Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-11-30
2011-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The characterization of an opioid medication's profile can be accomplished through a variety of experimental procedures. One useful procedure for assessing the profile of an opioid is a drug discrimination procedure. In this methodology, subjects are first trained to discriminate reference drugs such as placebo and an opioid agonist, and then administered doses of a novel compound to determine how like (or unlike) it is to the reference training conditions. Our laboratory has a long history of using this drug discrimination methodology to study and to characterize opioids with varying opioid receptor activity profiles. Studies have generally included either two or three training conditions in humans. Using this technique in volunteers, studies have characterized the profile of a number of opioids including (for example) butorphanol, nalbuphine, pentazocine, and buprenorphine.
While most of these studies testing the effects of mixed agonist-antagonist opioids have used an opioid agonist and placebo as the training conditions, tramadol's profile of effects suggests that there may be a non-opioid component of action at serotonin and norepinephrine sites that will be useful to distinguish. In particular, it is of interest to determine the extent to which tramadol is identified as being like a prototypic mu agonist opioid, whether it is substantially identified as being like a non-opioid compound, and if this non-opioid component is related to enhancement of monoamine effects. In order to provide a meaningful non-opioid contrast training condition, this study will compare different doses of tramadol to training conditions of placebo, a mu agonist opioid, and a prototypic stimulant.
Overall, this evaluation will provide a greater understanding of the subjective effect profile of tramadol in comparison to a prototypic mu opioid and a prototypic stimulant. If tramadol is to be useful in the treatment of opioid dependence, a thorough assessment of its subjective effects in experienced opioid and stimulant abusers is warranted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tramadol
oral dose, once per day
tramadol
oral dose, once per day
Placebo
oral dose, once per day
placebo
oral dose, once per day
hydromorphone
oral dose, once per day
Hydromorphone
oral dose, once per day
methylphenidate
oral dose, once per day
Methylphenidate
oral dose, once per day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tramadol
oral dose, once per day
placebo
oral dose, once per day
Hydromorphone
oral dose, once per day
Methylphenidate
oral dose, once per day
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Between the ages of 21-55
* In good physical health
* Without significant psychiatric illness besides their drug use.
* Females are required to provide a negative pregnancy test prior to study participation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with a history of seizures will be excluded.
* Persons with current history of significant alcohol or sedative/hypnotic drug use will be excluded from study participation.
* Applicants seeking treatment for their substance abuse will not be admitted to the study, and will be provided information about treatment services available.
21 Months
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eric Strain, MD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric C Strain, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duke AN, Bigelow GE, Lanier RK, Strain EC. Discriminative stimulus effects of tramadol in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011 Jul;338(1):255-62. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.181131. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DPMCDA
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NIDA-18125-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id