Clinical Proposal for the Comparison of Intraperitoneal Anesthetic to Injected Local Anesthetic
NCT ID: NCT00508976
Last Updated: 2012-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-06-30
2008-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Patients
NCT05537883
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Bariatric Surgery
NCT03373591
Bupivacaine Liposomal Injection (Exparel) for Postsurgical Analgesia in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
NCT02969187
Intravenous Lidocaine for Post-Operative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Bowel Surgery
NCT03095404
The Effect of Pre-Operative Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in the Post Operative Opioid Consumption in Morbid Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Prospective,Randomized, Blinded Study
NCT01075087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3
Streamed bupivacaine versus streamed normal saline
Patients will receive 30ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incisions, then 10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
2
Injected lidocaine pre-incision vs saline pre-incision
Patients will receive 30ml of 1% lidocaine divided equally and injected prior to port site incisions, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
4
Aerosolized bupivacaine versus aerosolized saline
Patients will receive 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incision, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine aerosolized into coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
1
Injected bupivacaine post-operatively
Patients will receive 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incision, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation, and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Injected bupivacaine post-operatively
Patients will receive 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incision, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation, and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
Streamed bupivacaine versus streamed normal saline
Patients will receive 30ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incisions, then 10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
Aerosolized bupivacaine versus aerosolized saline
Patients will receive 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline divided equally and injected prior to port site incision, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine aerosolized into coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
Injected lidocaine pre-incision vs saline pre-incision
Patients will receive 30ml of 1% lidocaine divided equally and injected prior to port site incisions, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline streamed via port directed at operative field, then 10ml of 0.9% normal saline aerosolized into the coelomic cavity prior to deflation and our current standard of care, which is 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, divided equally between the five port-sites, injected at the end of the operation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have used opiates or opiods within 15 days prior to surgery.
3. Patients converted to open gastric bypass.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pinnacle Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Troy Moritz, D.O.
Troy Moritz DO
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Troy A Moritz, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pinnacle Health; Community General Osteopathic Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pinnacle Health; Community General Osteopathic Hospital
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aida S, Baba H, Yamakura T, Taga K, Fukuda S, Shimoji K. The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia varies according to the type of surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):711-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00034.
Alkhamesi NA, Peck DH, Lomax D, Darzi AW. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):602-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9087-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
Barczynski M, Konturek A, Herman RM. Superiority of preemptive analgesia with intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine before rather than after the creation of pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul;20(7):1088-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0458-1. Epub 2006 May 13.
Chou YJ, Ou YC, Lan KC, Jawan B, Chang SY, Kung FT. Preemptive analgesia installation during gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.005.
Einarsson JI, Sun J, Orav J, Young AE. Local analgesia in laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1335-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146283.90934.fd.
Fletcher D, Kayser V, Guilbaud G. Influence of timing of administration on the analgesic effect of bupivacaine infiltration in carrageenin-injected rats. Anesthesiology. 1996 May;84(5):1129-37. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199605000-00015.
Huang SJ, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu HS, Liaw WJ, Li MJ, Liu YH. The preemptive effect of pre-incisional bupivacaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia following lower abdominal surgery under epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1997 Jun;35(2):97-102.
Ke RW, Portera SG, Bagous W, Lincoln SR. A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;92(6):972-5. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00303-2.
Kundu S, Achar S. Principles of office anesthesia: part II. Topical anesthesia. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Jul 1;66(1):99-102.
Lam KW, Pun TC, Ng EH, Wong KS. Efficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: a randomised, double-blind and placebo control study. BJOG. 2004 Apr;111(4):340-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x.
Lohsiriwat V, Lert-akyamanee N, Rushatamukayanunt W. Efficacy of pre-incisional bupivacaine infiltration on postoperative pain relief after appendectomy: prospective double-blind randomized trial. World J Surg. 2004 Oct;28(10):947-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7471-8. Epub 2004 Sep 29.
Jiranantarat V, Rushatamukayanunt W, Lert-akyamanee N, Sirijearanai R, Piromrat I, Suwannanonda P, Muangkasem J. Analgesic effect of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine for postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85 Suppl 3:S897-903.
Maestroni U, Sortini D, Devito C, Pour Morad Kohan Brunaldi F, Anania G, Pavanelli L, Pasqualucci A, Donini A. A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1336-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9181-8. Epub 2002 May 7.
Mixter CG 3rd, Hackett TR. Preemptive analgesia in the laparoscopic patient. Surg Endosc. 1997 Apr;11(4):351-3. doi: 10.1007/s004649900361.
Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):725-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00032. No abstract available.
Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Otten KT, Maddern GJ. Pain after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):445-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649901011.
Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Pfitzner J, Dymock RB, Brealey J, Maddern GJ. A randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of humidified carbon dioxide insufflation during thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999 Apr;13(4):382-5. doi: 10.1007/s004649900994.
Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Millard SH, Baxter PS, Maddern GJ. A randomized controlled trial assessing the benefit of humidified insufflation gas during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999 Feb;13(2):106-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900915.
Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-773. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428.98767.0E.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHH#07-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.