 Participants
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 Participants
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
Total
n=43 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.50 • n=93 Participants
|
52.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.04 • n=4 Participants
|
53.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.94 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
19 participants
n=93 Participants
|
24 participants
n=4 Participants
|
43 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: intent to treat
The score for each subject was the sum of the ratings for five items on the negative-symptom subscale of the PANSS: 1) blunted affect, 2) emotional withdrawal, 3) poor rapport, 4) passive/apathetic social withdrawal, and 5) lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation. Each item (symptom) is rated on a scale from 1 = absence of negative symptom to 7 = extreme negative symptom. The sum of the ratings for the five items range from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The primary outcome measure is the mean of the sum of these ratings across subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 Participants
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 Participants
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Negative Symptoms Measured on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Baseline
|
17.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.48
|
18.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.52
|
|
Negative Symptoms Measured on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Week 4
|
17.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
17.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
|
Negative Symptoms Measured on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Week 8
|
13.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.09
|
17.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
|
Negative Symptoms Measured on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Week 12
|
14.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
17.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.21
|
|
Negative Symptoms Measured on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Week 16
|
13.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
16.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: intent to treat
The score for each subject was the mean rating on the severity item. The score of the item ranged from 1 (normal) to 7 (among most severely ill).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 Participants
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 Participants
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Week 16
|
3.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .68
|
3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .67
|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Baseline
|
4.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .48
|
4.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .58
|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Week 4
|
4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .49
|
3.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .65
|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Week 8
|
3.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .62
|
4.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .82
|
|
Clinical Global Impression
Week 12
|
3.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .64
|
4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Weeks 8 and 16Population: intent to treat
The measure of verbal learning and memory is the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. The score for each subject is the sum of the total number of words recalled correctly for Trials 1, 2, and 3. The measure is the mean of these scores at baseline, Week 8, and Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 Participants
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 Participants
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
MATRICS Verbal Learning and Memory
Baseline
|
20.5 raw scores
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
20.6 raw scores
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
|
MATRICS Verbal Learning and Memory
Week 8
|
21.8 raw scores
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
21.2 raw scores
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
|
MATRICS Verbal Learning and Memory
Week 16
|
23.0 raw scores
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
20.4 raw scores
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
Adverse Events
Galantamine/CDP Choline
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 participants at risk
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 participants at risk
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
hospitalized for cardiac symptoms
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=19 participants at risk
Participants assigned to receive galantamine and CDP-choline
|
Placebos for Galantamine/CDP Choline
n=24 participants at risk
Participants assigned to receive placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
31.6%
6/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Drowsiness
|
31.6%
6/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
26.3%
5/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
20.8%
5/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
26.3%
5/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Restlessness
|
26.3%
5/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Dry Mouth
|
21.1%
4/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Indigestion
|
21.1%
4/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
4.2%
1/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
21.1%
4/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Sleep problem
|
21.1%
4/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Excess Salivation
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Insomnia
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Nasal Congestion
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Sweating
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
20.8%
5/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Decrease in Appetite
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
4.2%
1/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Adverse events were collected weekly over 16 weeks for each participant.
Table presents adverse events by group that were at least moderate at any time point. All AEs were assessed (systematic assessment) on a scale from 1 = absent to 4 = severe.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Stephen I. Deutsch
Department of Psychiatry Georgetown University Medical School
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place