Aprepitant or Ondansetron in Treating Nausea and Vomiting Caused By Opioids in Patients With Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00499668

Last Updated: 2013-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs, such as aprepitant and ondansetron, may help lessen nausea and vomiting caused by opioids. It is not yet known whether aprepitant is more effective than ondansetron in treating nausea and vomiting caused by opioids in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying aprepitant to see how well it works compared to ondansetron in treating nausea and vomiting caused by opioids in patients with cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To evaluate the efficacy of aprepitant as monotherapy for opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) in comparison to ondansetron hydrochloride in patients who have failed at least one prior anti-emetic agent/regimen.

Secondary

* To determine whether control of OINV improves quality of life.
* To determine if control in OINV decreases pain.
* To determine if control in OINV improves mood.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm A: Patients receive aprepitant orally once daily for 7 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or persistent grade 4 nausea and vomiting.
* Arm B: Patients receive ondansetron hydrochloride orally 3 times daily for 7 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or persistent grade 4 nausea and vomiting.

Patients complete the following questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G); Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D); and Brief Pain Index (BPI) at baseline and on day 7. Patients also complete symptom diaries documenting the following: number of episodes (an emetic episode is defined as a simple vomit or retch, or any number of continuous vomits or retches; distinct episodes that are separated by at least 1 minute) of vomiting or retching including the date and time; worst and average degree of nausea (recorded every 2 hours while awake during the first 24 hours after treatment and every 8 hours on days 1-7); and adverse events other than episodes of vomiting and nausea.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myeloproliferative Disorders Leukemia Lymphoma Lymphoproliferative Disorder Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm Myelodysplastic Syndromes Nausea and Vomiting Solid Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ARM A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

aprepitant

Intervention Type DRUG

125 mg orally for 7 days

ARM B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ondansetron hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

24 mg orally for 7 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

aprepitant

125 mg orally for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

ondansetron hydrochloride

24 mg orally for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EMEND Zofran

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* ECOG performance status 0-2
* Able to assess severity of nausea and vomiting and document it in the diary
* Women must not be pregnant or lactating
* Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males are strongly advised to use an accepted and effective method of contraception
* Urine pregnancy test will be given to women of childbearing age
* No concerns about compliance with medication regimen or medical follow-up (patient must be able to tolerate oral dosing)
* No severe or chronic illness or other causes of nausea and vomiting, that in judgment of the treating physician, will place patient at risk
* No severe gastrointestinal obstruction or active peptic ulcer disease
* Serum ALT and AST \< 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Serum bilirubin \< 2 times ULN
* Serum alkaline phosphatase \< 2 times ULN

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* No surgery within the past 7 days
* No chemotherapy within the past 7 days
* No total or lower body radiation therapy within the past 7 days
* Patient may not be scheduled to undergo total body irradiation or lower body irradiation, chemotherapy, or surgery during study participation
* Patient must not be taking warfarin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Barbara Murphy, MD

Professor of Medicine; Director, Cancer Supportive Care Program; Director, Head and Neck Research Program; Medical Oncologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Barbara A. Murphy, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VU-VICC-SUPP-0513

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

VU-VICC-IRB-070193

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MERCK-VU-VICC-SUPP-0513

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

VICC SUPP 0513

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.