Trial Outcomes & Findings for LAP-BAND AP Early Experience Trial (APEX) (NCT NCT00501085)

NCT ID: NCT00501085

Last Updated: 2015-01-19

Results Overview

Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

521 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 5 Years

Results posted on

2015-01-19

Participant Flow

521 Subjects were enrolled (defined as signing the informed consent). 515 Subjects started treatment and underwent LAP-BAND implantation. 6 Subjects did not have the LAP-BAND implanted after enrolling and signing the informed consent.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
LAP-BAND
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Overall Study
STARTED
515
Overall Study
COMPLETED
83
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
432

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
LAP-BAND
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
195
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
34
Overall Study
Subject Decision
1
Overall Study
Revision Surgery
7
Overall Study
Explantation Surgery
26
Overall Study
Adverse Event
4
Overall Study
Non-Compliance
24
Overall Study
Study closed by sponsor
109
Overall Study
Other loss to follow-up
32

Baseline Characteristics

LAP-BAND AP Early Experience Trial (APEX)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Age, Continuous
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.89 • n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Median Age
42.7 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
422 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
52 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
443 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other (Native American or unspecified)
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Weight
273.9 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.37 • n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline
44.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25 • n=5 Participants
Baseline Excess Weight
118.7 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.46 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Change in Percent Excess Weight
%EWL from baseline 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)
-45.7 percentage of excess weight lost
Standard Deviation 21.26
Change in Percent Excess Weight
%EWL from baseline 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)
-50.8 percentage of excess weight lost
Standard Deviation 26.70
Change in Percent Excess Weight
%EWL from baseline 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)
-47.7 percentage of excess weight lost
Standard Deviation 30.21
Change in Percent Excess Weight
%EWL from baseline 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)
-46.5 percentage of excess weight lost
Standard Deviation 27.23
Change in Percent Excess Weight
%EWL from baseline 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)
-45.9 percentage of excess weight lost
Standard Deviation 26.80

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 5 years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
BMI at 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)
35.9 kg/m2
Standard Deviation 6.39
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
BMI at 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)
34.8 kg/m2
Standard Deviation 6.49
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
BMI at 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)
35.2 kg/m2
Standard Deviation 6.98
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
BMI at 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)
35.1 kg/m2
Standard Deviation 6.20
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
BMI at 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)
35.2 kg/m2
Standard Deviation 6.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Hunger at Baseline (n=487)
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Hunger at Month 60 (n=81)
2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Fullness at Baseline (n=488)
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Fullness at Month 60 (n=81)
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Desire to Eat at Baseline (n=488)
2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Subject Reported Satiety
Level of Desire to Eat at Month 60 (n=81)
2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 5 Years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Subject Reported Quality of Life
OWL-QOL-17 Score at Baseline (n=496)
69.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.98
Subject Reported Quality of Life
OWL-QOL-17 Score at Month 60 (n=74)
34.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.50

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 5 years

Population: The analysis population is defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System.

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 Participants
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
Reported Sleepiness at Baseline (n=498)
8.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.23
Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
Reported Sleepiness at Month 60 (n=79)
5.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.21

Adverse Events

LAP-BAND

Serious events: 38 serious events
Other events: 158 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 participants at risk
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.97%
5/515 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Surgical and medical procedures
Band erosion
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Surgical and medical procedures
Band removal
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Surgical and medical procedures
Band Slip
2.9%
15/515 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Death
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.78%
4/515 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Device Malfunction
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Fibrous Band Obstruction
0.39%
2/515 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Erosion
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Leak
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Perforation
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Prolapse
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Stomal Tumor
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Upset
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intra-abdominal Abscess
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Surgical and medical procedures
LapBand Port Revision
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea/Vomiting
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sepsis
0.19%
1/515 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
LAP-BAND
n=515 participants at risk
Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System. LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System: Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acid Reflux
1.6%
8/515 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Band Slip
0.78%
4/515 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Band too tight
1.7%
9/515 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chest Pain
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Renal and urinary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.97%
5/515 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dilated Gastric Pouch
2.3%
12/515 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
7.2%
37/515 • Number of events 52 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Epigastric pain
0.78%
4/515 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Flipped Port
1.2%
6/515 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food Obstruction
0.78%
4/515 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
2.5%
13/515 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Heartburn
2.1%
11/515 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Increased Restriction
1.4%
7/515 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Pain at port site
1.4%
7/515 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
General disorders
Port Tube Leaking
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Unable to tolerate solids/liquids
1.2%
6/515 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting/Nausea
8.2%
42/515 • Number of events 75 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)
Infections and infestations
Port Site Infection
0.58%
3/515 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).
Adverse Event data was collected for the analysis population, defined as all subjects treated with the LAP-BAND System (N=515)

Additional Information

Laura Eaton, R.N., BSN, CCRN-R

Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.

Phone: 949-468-9301

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place