Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of Telephone Versus Face-to-Face CBT in Treating People With Depression (NCT NCT00498706)
NCT ID: NCT00498706
Last Updated: 2013-07-17
Results Overview
Number of therapy sessions attended was collected. At the end of treatment, the total number of sessions attended by each patient was collected.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
325 participants
Post treatment, up to 18 weeks
2013-07-17
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from November 2007 to December 2010 from general internal medicine clinics in Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation and Northwestern Memorial Physician's Group, and from 4 primary care clinic members of Northwestern's Practice-Based Research Network.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
163
|
162
|
|
Overall Study
Post Treatment Week 18
|
163
|
162
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
163
|
162
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effectiveness of Telephone Versus Face-to-Face CBT in Treating People With Depression
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
n=163 Participants
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
n=162 Participants
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Total
n=325 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
150 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
298 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=7 Participants
|
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
252 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
163 participants
n=5 Participants
|
162 participants
n=7 Participants
|
325 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatment, up to 18 weeksPopulation: A randomized controlled trial of 325 Chicago area primary care patients with major depressive disorder, recruited from November 1007 to December 2010.
Number of therapy sessions attended was collected. At the end of treatment, the total number of sessions attended by each patient was collected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
n=2518 sessions
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
n=2221 sessions
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Attrition (Number of Therapy Sessions Attended)
|
15.4 Number of Sessions
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
13.7 Number of Sessions
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatment, up to 18 weeksUsing the number of therapy sessions attended, we categorized patients into: 1. those who discontinued treatment before session 18, and those who completed session 18. 2. those who discontinued before Session 5, and those who continued.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
n=163 Participants
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
n=162 Participants
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Dropped Out of Therapy
those who discontinued treatment before session 18
|
34 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Dropped Out of Therapy
those who discontinued before Session 5,
|
7 participants
|
21 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6 post-treatment follow-upMeasures depression on a 9 - item scale. Scores range from 0-27, with 0 being no symptoms. A difference of 5 or more points on the PHQ-9 is considered a clinically meaningful response to treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
n=162 Participants
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
n=163 Participants
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
3-month follow-up
|
7.59 units on a scale
Interval 6.6 to 8.58
|
6.60 units on a scale
Interval 5.56 to 7.64
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Baseline
|
16.76 units on a scale
Full Range 4.7 • Interval 16.24 to 17.29
|
16.76 units on a scale
Full Range 4.8 • Interval 16.24 to 17.29
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Week04
|
10.78 units on a scale
Interval 9.92 to 11.64
|
10.09 units on a scale
Interval 9.21 to 10.97
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Week09
|
9.05 units on a scale
Interval 8.13 to 9.96
|
8.62 units on a scale
Interval 7.64 to 9.59
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Week14
|
8.55 units on a scale
Interval 7.53 to 9.56
|
7.77 units on a scale
Interval 6.73 to 8.82
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Week18
|
6.65 units on a scale
Interval 5.72 to 7.58
|
6.74 units on a scale
Interval 5.74 to 7.73
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
6-month follow-up
|
8.42 units on a scale
Interval 7.38 to 9.46
|
6.30 units on a scale
Interval 5.24 to 7.37
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6, 9, and 12 of follow-upHam-D indicates Hamilton Depression Rating Scale,range is 0 to 52. A score of 0 means the best outcome with no depression symptoms reported, and a score of 52 is the worse outcome with highest level of depression reported. A difference of 3 points on the Hamilton scale has been identified as clinically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Telephone-administered CBT
n=163 Participants
Participants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
Face-to-face CBT
n=162 Participants
Participants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Baseline
|
22.83 units on a scale
Full Range 4.6 • Interval 22.34 to 23.33
|
22.83 units on a scale
Full Range 4.6 • Interval 22.34 to 23.33
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Week04
|
18.07 units on a scale
Interval 17.16 to 18.98
|
17.86 units on a scale
Interval 16.96 to 18.77
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Week09
|
15.62 units on a scale
Interval 14.6 to 16.65
|
16.45 units on a scale
Interval 15.4 to 17.51
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Week14
|
14.94 units on a scale
Interval 13.77 to 16.12
|
14.18 units on a scale
Interval 12.97 to 15.39
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Week18
|
13.58 units on a scale
Interval 12.42 to 14.74
|
12.51 units on a scale
Interval 11.22 to 13.81
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
3-month follow-up
|
14.58 units on a scale
Interval 13.45 to 15.71
|
12.33 units on a scale
Interval 11.1 to 13.64
|
|
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
6-month follow-up
|
15.06 units on a scale
Interval 13.84 to 16.27
|
12.14 units on a scale
Interval 10.84 to 13.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6, 9, and 12 of follow-upOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Telephone-administered CBT
Face-to-face CBT
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place